New Hampsure results silence NOM's Maggie Gallagher
Mormon/Boy Scout sexual abuse problem
"Not Equal" Flag Debuted in New York DADT Protest
"Not Guilty, Not Ashamed, and Not Finished"
Anti-gay general's comments infuriate the Dutch
ENDA Sit-ins Result in Arrests in DC and San Francisco
Anti-Gay Group Sells Snakeoil
Schumer Argues for LGBT Incusion in Immigration Reform
Featured Reports
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than two hundred posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Nelson G
December 23rd, 2008 | LINK
Thus it would seem that when Obama meant “Change”, it was of the ex-gay kind.
James G
December 23rd, 2008 | LINK
At what point did “separate but equal” make a comeback? How is this even acceptable in polite society?
a. mcewen
December 23rd, 2008 | LINK
I hate to be the one to say this but let’s proceed with caution on this one.
Rick Warren has done much to get criticized for but let’s not make it look like we are putting up some type of litmus test for pastors who will be participating in Obama’s inauguration.
Patrick
December 23rd, 2008 | LINK
Obama doesn’t support marriage either, so we shouldn’t be surprised by the pastors not supporting it either. I sincerely doubt Obama chose pastors based on their views of marriage. The problem with his selection of Warren is Warren’s insulting comments and activities, not that he doesn’t approve of marriage. At least Mr Lowery admits his problem is just discomfort and unfamiliarity with the concept not some moral opposition.
Gregory
December 23rd, 2008 | LINK
I have to side with mcewan here. While I am strongly supportive of gay marriage and gay rights, I do not think that we need to establish this as some sort of litmus test that determines whether a candidate (let alone an inaugural “invoker”) is “worthy”. Certainly there is a time for such disputes, but I have to agree with some writer somewhere (I can’t seem to remember) who stated that this is in fact not an attack on GLBT, but an attempt to reach over to the other side, something Obama promised earlier on.
Furthermore, it is not as though President-elect Obama has made Rick Warren his spiritual advisor. While this is a great honor, and I think there are some legitimate problems with Rick Warren (personally, I am not a fan of his recent “assassin” comments, a little too pat robertson for my tastes), on the whole he has done much. Remember, he came into the whole pro-Prop 8 thing late, and records show he didn’t contribute (significantly?).
I hope this ordeal doesn’t reveal GLBT activists to be non-compromising, as sometimes compromise is necessary. Biden said it well when he stated that this was in no way a step away from gay rights, but a step to be more inclusive.
Those are my ten cents.
Timothy Kincaid
December 24th, 2008 | LINK
Personally, I’ll take Joseph Lowery’s support and not for a moment consider him bigoted because of his hesitation to recognize that marriage can be other than as he’s always known. He’s a supporter and a hero.
But I find it interesting that this is playing out as pro-marriage v. anti-marriage when it’s really about pro-decency v. demonization.
I don’t mind that Warren supported Prop 8. I would have been surprised if he hadn’t. But there were literally thousands of pastors in this state that supported Proposition 8 without tying gay relationships to pedophiles, polygamists, or the incestuous.
werdna
December 24th, 2008 | LINK
And many pastors who supported Prop 8 did so without lying about the impact of same-sex marriage on their ability to preach anti-gay bigotry from the pulpit.
AJD
December 24th, 2008 | LINK
Lowery’s position is only disappointing within the context of the fact that Warren was invited. Otherwise, it wouldn’t matter, I don’t think.
Still, I agree with a. mcewen that Lowery is best left alone. He himself did say that he was against marriage amendments, after all, and he described his feeling as a “culture shock,” so he could just as easily have meant that he was against same-sex marriage on a more personal level, as opposed to be actively opposed to it.
Leave A Comment