NOM Commits Sodomy
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, February 11
The Daily Agenda for Friday, February 10
Again anti-gays blindly and gleefully shoot themselves in the foot
Rep. Walsh leads with her heart
Advocate, WaPo, AP Get it Wrong On Anti-Homosexuality Bill
Uganda Executive, Parliament Tussle Over Anti-Homosexuality BIll
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, February 9
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 450 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
Posts 
Posts via daily email:
elaygee
November 13th, 2008 | LINK
The Marriot chain has been so Gay friendly over the last many years that I would hate to see any bad publicity for them. Bill Marriott seems to know how to balance his work with his personal beliefs, unlike the christofacists from Utah.
Stefano A
November 13th, 2008 | LINK
I have to admit, I never did understand why there was a call to boycott the entire Marriott franchise rather than the holdings of a specific franchise owner.
Doug Manchester was who donated the $125,000 to Yes on 8. The franchise owner of the Manchester Grand Hyatt and the San Diego Marriott Hotel and Marina.
johnson
November 13th, 2008 | LINK
It would be really bad to boycott Marriott as they are inclusive and gay friendly. They run a great hotel chain, and have always treated my partner and I with the utmost of courtesy and respect.
cowboy
November 13th, 2008 | LINK
The Marriott Corporation is not the evil empire.
Trust me. Our efforts to change the will and the mind of the LDS Church and its sympathizers is by direct appeal to the MEMBERS of the LDS faith.
You do that by being exemplary citizens.
I know the Marriott Hotel has been a good host to the gay rodeo in San Diego. I have only praise for them when I stayed there. The whole hotel was filled with gay rodeo participants and gay staff they called in to help.
(And the Marriott at Dana Point…need I say more?)
Timothy Kincaid
November 13th, 2008 | LINK
All I ask of Bill Marriott and his hotels is that they treat me with equality and not fund efforts to take away my rights.
Marriott Hotels gets a “thumbs up” from me.
Snappyback
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
I’m not so mollified. We know, per the Hinckley document, that the LDS has been aiming for us for years. As a good Mormon, Bill Marriott presumably tithes. That means he HAS given to harm our families.
Is it OK to give to the Klan if they only use it for operational expenses, and not to directly harm blacks?
LDS = hate group. Don’t forget it.
Mark with a K
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Sorry, folks. If any money I would spend at Marriott (actually, did spend)goes to the LDS…and this gets tipped back to taking away our rights, I am NOT going for it.
Smart businessman–he figures he’d better be good to those fags so they can read his Mormon Bibles and maybe repent our evil ways!
I shall personally boycott the Marriott chain for-ever.
Anyone care to join?
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Sappyback and Mark using your lines of logic, there is hardly a business in existence that you would be able to support. Any business that is owned by or has anti-gay religious employees , those individuals tithe to their churches and those tithes are all derived from their work-derived income.
Even large businesses like PepsiCo who which are global employers would most likely have a number of such people in various levels in their employee. PepsiCo just made a grant in September of $500k to PFLAG. So, you going to boycott PepsiCo as well?
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Yeah, tithes may be leading indirectly but at least they’re not going out of their way to make our lives more difficult by contributions. And while Bill Marriott might have voted yes, his single vote was probably offset at least to some part by the votes of all the gay employees and allies that work for the Marriott franchise.
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
While you’re at it, if you own shares you probably should consider selling those off as well so that you’re not deriving any prophets from some business that has a Mormon or Catholic employee (both religions have pretty stingent tithing requirements.)
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Errr… that would be profits not prophets. (LOL)
Mark with a K
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Truth be told, I have started to ask people–such as the proprietor of the place where I bring my dry cleaning, or the person who mows our lawn, how they voted on Prop 8.
So far all the answers have been on our side–and of course they could be lying, I’ll never know.
But if I knew that they voted Yes, indeed they would no longer get my business.
And for right now, I am focusing on Mormons. I realize there are other anti-gay persons and businesses to whom I give my money; it’s an imperfect world. But you know what? For me–maybe not for you–doing one thing to respond to bigotry beats my not doing anything.
North Dallas Thirty
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
And for right now, I am focusing on Mormons. I realize there are other anti-gay persons and businesses to whom I give my money; it’s an imperfect world. But you know what? For me–maybe not for you–doing one thing to respond to bigotry beats my not doing anything.
And of course, doing so gives you what you think is a valid rationalization for what is rather flagrant antireligious bigotry.
But then again, targeting Jews, Catholics, or black people would get you into trouble with the PC police, so you’re making sure to choose your bigotry so that it’s more socially acceptable.
Timothy Kincaid
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Guys… in general I’ve found that it is not a productive use of time to try and debate with North Dallas Thirty. He doesn’t play by the same rules of engagement that we do.
Let him make his statements – as long as they don’t violate Comments Policy – and let them stand on their own. It will save you a lot of frustration and will avoid having this thread hijacked by pigtrails and pointless rhetoric.
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
What I’m asking is this, you know the one owner of a Franchise went out of their way to reverse SSM.
Another or several other properties in the same Franchise did not.
The owner of the brand did not.
So why boycott the entire brand based on the reason of tithes alone?
And in the process of doing so “just because they’re Mormon” you alianate the Mormon’s who did support us and did not contribute but do still tithe.
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
BTW: My last post was to Mark.
Mark with a K
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
I don’t know you, Stefano, so it’s not important to me if you agree with me or not.
But my unsolicited advice is that you let our shared movement go forward by letting everyone have his/her own say and way of dealing with the situation. By attempting to project your philosophy onto me, or challenging mine, you ultimately undermine our common goal.
Signing off for the night!
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Mark:
Let me use a different analogy.
McDonald’s
A particular franchised McDonald’s in Kentucky allowed it’s employees to call customer’s “faggots”.
The supervisor on duty refused to refund the group’s purchase, claiming that only the restaurant’s general manager could authorize a refund.
The customers made several attempts in the following weeks to contact both the general manager of the particular McDonald’s franchise to no avail.
McDonald’s as a brand however, has anti-discrimination policies in place.
So, are you going to boycott all McDonald’s or just the one restaurant?
Stefano A
November 14th, 2008 | LINK
Mark:
That’s fine. If you just wish to talk to yourself I won’t stop you.
However, the reason I engaged you in conversation was to try to understand your reasoning.
Which apparently, is simply to act out in anger without regard to consequences either to other gays and our allies because it will make you feel better.
Leave A Comment