Heterosexual Menace: A Fine Way To Raise A Son

Jim Burroway

December 8th, 2008

In Pennsylvania:

A Mt. Holly Springs husband and wife whose 12-year-old son was accused of raping a 3-year-old girl he was baby-sitting in August 2007 were found guilty Wednesday of endangering the welfare of a child and corruption of minors.

The parents, ages 38 and 43, were charged when a search warrant served in investigation of their son’s statements turned up more than 3,000 Polaroid pictures the father had taken showing the mother in “provocative” poses and “various forms of undress,” prosecutors said. In about 40 of those pictures, the son was near the mother — sometimes within two feet or less of her, police said.

Police were tipped to the material when they boy told investigators that “it didn’t seem that [he and the 3-year-old] had as much fun as [the parents] did in the video,” before leading them to videos recorded by his parents in their home.

“At the time I didn’t think there was anything wrong with it, as long as he wasn’t paying attention,” the father testified, saying his son had been absorbed in television and video games when the pictures were taken. “Now I realize how stupid it was.”

The parents’ names are being withheld to protect their son’s identity. Pennsylvania is one of only twenty states where they haven’t yet “protected” marriage from the gays.

Denise

December 8th, 2008

This is a heinous story. I hope the children can get proper care from here on out. And I especially hope that the boy especially can learn appropriate behaviors and boundaries, that he is not stuck in this harmful way for the rest of his life.

Also, Pennsylvania is one of only twenty states where they haven’t yet “protected” marriage from the gays.
Correction: We have a DOMA law prohibiting gay marriages within the state. A constitutional amendment was defeated last Spring in the state assembly, which may be what you were thinking of.

Willie Hewes

December 8th, 2008

So, is this going to be a series, like “every child deserves a mother and a father” on SLOG?

I think I understand the point you’re making, but perhaps its useful to make explicit what you’re doing and why?

Are you highlighting married heterosexuals who endanger children? Or just documenting the worst failures of heterosexual marriage to encourage wholesome behaviour?

Is you point: they mess up all the time why can’t we have a go, or: heterosexuals are bad for children too, or: heterosexuals abusing children are worse than gays abusing children, or what?

Like I said, I THINK I know what you’re doing, but I also think it’s open to misinterpretation.

Keep up the good work though, BTB is great.

El Rose

December 8th, 2008

I think the point is clear:
Look at all those evil married heterosexuals that hurt children.

Take a breath. Any adult (and sadly, even a 12 yr old boy) who behaves in an inappropriatge way and/or commits a crime against a child, needs to be held acountable.

There will always be those who do evil things. The reason same sex marriage is not a good idea is because traditional marriage has been the foundation of our society (societies comes from producing and raising offspring) and best course for raising children. Governments back male/female marriage because the MAJORITY of married heterosexuals do a pretty good job of raising kids.

Politicalguineapig

December 8th, 2008

I think the point is that homosexuals are less likely to abuse children than heteros are.

cooner

December 8th, 2008

El Rose: “Governments back male/female marriage because the MAJORITY of married heterosexuals do a pretty good job of raising kids.”

The MAJORITY of homosexual couples with kids do a pretty good job of raising them, too. They also adopt a lot of kids who would otherwise be living in orphanages or foster care. The only difference is that those couples and their kids aren’t afforded the legal protections of marriage.

“There will always be those who do evil things.” And the point is, as you said, hold those who do the accountable. Don’t misguidedly punish an entire class of citizens over some perceived danger that doesn’t in fact exist.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.