Box Turtle Reader Writes

Timothy Kincaid

October 27th, 2008

Ben in Oakland is a frequent commenter here on the Box Turtle Bulletin. He has also taken the time to pen a very compelling personal argument against Proposition 8. It is printed today in the Eureka Reporter:

We’re not a threat to anyone or anything. Nor is our marriage. We’re just Ben and Paul. And we want to stay married.

Ben doesn’t argue about schools or churches or the falsity of Yes on 8’s latest wacky claim. He talks about his life and his marriage and what it means to him and his family.

Gay people and straight people are pretty much alike, including such matters as romance, family, marriage and religion. And why shouldn’t we be? We’re your relatives and friends. We’re you. Are we not human enough, not citizens enough, to grant us the right to marry? We want for us and our families exactly what you get from our government: the same respect and equality before the law that you demand for yourselves. That’s it. Our lives and families are as valuable as yours. You don’t have to approve of gay people or be a part of our lives. We aren’t attacking your families, faith or civil rights, nor preventing them from being legally protected. Can you say the same about yourselves?

We want to take nothing from you. We want only the same rights and protections that you have. Nothing more — and nothing less.

There are dozens and dozens of newspapers across this state. And a well written opinion – or even a letter to the editor that appeals to the reader in a personal way – can make a difference in a vote. And often papers, especially local or smaller circulation papers, are happy to include a thought provoking piece that they don’t have to fit into a deadline.

Ben has very generously offered to let our other readers steal his work or take what they can use if they will only help spread the message. Please consider if you can either write your own letter – or borrow Ben’s – and help change a heart and mind.

Tara TASW

October 27th, 2008

Great work, Ben. Thank you. I’m oneof many who have been phone banking, demonstrating, handing out fliers and donating – and we won’t stop until we win. We all deserve that simple equality that you so eloquently describe.

-Tara The Antisocial Social Worker

AJD

October 27th, 2008

Very good! I’ve been trying to get an op-ed on the matter published as well, but I suspect I don’t have a lot of clout with editors, being a New Yorker.

Louie

October 27th, 2008

Awesome letter, Ben! It moved me to tears and after I was done reading, it moved me to TAKE ACTION!

For the sake of my marriage, to the only man I have ever loved for the past 12 years, and for the sake of every single same-gender marriage performed since it became legal in California!

I will make another money sacrifice and contact all of my friends and family in California, again, and remind them to vote “NO” on Prop. 8!


California – Vote “NO” on Prop. 8!
Arizona – Vote “NO” on Prop. 102! AGAIN!
Florida – Vote “NO” on Amendment 2!
Connecticut – Vote “NO” on Question 1!

Ben in Oakland

October 28th, 2008

Thanks all.

Alex

October 28th, 2008

“We aren’t attacking your families, faith or civil rights, nor preventing them from being legally protected. Can you say the same about yourselves?”

Excellent!!

El Rose

October 28th, 2008

No, you’re not just like us. YOu are 2 men or 2 women who want to be given the same rights and privledges as heterosexuals but you are not heterosexuals. YOu do not share the same bodies nor do you share the same ideas of monogomy. YOu are free to love whomever you want, but you are not free to marry whomever you want.

TJ McFisty

October 28th, 2008

Wow! Offensive, self-aggrandizing, and wrong all the in the same comment! That’s truly worthy of some prize.

I’m really surprised heterosexuals suddenly got this lock on monogamy–when’d that happen, and hets also suddenly established that as the exclusive claim to marriage. Guess that teevee show about Het Swinging is 100% whole cloth fabrication.

And what does “do not share same bodies” mean?

I wouldn’t get hung up on similarities being exclusive locks on marriage…millions of dollars have been made on books written about dissimilarities. By your statements about “having the same ____” men and women shouldn’t be allowed to marry.

I mean, at least I can share my partner’s clothing and not feel ill-fittingly uncomfortable. We’re similar in body type. That much is the same…can we get married, now, and when do we get to vote on yours?

Ben in Oakland

October 28th, 2008

el rose: “YOu are 2 men or 2 women who want to be given the same rights and privledges as heterosexuals but you are not heterosexuals. ”

thanks for clairfying. It is truly all aobut prejudice for you, isn’t it? “You just want the same rights and privileges as (white people) (Christians)(English speakers)(Men)… but you’re not blah blahblah.

It’s all about the myth of heterosexual superiority in service to the reality of heterosexual privilege to enforce the myth of heterosexual hegemony.

honey, you’re just heterosexual. you’re not special. You’re not normal, just common.

A common heterosexual, a common bigot.

Maybe someday you’ll look yourslef in the mirror and wonder why you ever thought that hating a whole group of people you don’t know and know nothing about qualifies you as a decent human being.

Louie

October 28th, 2008

El Rose wrote:

…nor do you share the same ideas of monogomy.

First off, you misspelled “monogamy”. Sorry, blame my honors English teacher. And English wasn’t even my FIRST language! DOH!

As far as I knew, there is and always has been only 1 definition for “monogamy”. Unless something has changed or us “gays” are supposed to use an alternate dictionary, my definition for “monogamy” is the following:

Monogamy:
The practice of having sex with only one partner.

For this example, I used the definition from WebMD one of the world’s most popular medical websites.

Hmm, their definition for “monogamy” is exactly what I thought “monogamy” meant as well.

So, let’s apply this “definition” to a real world example.

My “husband” and I have been married for the past 12 years in our hearts and “legally” in California for the past 4 months.

In the past 12 years, I have ONLY had sex with ONE person, my beloved.

In the past 12 years, my beloved has ONLY had sex with ONE person, me.

This certainly seems to qualify as “monogamy” to me.

And you get to vote on whether or not I deserve to get “civil” rights under the eyes of the law of the State of California?!

“Beam me up, Scotty!”


California – Vote “NO” on Prop. 8!
Arizona – Vote “NO” on Prop. 102! AGAIN!
Florida – Vote “NO” on Amendment 2!
Connecticut – Vote “NO” on Question 1!

zortnac

October 28th, 2008

Thanks for the letter and the inspiration Ben. I’ve written to my home town’s paper hoping to follow suit :-)

Ben in Oakland

October 28th, 2008

You’re welcome. We must all do what we can. The LA News is going to publish it as well. I sure hope a few others follow suit. It was a lot of work getting this written ando ut to 30 newspapers across the state.

Sapphocrat

October 29th, 2008

Beautiful, Ben. If I write ten million more words on marriage, I’ll never say as much as you have in single letter, and certainly never approach your eloquence.

Ben in Oakland

October 29th, 2008

thanks, sappho.

Ben in Oakland

October 29th, 2008

Meanwhile– yoo-hoo, el rose!! Are you here?

codyj

October 29th, 2008

GOOD LUCK, BEN !! What a WONDERFULL letter, it also, as it has other readers,brought a tear to my eye..so TRUE for ALL of “us’ . Best Regards,Best Wishes, and good luck, to you, now ,and ALWAYS. Cody J

Ben in Oakland

October 29th, 2008

Thanks, cody. Please feel free to use it however you can.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1987: Reagan Names Gay Man To AIDS Commission

Born On This Day, 1816: Charlotte Saunders Cushman

Born On This Day, 1858: Edward Prime-Stevenson (a.k.a. "Xavier Mayne")

Trump: "I Will Protect Our LG, BTQ Citizens From Hateful Foreign Ideology"

PayPal Co-Founder Peter Thiel: "I'm Proud To Be Gay, I'm Proud To Be a Republican, I'm Proud To Be An American"

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1958: New Orleans Launches Raids Against Gay Bars

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.