More sensationalistic HIV headlines
Getting the story wrong on HIV
Seymour Pine, Cop Who Led Stonewall Raid, Dies at 91
Uganda May Pass Portions of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill On The Downlow
Prominent Ugandan Anti-Gay Minister Defeated In Party Elections
Justice O'Connor counters call for "representative" judges
Andrew Marin Has A New Boyfriend
Australia's SBS Television Focuses on Uganda
Featured Reports
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than two hundred posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
homer
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
I guess I’m a bad bad gay because I don’t have a rifle or sniper scope.
Scott P.
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
This is sickening.
There will be violence generated by this video, but it will be directed against gay people.
David C.
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
Of course, that’s the idea, and if it isn’t physical violence, it will be violence at the ballot box, and likely both. That is what the purveyors of this kind of crap are hoping for and crave (but would deny). Though pathetic, pathological, and preposterous, there will be people that will take the bait, hook, line, and sinker. Hard to say who is the real culprit in that.
Attmay
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
These people are monsters. If Jesus were alive, he’d be leading the mob to tar and feather them.
cowboy
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
The America Forever ad in the newspaper and their “anti-species” t-shirt and now this video… it makes you wonder:
We are getting under THEIR skin. They’re worried. They are seeing our potential success for gaining equality and these are their desperate attempts to thwart our advances with an increasingly sympathetic populace.
Bruce Garrett
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
Yes…we in the Homosexual Conspiracy have been working patiently on The Gay Agenda for many decades. It was We who conspired many years ago to end the school year before Father’s Day, so there would be no Father’s Day celebrations in school. Our cunning plan was a complete success. Or would have been if it wasn’t for you meddling kids…
Thank you Jim, for another good catch of how devious the anti-gay propagandists are. That little tidbit is actually, to my mind, way more telling then the crosshairs.
The Story So Far… » Blog Archive » How The Game Is Played…(continued)
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
[...] Jim Burroway makes a good catch I’d missed when looking at the new anti-gay ad campaign created by Campaign Secrets…the one that shows an unseen gay sniper putting a family and more specifically their little children in the crosshairs. This one is good…it really says it all… [...]
Louie
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
I hope that ALL of us in the gay community have learned our bitter lessons from the California Prop. 8 battle that we lost.
These “Christians” will lie, cheat, steal, extort and do WHATEVER IT TAKES to enact legislation AGAINST members of the entire LGBT community.
We cannot allow these people to control the debate and malign us with impunity.
We cannot sit back and allow ourselves to think that nobody will actually “buy” what these people are selling. Because as we all learned in the bitter lessons of Prop. 8, Prop. 102, Amendment 2 and Act 1, the electorate WILL believe these things hook, line and sinker!
NO MORE NICE GAY!
Ben in Oakland
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
Louie–better to say no more closet, no more closet campaigns.
The closet was the reaosn we lost on 8, not the anti-gays. We cooperated with them by sraying in the closet in the campaign.
Regan DuCasse
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
Fear based ads won the Prop. 8 campaign. And there is nothing so profoundly bad as fear based public policy.
No court or leader who cares to be taken seriously or person who cares about their duty to the public should allow such things.
Especially against a minority that’s already been maligned and defamed so much, not even 15 year old gay students are safe from cold blooded execution at school, nor straight brothers walking home together who happen to be affectionate towards each other.
Fear and violence are not the tools of the gay community for being believed and respected, so how can they be blamed for it?
David C.
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
This presumes that the leaders in question are principled. I would be more likely to trust jurists (judges). The nonsense about “activist judges” was manufactured by right-wing ideologues.
Every smear tactic has and will be used against gay people. It is up to us to ensure that we rise above such tactics and not give into the temptation to become just like our oppressors. Nevertheless, we must be firm, vigilant, and work to be heard.
Stefano A
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
Cowboy:
This is a bit of a distraction, but regarding America Forever that you mentioned . . .
Sandra Rodriguez and Jonas Filho (who filed the incorporation papers for the foundation) have broken the law in two ways with America Forever and that ad: First, the non-profit is operating illegally, the incorporation papers for the foundation lapsed in 2007; Second, thus they’re asking for financial donations for a no longer recognized nonprofit, and even if their non-profit status hadn’t lapsed it’s illegal for the type of nonprofit they registered as with the State Dept of Commerce to take money for use for political purposes.
Louie
February 16th, 2009 | LINK
If these people don’t care what God says “Love your neighbor”, then I’m sure they could care less about what the law of man says “lapsed corporation”.
They don’t care and there are people in positions of power that will simply look the other way and not prosecute them equally under the law!
We need to stop with the focus groups and polling, etc.
WWHMD!?!?!?
What Would Harvey Milk Do?
Leave A Comment