Governor Douglas to Veto Vermont’s Marriage Bill

Timothy Kincaid

March 25th, 2009

Governor Jim Douglas (R) has now given a statement about the effort of legislators to enact marriage equality in Vermont. The bill has passed the Senate by an overwhelming majority and is now being considered by the House.

Gov. Jim Douglas, R-Vermont, says he will veto the same-sex marriage bill. He made the public announcement this afternoon.

We will now watch to see if the House passes this bill with a veto-proof (2/3) majority. Should all those members of the House who are in the Progressive Party and the Democratic Party vote for the bill, they will have over two-thirds without requiring any support from Republicans or Independants. About half of the Republicans in the Senate voted for marriage.

Duncan

March 25th, 2009

Activist governors ignoring the will of the majority?

Ben in Oakland

March 25th, 2009

The good governor says he wants to focus on the economy. Marriage equaklity might help with that, but it’s disingenuous. The legislature is already focussing on marriage equality.
I ohpe they pass it over his veto.

He’s given me yet another reason– as if I needed one– never to vote for a Republican.

MaskedBandit

March 25th, 2009

Agreed, Ben. While some of the younger Republicans get it (like Meghan McCain), the ones that actually have power have made a concerted effort to alienate anyone who supports equal rights.

I’ll treat them like I do American auto manufacturers: after I get burned, I’ll never return to that brand.

David C.

March 25th, 2009

Governor Douglas could get a pass by announcing his intent to veto the bill before the House vote. He comes out “clean” to his conservative Republican base if he is effectively cut out of the loop by a 2/3’s majority, and as a bonus (to him), SSM activists have a smaller target to hit.

I hope for the veto-proof majority, even if it does essentially take Douglas off the hook to some extent. Vermont SSM activists want SSM rights, not just the consolation prize of forcing Douglas to act and show himself to be an enemy of SSM indeed.

Bruno

March 25th, 2009

I do think Gov. Douglas wants to toe the party line (although in Vermont I’m not sure it’s the Republican party line as much as elsewhere) without taking on the huge burden of letting himself be the only scapegoat for preventing SSM. It sounds to me like he’s taking the chance that by reporting his intentions early, he hopes the House will make sure to pass the legislation in a veto-proof manner. However, this could backfire if they don’t, as he’ll end up being vilified by the Vermont LGBT community and likely will face plummeting approval ratings.

Dave

March 25th, 2009

Duncan:

Activist governors ignoring the will of the majority?

Um, governors are political leaders, same as legislators. They are supposed to be activists.

Dave

March 25th, 2009

Ben in Oakland:

He’s given me yet another reason– as if I needed one– never to vote for a Republican.

Myself, I never vote for Democrats.

Ben in Oakland

March 25th, 2009

I wouldn’t either if I had any choice. As I have always said, the only party worse for the country than the democrats are the republicans.

David

March 25th, 2009

MaskedBandit:

Ben: Try learning how to spell: your political thoughts might then carry a bit more weight among those of us who can.

Not That David

March 25th, 2009

David:
You wrote
“Ben: Try learning how to spell: your political thoughts might then carry a bit more weight among those of us who can.”

Empty dismissals like that indicate a lack of any substantive argument. Your “political thoughts” would have more weight if they contained a substantive, rational argument, instead of niggling nitpickery and creepy carping.

Ben in Oakland made reasonable points – marriage equality is an element of the economy, since marriage facilitates measurable economic security for those allowed to enter into the contract, depriving same-sex couples disadvantages them economically, and the business of throwing weddings is very lucrative.

Further, the Governor’s willingness to harm same-sex couples, standard practice for Republicans, is a valid reason not to vote for him, or other Republican candidates. If he is willing to harm one group of people, it is reasonable to assume that he is a risk to others as well. Further, his zero-sum game mentality is incompetence made manifest in a society as complex as ours is today.

Attmay

March 26th, 2009

I will never vote for a heterosexual of any political party.

Ben in Oakland

March 26th, 2009

The problem is not that i need to learn how to spell, i need to be able to type better than i do.

Attmay

March 26th, 2009

Does VT have a recall system in place?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Born On This Day, 1951: Chris Smith, Baron Smith of Finsbury

Born On This Day, 1952: Gus Van Sant

Born On This Day, 1965: Kirk Andrew Murphy

Clinton Pays Private Visit With Pulse Families, Pays Respects To Victims

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1987: Reagan Names Gay Man To AIDS Commission

Born On This Day, 1816: Charlotte Saunders Cushman

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.