Not Just Box Turtles — Robots, Too

Jim Burroway

March 7th, 2009

The blog’s name refers to a statement attributed to Texas Sen. John Cornyn, “Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife.” Rick Santorum cited dogs. With Bill O’Reilly, it was ducks and goats. Now you can add robots — yes, robots! — to the list:

David Gibbs III, a lawyer who in 2005 fought to keep brain-damaged Terri Schiavo on life support, told rally participants gay marriage would “open the door to unusual marriage in North Carolina. “Why not polygamy, or three or four spouses?” Gibbs asked. “Maybe people will want to marry their pets or robots.”

[Hat tip: Pam Spaulding]

John

March 7th, 2009

Well, if those “robots” look anything like some of the cylons on Battlestar Gallactica, sign me up. Although truth be told, the female cylons are way hotter than most of the male cylons (and that is coming from a gay guy).

Tommy

March 7th, 2009

HEY! I would be all over Sam Anders like a Cylon polymer on a cracked bulkhead.

Eddie89

March 7th, 2009

Domo Arigato, Mister Roboto!

Lynn David

March 8th, 2009

He also said pets. Lot of lee-way with that word. It could mean (inclusive of box turtles) such things as:

Gerbils
Hamsters
Rats
Mice
Tarantulas
Snakes
Lizards
Cats
Raccoons
Parrot, Parakeets and other birds
Pot-bellied Pigs
Echidnas
Sugar-gliders
Squirrels
Madagascar Hissing Cockroaches
Goats
Alligators and other crocodilians
Fish
Octupus and Squid
Bears
Lions, Tigers, Cougars, etc.
Scorpions

You name it! Which makes this guy even sicker. Or draws into question what some people keep for pets.

Jason D

March 8th, 2009

Tommy, Anders is nice, and Tyrol is okay, too.

Tara TASW

March 8th, 2009

One of the downsides of being GLBTQ is that you learn waaaaaaay too much about the sexual fantasies of right-wing wackjobs.

Duncan

March 9th, 2009

Most of the robots that I have to talked to about this say they would not want to be stuck in a biology-based, religion-shaped institution, as they usually express contempt for both. Some say that ‘computed’ love cannot be captured by such a crude legal format, that they would rather start their own customs anew, and a few insist that it is not proper artificial intelligence which bends to the natural sort. All agree that they would never consider having a bio as a partner.
The process is at the start. You know how it works.

Graham Shevlin

March 9th, 2009

Do these idiots not understand the legal concept of informed consent, or are they merely utterly dishonest?

TJ McFisty

March 9th, 2009

I’ll never look at my Roomba the same way again.

homer

March 9th, 2009

I guess I will have to call off my planned wedding to CP3O. Whoever sent that case of WD40, I need the receipt so I can return it to the AutoPlex.

Eddie89

March 9th, 2009

OMG! C3PO is such a queen!

I would MUCH rather marry Terminator!

Now he’s a robot’s robot!

Trevor

March 11th, 2009

Not to open a whole new can of worms but if artificial intelligence progresses to the point that an android is capable of giving informed consent then they need to be given the same civil rights as humans. Otherwise you’re just begging for trouble. If you think a bunch of gays in California caused trouble after prop 8 passed just imagine if they all had the strength of 10 gorillas and no remorse! The same civil rights would also apply to any other sentient being that comes to earth. Its only fair.

PSUdain

March 19th, 2009

Why no love for John Cavil?? (Kidding) Anders maybe, but not in a tank of goo. But I do think you’re giving Leoben too little credit.

By the bye, I love the dorkiness of this thread. “Like Cylon polymer on a cracked bulkhead.” HA! I really did titter out loud at that.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Emphasis Mine

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1980: Tickets, Tux, and a Court Order -- A Male Couple Attends Senior Prom

Born On This Day, 1926: Christine Jorgenson

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1965: Second White House Protest

Today In History, 1981: "Polyester" Premieres

Today In History, 1987: Barney Frank Comes Out

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.