Photos Taken of Me as a Teenager

Timothy Kincaid

May 5th, 2009

See Updates Below

Carrie Prejean, Miss California, has issued a statement seeking to deflect criticism about presenting herself as a model of Christian virtue in the light of top-less pictures that have begun to hit the internet.

I am a Christian, and I am a model. Models pose for pictures, including lingerie and swimwear photos. Recently, photos taken of me as a teenager have been released surreptitiously to a tabloid Web site that openly mocks me for my Christian faith. I am not perfect, and I will never claim to be. But these attacks on me and others who speak in defense of traditional marriage are intolerant and offensive. While we may not agree on every issue, we should show respect for others’ opinions and not try to silence them through vicious and mean-spirited attacks.

I wondered at this particular explanation. Whoever wrote this for Carrie (clearly not Carrie herself) made a point of saying the nudie pics were taken when she was a teenager. But Prejean is only 21. So the pics are, asuming they aren’t kiddie porn, two to three years old.

But those who have seen the unrevealed pictures say they appear to be after her quite recent breast enhancement. If it turns out that these are more recent pictures, then what remaining shreds of dignity that Prejean has managed to hold onto will dissipate entirely.

UPDATE

The PR firms statement that Carrie’s pictures were “as a teenager” may possibly have something to do with the contract she entered into with the Miss California USA Pageant. A/P reports:

Pageant spokesman Roger Neal said Tuesday it appears the 21-year-old Prejean has run afoul of several sections of the 12-page contract prospective contestants were required to sign before competing in the state contest.

The contract contains a clause asking participants whether they have conducted themselves “in accordance with the highest ethical and moral standards” and if they’ve ever been photographed nude or partially nude.

Access Holywood has more:

On Monday, photos surfaced on TheDirty.com showing a topless Carrie Prejean posing provocatively. However, Carrie quickly responded to the photos, claiming she was only 17 years old when the pictures were taken.

But was Carrie\’s claim a strategic move since many media outlets would not likely air underage nudity?

Today, Access Hollywood uncovered evidence, which may put her age at over 18 when the photos were taken.

The Miss California USA organization told Access they were “shocked” by the photo and said they believe the images were shot between the time of now-21-year-old Carrie\’s breast augmentation and the Miss USA Pageant, which would be roughly 10 weeks ago.

For “a Christian”, Prejean seems to have a shocking disregard for honesty and for someone so very concerned about marriage, she seems to have a rather cavalier attitude about contracts.

UPDATE 2:

TMZ has a handwritten note from Carrie claiming that they were taken before she turned 18. They don’t think that she appears in these images to be the same age as she does in pictures taken when she was Miss Teen California prior to her 18th birthday.

Tavdy

May 5th, 2009

I am a Christian

If you’re going to make a statement of some significance it is generally considered unwise to start with something that is such a blatant lie.

kevin

May 5th, 2009

If she did take them at 17, then shouldn’t whoever took them and who is distributing them be charged with child pornography?

Ephilei

May 5th, 2009

No offensive to anyone, but in my country, in my family, I do believe plastic boobs should be between a woman and her husband, who may be repressing his secret, gay feelings. God gave insurance benefits to heterosexuals so we can run for meaningless public offices like Ms CA. Just because I voted to force couples in my state to divorce, doesn’t mean you can call me mean words. Don’t be intolerant of my intolerance. It’s not Christian, like me.

Elizabeth

May 5th, 2009

“for someone so very concerned about marriage, she seems to have a rather cavalier attitude about contracts.”

To add, internet porn seems like a far bigger threat to marriage than allowing gays in on the institution…

cd

May 5th, 2009

She’s finding out the hard way that she’s not going to get the career she thought she was entitled to.

The world can be very cruel. But your individual illusions and choices figure greatly in the particulars of what happens.

Candace

May 5th, 2009

Uh-oh, busted.

Wilson

May 5th, 2009

Didn’t she talk about “the way she was raised” in regard to wanting to deny gay and lesbian couples the ability to get married?

If she was posing for such pictures of her own accord, at 17 (God forbid), 18, or 19, what does that say about “the way she was raised”?

And, very seriously, isn’t PORN a SERIOUS problem for heterosexual marriage? Compare that to the non-problem of homosexual marriage.

If she is doing “lingerie modeling” to actually sell lingerie (or “swimwear modeling” for that swimsuit she was half taking-off), she is posing precisely for the sexual arousal of heterosexual men… And Prejean is sexually arousing these men instead of these men’s wives.

Umambiguous hypocrisy.

AdrianT

May 5th, 2009

I’m surprised, after all the accolades for this bombshell from the religious right, we have had no word from Jimmy Swaggart. Given his history, I would have thought he would be the first to compliment her….

RU486

May 5th, 2009

Looks like Miss C’s 15 minutes are up. I’m sorry, too, ’cause she’s such a disaster, she’s working for our side now.

The Lauderdale

May 5th, 2009

Either the Prejean picture is porn, in which case it is underage porn and Box Turtle Bulletin shouldn’t be showing it, or it isn’t porn.

I tend toward the latter. That said, it’s still tacky and in breach of her contract.

Buffy

May 5th, 2009

She digs herself in deeper by the minute.

John

May 5th, 2009

I can’t imagine a worse lie to cover up a contract violation than to claim instead that it is kiddie porn. I do think this shoudl be referred to the US Justice Department for investigation.

Jess

May 5th, 2009

I find it interesting how often the term “mean-spirited” is used by people who oppose same sex marriage, to describe people who are for same sex marriage. Sure, Perez called her a name, but, she told him and the rest of the GLBT community that we should not have equal rights. I find it really creepy that the defense they conjure up for our outrage is “You’re a meanie.” Note, that’s not a direct quote, but you get the gist.

Christopher Waldrop

May 6th, 2009

Jess, that’s exactly what bugs me about the same-sex marriage debate and many other debates as well. Prejean and others claim they want open debate, but when anyone criticizes their position they cry foul. Criticism does not mean Prejean and others are being silenced, and if it did, she and other opponents of same-sex marriage would be at least as guilty, since they don’t want the issue to be debated at all. They only want the right to criticize and even (gasp!) mock supporters of same-sex marriage. They just don’t want anyone doing the same to them.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.