Barney Frank on Warren Pick

Jim Burroway

December 18th, 2008

Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) just sent out this statement on Obama’s selection of Rick Warren to offer the Inaugural invocation:

I am very disappointed by President-elect Barack Obama’s decision to honor Reverend Rick Warren with a prominent role in his inauguration. Religious leaders obviously have every right to speak out in opposition to anti-discrimination measures, even in the degrading terms that Rev. Warren has used with regard to same-sex marriage. But that does not confer upon them the right to a place of honor in the inauguration ceremony of a president whose stated commitment to LGBT rights won him the strong support of the great majority of those who support that cause.

It is irrelevant that Rev. Warren invited Senator Obama to address his congregation, since he extended an equal invitation to Senator McCain. Furthermore, the President-Elect has not simply invited Rev. Warren to give a speech as part of a series in which various views are presented. The selection of a member of the clergy to occupy this uniquely elevated position has always been considered a mark of respect and approval by those who are being inaugurated.

Jaft

December 18th, 2008

He put it better than I could.

Hank

December 18th, 2008

I guess we should’ve stuck with Hillary.

Robert

December 18th, 2008

I’m beginning to feel that Obama is extending one hand to gays in friendship and equality while the other hand secretly holds a knife to our backs. Time will tell.

Regan DuCasse

December 18th, 2008

Why not Rabbi Marvin Hier? Why not a Bishop from an all inclusive church? Like Bishop John S. Spong, who has many years of civil rights advocacy behind him?

Someone like Desmond Tutu? Unless they have to be American. But Tutu is an INTERNATIONAL figure that everyone knows, also a human rights advocate and outright HERO.

Inviting Warren to the Inaugeration, no biggie. But the invocation…no way.

Hebrewtatttoo

December 18th, 2008

Great choice.

Now this is change.

Nolan Nelson

December 18th, 2008

I submit reasonable scholarship must conclude Christian faith cannot advocate homosexual marriage. The entire Bible, in speaking of the character, identity, and purpose of God, continuously addresses the issue of homosexual behavior. The scriptures say that in addition to creating all things, God created a single institution, which was marriage between a man and woman as the earthy manifestation of the oneness relationship He seeks with all human beings.

Throughout the Bible He is spoken of as masculine, and all humans become feminine in relation to Him: become the Bride of Christ. To restore relationship lost in Eden, God sent Christ to die for all human sins, but people must repent of, reject all our sins. To pursue fornication, adultery, or homosexual behavior is to reject His identity and His character, and therefore repudiate His gift of salvation.

In Him absolute righteousness and absolute love achieves perfect justice. The scriptures provide no prescription for this problem, but pose a moral paradox requiring one to come before Him. His solution compromises neither His righteousness, nor His unconditional love in guiding each person who struggles through a fallen world, and lives with a fallen nature.

In advocating homosexual marriage, Christian leaders must abandon sound scholarship, and adjust and select scriptures to fabricate a god of their own design. The result is comforting, popular, and easily controlled. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob remains timeless, all knowing, all powerful; terrible, unconditionally loving, and awaits humanity’s plea to Him.

Patrick

December 18th, 2008

Nolan,
I invite you to read “Thou Shalt Not Love: What Evangelicals Really Say to Gays” and then decide if your comment about “reasonable scholarship” is accurate. I think you will realize that “reasonable scholarship” does not necessitate your conclusion. In fact, I think you will find some “reasonable scholars” strongly disagree with you and have legitimate reasons for their disagreement.

RomeoandJoe

December 19th, 2008

This is neither the time nor the place to open dialogue with the bigots. Had this clown made anti-semitic or anti-black remarks you can bet he wouldn’t be on the speech menu! Remember also, this is not just a gay issue…his positions on abortion and stem cell research should send out some more alarms…Obama really goofed on this one!

Ben in Oakland

December 19th, 2008

I was afraid the obama would just be clinton light. I can remember in ’92 feeling the same feelings of elation, yet wondering if and how he was going to screw us. I wasn’t surprised when he backed off DADT, and signed DOMA on the very day the imprisoned night stalker murderer married a woman he had never met, and during the time period he was preserving marriage by getting monica’d in the oval office.

