New York Marriage Hopes Back On

Timothy Kincaid

December 10th, 2008

[Jim has also written about this change in the marriage landscape]

We told you of an agreement between Senate Majority Leader hopeful Malcolm Smith and three renegade Democratic Senators which would buy their support by assuring them that gay marriage would not be allowed to be presented for a vote in the New York State Senate. Now it seems that Mr. Smith has had a little conversation with his integrity and that his integrity won.

Newsday is reporting that the deal is off:

“We’re prepared to wait if we have to to come into the majority,” Smith said. He was flanked by senators Neil Breslin of Albany and Liz Krueger of Manhattan when he made the announcement.

Smith said the three renegades were motivated by “personal interests.” He also said he wouldn’t subject civil rights issues to negotiation, referring to a proposal backed by many Democrats to legalize gay marriage.

“That issue should never be a part of a negotiation,” Smith said, and should be subject to the legislative process.

The article suggests that the role of “integrity” was played by other members of the Democratic Caucus who had to remind Smith about what he believed. Nonetheless, this is a significant and brave step for Smith and for the Democrats. And I commend them for finding their courage and taking the risk.

The three rebels may decide that if they can’t get their way, they’ll turn power back over to the Republicans. But I think a more likely scenario is that they know that such a vote would be political suicide and that in the end they will support Smith. And, if so, there will probably be a vote on marriage equality in the relatively near future.

So now it is up to Empire Pride to lobby the other Democratic Senators and to work with Log Cabin to try and pull enough Republican Senators to get a “yes” majority. Those readers living in New York should begin to consider what steps they can take to help.

(hat tip Good As You)

lurker

December 10th, 2008

What I find particularly appalling is that the NY Times article about this – in their “blog” section – vaguely hints about the problem with this deal being power-grabbing, no mention of the sell out on civil rights.

Duncan

December 11th, 2008

Much as I disagree with these three senators, they are standing up and defying their party for their beliefs. But now they have a chance to show that it was not a bluff and they put their beliefs above their careers by handing power back to the Republicans. We’ll see.

Tavdy

December 11th, 2008

One possible problem now is that, if Diaz & Co. want to be kingmakers, they’re stuck with the Republicans. I wonder what the future electoral implications would be if they hand the Repugs the state senate on a platter?

The alternative would be a hung parliament with neither party having control, but I’m not sure if that’s possible in US-style politics.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.