Vermont Senate Judiciary Approves Civil Marriage

Timothy Kincaid

March 20th, 2009

From the A/P:

A state Senate committee unanimously approved a gay marriage bill on Friday, moving Vermont one step closer to allowing same-sex couples to legally wed.

“It provides … gay and lesbian couples the same rights that I have as a married heterosexual,” said Sen. John Campbell, vice chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and chief sponsor of the bill.

The measure would replace Vermont’s first-in-the-nation civil unions law with one that allows marriage of same-sex partners beginning Sept. 1.

For some reason, Vermont seems to be the only state who’s website does not give one immediate access to the member of various committees so I can’t report on to what extent this was a bi-partisan decision. However, we know that at least one Republican voted yes.

Friday’s committee vote followed the panel’s rejection of an amendment proposed by Sen. Kevin Mullin, R-Rutland, that would have put the gay marriage question to a statewide referendum next March. After the amendment was defeated, Mullin joined his colleagues in voting 5-0 for the bill.

Should there be sufficient bi-partisan support, Republican Governor Jim Douglas may feel it best to sign the bill.

Timothy (TRiG)

March 20th, 2009

Would this be the first time it passed by legislation rather than court order?

TRiG.

Lindoro

March 20th, 2009

Timothy:

No. California, for what I understand, twice passed legislation making marriage available and it was twice vetoed by the Governator. We all know how much he is regretting that one.

Lindoro

Stefano A

March 20th, 2009

For some reason, Vermont seems to be the only state who’s website does not give one immediate access to the member of various committees so I can’t report on to what extent this was a bi-partisan decision. However, we know that at least one Republican voted yes.

The only Republican on the Judiciary Committee is Mullin.

The members of the Senate Judiciary Committe are:
Senator Sears of Bennington District, Chair (Democrat)
Senator Campbell of Windsor District, Vice-Chair (Democrat)
Senator Cummings of Washington District (Democrat)
Senator Mullin of Rutland District (Republican)
Senator Nitka of Windsor District, Clerk (Democrat)

Stefano A

March 20th, 2009

Senate Standing Committees: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/legdir/comms.cfm?Body=S

Legislative Directory: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/legdir/legdir2.htm
Variaious Links for the House and Sentate including a link to the Standing Committees of the House/Sentate and the Senators/House Reps listed by Name or District)

Senators Listed Alphabestically: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/lms/legdir/alpha.asp?Body=S

Stefano A

March 20th, 2009

TRiG

Would this be the first time it passed by legislation rather than court order?

In Vermont you mean? Or in general?

The civil unions were passed by legislature, but this would be the first time SSM has been passed without a court order in any state if Vermont votes “yes”.

Tavdy

March 21st, 2009

TRiG, it would be the first time SSM has been legalised by a US legislature, but either the sixth or (if the Swedish Riksdag gets in first) seventh time internationally.

Six countries have legalised SSM so far (Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway) while the legislature of one is debating it (Sweden) and the legislatures of two more will do so in the near future (Nepal, Scotland). Legalisation involved the Courts in three of these – Canada, ZA and Nepal. ZA is the only one where the legislature was not involved – marriage equality there was gained automatically when Cape Town chose not to act on Bloemfontein’s offer of civil unions as an alternative to SSM.

Stefano A

March 21st, 2009

I’d forgotten that, actually, the California Legislature passed AB 849 2005, which would make it the first bill legalizing same-sex marriage without a court order. The problem was Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger who immediately vetoed the legislation.

Louie

March 21st, 2009

The problem in California was that the Governator felt that he could not sign the bill because of Prop. 22 being passed by the voters back in 2000. Which was then struck down by the CA Supereme Court in 2008.

Which was then passed again in 2008 under Prop. 8, except by a much small margin (4%) vs. 2000

So, if Prop. 22 hadn’t been passed in 2000, would Schwarzenegger have signed the bill? Or would he have come up with some other excuse?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

UN Human Rights Council Creates Its First LGBT Rights Watchdog

Pentagon Ends Ban On Transgender Service Members

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1904: Census Bureau Releases Incarceration Statistics on Sodomy

Today In History, 1969: The New York Times Takes Another Crack At Stonewall

Today In History, 1969: Upper West Side's Renaissance Blighted by "Parading Homosexuals"

Today In History, 1986: Supreme Court Upholds Sodomy Laws in Bowers v. Hardwick

Today In History, 1987: Presidential Advisor Urges Reagan: No Homos On AIDS Commission

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.