There were so many people he could have chosen who would have sent an entirely different message. This was Obama’s Sarah Palin moment. We have been imPalined.

This is why I will not, under any circumstance, give money to any politician or political party, ever.

Ben in Oakland

December 19th, 2008

Nolan nelson: I won’t get into a theological debate with you. Most of what you have to say is highly debatable. Paraphrasing Humpty Dumpty in Alice, the bible means what I say it means, nothing more and nothing less.

Here’s a real test of faith and truth for you. Rather than beating up on gay people, which is relatively easy, why don’t you go to Iran and explain to any mullah you can find why your faith and interpetations are the correct ones, and a billion muslims are dead wrong.

And if you survive that, then you can come back and read the parts of your book that tell you that it is not your place to judge, nor your right to try to contain your god within the covers of a book.

Chaz

December 19th, 2008

Nicely put by Barney. Are we starting to see Obama’s true colours?

Priya Lynn

December 19th, 2008

Nolan said “God, continuously addresses the issue of homosexual behavior.”.

Not even close. The bible has a few passages that can be interpreted to be about gays, it is far from a continual address. If it were the bible would be about nothing but gay behavior. On the other hand the bible has over 300 admonitions to heterosexuals.

Nolan said “The scriptures say that in addition to creating all things, God created a single institution, which was marriage between a man and woman as the earthy manifestation of the oneness relationship He seeks with all human beings.”.

It doesn’t say that anywhere in the bible. Adam and Eve were never married and their children engaged in incestuous behavior. Clearly from the beginning marriage was never a part of your god’s plan.

Dennis Veite

December 19th, 2008

@Nolan Nelson, if it’s so damned important to you why are you lurking about on Box Turtle Bulletin? Get off our board and out of our state.

Timothy Kincaid

December 20th, 2008

Dennis,

Box Turtle is a forum for those who disagree as well. We aren’t interested in creating an echo chamber.

Timothy Kincaid

December 20th, 2008

Nolan Nelson,

I find it intereting that you bring up the parallel that the Christian body is the bride of Christ. At no point in Scripture are we told that this then feminizes humanity. Never.

You will recall that the audience of this message was primarily male (recall that Paul directs that women enquire from men if they don’t understand the faith). However, this imagery did not seem to bother those who heard it too much.

Perhaps they were less obsessed about the male-female nature of wedding imagery. And that may be because of a dominant Roman culture which was familiar with homosexuality and non-gender-conforming roles.

In any case, I don’t tend to get too caught up in the gender of God. I’m not at all sure why anyone would care whether God has a penis or what he would do with it if he did.

Dennis Veite

December 21st, 2008

@Hank: Oh, you think???

Dennis Veite

December 21st, 2008

My apologies, Timothy.

N Waff

December 22nd, 2008

It’s good to see that Barney Franks follows his homosexual agenda of “inclusion” and doesn’t discriminate against people of other beliefs. I’d hate to see Franks declare the choice of pastor Rick Warren as a mistake for praying in the inauguration just because he holds a Christian Biblical world view. Oops, scratch that – Franks if being a hypocrite.

Roberto

December 22nd, 2008

Barney’s sending a clear signal – whether planned or not – that he’s intolorant.

Interesting when ‘tolerance’ is asked for, yet Barney cannot give it. This destroys his argument. “Do as I say, not as I do.” This sets back the gay community.

Barney has bigger fish to fry…like maybe the FINANCIAL CRISIS..

As Rodney King said, “Can’t we all just get along?”.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

By The Way...

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1961: Illinois Becomes First State to Rescind Sodomy Law

Today In History, 1967: England, Wales Rescinds Gross Indecency Law

Emphasis Mine

Today In History, 1977: Gays Zap Straight Bar Over "Fairies Swatter" Sign

Marco Rubio Announced As Featured Speaker At Anti-Gay Event In Orlando

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.