February 17th, 2009
Utah House Bill 267 would have banned discrimination in employment and housing based on sexual orientation. Naturally, Utah legislators couldn’t have that.
Sponsored by Rep. Christine Johnson, D-Salt Lake City, HB267 is part of the Common Ground Initiative, a legislative push for legal protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Utahns. Johnson called the decision to kill her bill in committee an “endorsement of discrimination.”
…Opponents argued the bill was part of a wider gay “agenda” aimed at undermining Utah’s Amendment 3, which forbids same-sex marriage.
According to Republican representatives James Dunnigan, Gage Froerer, Kevin Garn, Francis Gibson, Todd Kiser, Michael Morley, Patrick Painter, and R. Curt Webb, it is perfectly acceptable to fire someone because you suspect they may be gay. And that person should have no recourse whatsoever.
It’s an odd feeling to know that some people don’t want you to be able to support yourself or have a roof over your head because you are gay. And its frightening to know that a majority of Utah’s legislators support those people.
Utah is a very scary place.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Joel
February 17th, 2009
Their mormons, what would u expect. Religious ppl are the slowest to change.
Stefano A
February 17th, 2009
I would like to say I’m surprised. But I’m not. What is so infuriating is the reason “it’s a choice” when so is their relgion.
I am seriously wondering if a better tactic in Utah would be for advocates to stop legislating for LGBT protections and start petitioning to remove religious protections. Maybe then people would begin to better understand the irrationality of their “choice” argument.
The adoption bill that failed is a bit more complicated. Just as archaic, it failed not only because of anti-gay sentiments, but the self-righteous attitude toward unmarried heterosexuals stemming back to the prejudicial days of “bastard children”.
I agree, Utah is a scary place. So is Tennessee. Both states I have gone out of my way to avoid when travelling.
At the same time, with regard to anti-discrimination measures for employment and housing, I can’t say Ohio has been much better (excepting city-level protections). But I’m still holding out hope for EHEA this year and hate-crime changes.
In Utah, I don’t expect the final bill to be passed either for hospital visitation, medical decisions or inheritance rights to pass either.
I think it’s been more than clear that (a) the Mormon church and other religious folk will see any recognition of gay couples as being against heterosexual marriage, and (b) in the same vein, any rights at all would require them to back off their self-righteous and self-serving religious arguments and admit how they’ve conflated church and state issues.
Mark C
February 18th, 2009
If President Obama passes ENDA and other anti-discrimination laws designed to protect LGBT people, wouldn’t it be the end of state-level laws allowing discrimination against us?
We have an advocate in the White House now – let’s focus our efforts on supporting him on a broader scale with initiatives like overturning the Federal DOMA and force the states to comply with Federal regulations.
Scott P.
February 18th, 2009
Mark C, federal trumps state law, but don’t hold your breath for anything from Obama.
Mark F.
February 19th, 2009
Actually, just because you oppose anti-discrimination laws does not mean you find anti-gay discrimination to be acceptable. This is a fallacy. I oppose ALL anti-discrimination laws because I favor absolute freedom of association.
Mark F.
February 19th, 2009
As far as I know, it’s illegal for gay people to discriminate against religious bigots in employment or housing. Why should this be? Why shouldn’t I be able to refuse to rent an apartment to a bigot or hire them just like I’m allowed to boycott a bigot’s business?
Timothy Kincaid
February 19th, 2009
Mark F,
I’ll buy that argument on the day in which those who say “no” to gay anti-discrimination laws introduce legislation to do away with religion based anti-discrimination laws. Oddly enough, that never seems to happen.
And in the case of Utah… it actually is true that the state Legislature has unquestionably given permission – if not downright encouragement – for blatant anti-gay discrimination.
Leave A Comment