Miss California Executive Director Quits

Timothy Kincaid

May 13th, 2009

Moakler is the one that doesn't look like a drag queen

Moakler is the one that doesn't look like a drag queen

Shanna Moakler is not pleased with the decision by Donald Trump to let Carrie Prejean keep her title as Miss California USA. She believed that when pictures surfaced that proved that Prejean had lied about posing topless and when Prejean cut off all contact with the Miss California Pageant in order to engage in a devisive anti-gay campaign that she was no longer able to carry out her duties.

Donald Trump disagreed. Approaching the controversy from a businessman-owner’s perspective, he was less concerned about role-models and pageantry and more interested in whether Prejean was beautiful (which he repeated several times) and with how the controversy impacted him.

Today Moakler decided she could no longer participate in an institution that undercut her efforts. She released a statement to US Magazine:

“I cannot with a clear conscious move forward supporting and promoting the Miss Universe Organization when I no longer believe in it, or the contracts I signed committing myself as a youth,” she continues. “I want to be a role model for young woman with high hopes of pageantry, but now feel it more important to be a role model for my children. I am sorry and hope I have not let any young supporters down but wish them the best of luck in fulfilling their dreams.”

Priya Lynn

May 13th, 2009

That move by Donald Trump just shows his total lack of integrity. Prejean wasn’t fullfilling her duties as Miss California and was ignoring attempts to contact her to rectify the situtation. By all rights she should have been fired – any average person would have been canned from their job if they had acted the same way. Trump must have been thinking with his crotch.

banshiii

May 13th, 2009

sad fn state of affairs.
We wish her the best.
Donald? principles?
riiight.

Swampfox

May 13th, 2009

“Moakler is the one that doesn’t look like a drag queen” caption on the photograph.

Can’t we refrain from such remarks.

Swampfox

May 13th, 2009

I will further remark that Moakler is very nice looking ………. and, Prejean is giving a plastic beauty contestant smile. Moakler did the honorable thing and resigned.

Jason D

May 13th, 2009

swamp, if you know any drag queens, the idea with their makeup is loud, loud, loud. In many respects, drag artists are mocking the amount of forced beauty that straight men expect of real women.

Case in point: Carrie Prejean.

Swampfox

May 13th, 2009

The caption is used as a slur. I rest my case.

Jason D

May 13th, 2009

yeah, a slur against an overly-made up homophobe. Eeek.

David C.

May 13th, 2009

I suspect this is the classic clash of wills between an owner/boss and a subordinate. The principled Moakler Vs. the bottom-line focused businessman Trump.

Been there, done that, got the coffee cup, and T-shirt.

Désirée

May 13th, 2009

Perhaps the Donald is actually being quite shrewd here. Had he fired her, Carrie and her new handlers could claim martyrdom at the hands of the gay maffia or some such distortion of the facts. However, by basically forcing her to honor her pageant duties, he takes away her ability to play the martyr. Now, if she continues to act as she has been – ignoring pageant officials, joining political causes, etc, he can fire her and not look bad doing so and she can’t claim it was because of the evil gays or that she is being punished. It will be because she isn’t doing her job. Donald is a shrewd business man to be sure and I’m sure he thought this through. Carrie not getting canned now is actually better for everyone *except* Carrie and the anti-equality crowd that wanted to use her.

Ephilei

May 14th, 2009

Desiree makes a very good point. Injuring Carrie would have made her talking points stronger (even for being less correct).

Didn’t Moakler also post nude, violating her contract? If the org was playing by their own rules, they’d have fired both of them.

cd

May 14th, 2009

I think Trump is doing the socially and politically smart thing, too. Ms. Prejean is going supernova- selfdestructing in the public eye- and he’d be a fool to make himself a party to it. He’s letting her disqualify and degrade herself in the public eye, not giving her and her supporters a target to blame and attack.

Ms. Moakler…it seems to me this is a final straw kind of thing internal to the beauty pageant biz and culture. It’s not that the pageants are passé in the American public mind, yet. But there is a change of some kind in American culture, such that pageant contestants are no longer given quite the iconic status they once were. The public is no longer so willfully overlooking the messy and ugly sides of what goes on.

Tiff

May 14th, 2009

“yeah, a slur against an overly-made up homophobe. Eeek”

I believe the issue is that drag queen is being used as a slur. It’s the same reason it’s inappropriate to say something like “That movie was so gay!”

I echo swampfox’s statement: “Can’t we refrain from such remarks.”

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

FBI Reports Massive Surge In Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes in 2015

Baptist General Convention of Texas Warns Churches in Dallas and Austin Over LGBT Inclusion

Trump Selects Alt-Right Nationalist As "Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor"

WITNESS: Bean Blossom, Indiana

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.