Iowans couldn't care less about gay marriage
A Personal Note
Military Times poll shows sharp decline in support for DADT
Today's Question
Our condolences to the Burke family
"Family" Leader Reportedly Confirms Opposition to Uganda's Anti-Gay BIll
Ollie North: Repeal DADT and What's Next? NAMBLA and Same-Sex Marriage
Michigan Christians sue because the Matthew Shepherd Act restricts their rights. They must want to violently attack gay people
Featured Reports
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than two hundred posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
Posts 
Posts via daily email:
As I noted earlier, President Barack Obama remained silent on the Supreme Court ruling which validated Proposition 8 at a fundraising event in Los Angeles. But he did manage to make a very oblique reference to the hundreds of LGBT people and allies protesting outside last night:
Matt
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
Just for the sake of asking- if we’re so tired of dealing with DADT and not being able to get any action out of DC, what’s stopping us from forming our own version of Blackwater?
Timothy Kincaid
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
Am I the only one had a physical reaction to reading that? Did anyone else find that flippancy to be astonishingly offensive?
It is simply impossible for the President’s staff to not to know the nature of the gay “welcome” (protest). To make light of it tells me loud and clear that this President – at least last night – not only has no intention of keeping his promises but that he has contempt for me for even thinking he would.
I’m beginning to think that we are a joke to this President.
Bruno
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
If he’s being quoted correctly, it’s very disconcerting. At some point this will have to come to a head and he’ll have to address us. Or maybe not, I mean, most of us will still vote for him anyway.
CPT_Doom
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
I have already left a comment on the White House’s site, and unsubscribed from the Obama mailing list. If he is so willing to joke about the greatest threat to civil rights since the end of Jim Crow (the stripping of Constitutional rights of a minority through simply majority vote), then it is clear he is not serious about his alleged support for the LGBT community.
I always said I supported Obama in spite of his positions on LGBT rights, but now I am simply too angry to be sanguine. If he is willing to abandon us – doing NOTHING for the LGBT community except for inviting us to the Easter Egg Roll – then he clearly does not need my help on health care reform, banking reform or any other thing. Hell, the man has not even issued a proclamation for Gay Pride month.
Alex
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
I had a similar reaction, Timothy. And I wish I hadn’t voted for him.
John
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
I have been sending an email to the White House each day that I read or hear something in particular related to inaction on the Obama agenda for gay Americans. I encourage everyone else to do the same as well as pester their senators and representatives.
As an Obama voter and campaign contributer, I have been getting more and more angry about this administration’s ignoring of gay and lesbian Americans. However, for the President himself to just blow us off like this really angers me. He has a serious problem with a portion of the electorate that voted in large numbers for him. His election was an anomaly. Most of our elections have been much closer. If he feels comfortable with people like me just not voting (I can’t imagine that I would actually vote for anyone put forward by the current Republican party), he may have more difficulty winning a second term than he thinks.
Helen in Ireland
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
I just left this comment on the White House web site. I am so sorry for all those who faced the bitter disappointment yesterday and I only wish I could do more to help you all.
Jim and Timothy, I took the list from BTB, I hope that you don’t mind.
Helen
*****
President Obama,
Today, just one day after the California Supreme Court upheld a voter’s ballot that stripped a large group of California men and women of the civil and equals rights previously acknowledged by that same court, you attended a fundraising event in Los Angeles. A number of those men and women protested that court decision, holding placards and banners aloft. Within the hotel, whilst addressing the paying guests, you are reported as saying:
“One of them said, ‘Obama keep your promise,’ ” the president said. “I thought that’s fair. I don’t know which promise he was talking about.”
Those promises were to address:-
Hate crimes statute
Employment Non-Discrimination
Civil Unions/Federal rights
Repeal ‘Defense of Marriage Act’
Repeal ‘Don’t Ask. Don’t Tell’
Expand Adoption rights
Promote AIDS prevention
Microbicides development act
These were listed on your Inaugauration day on this website.
You can do it. You *can* act, to prevent Dan Choi and other service members from being thrown out of the career they loved; You *can* speak out in favour of those who lost their right to protect their families within the bounds of civil marriage in California. You *can* speak out against those so-called ‘religious right’ who commit so many lies and calumny to further their own selfish agenda.
You *can* – but you haven’t and you don’t. I am writing from Europe, fom Ireland in fact, as a heterosexual woman who supports the civil rights of gay, bisexual and transgendered men and women in my own company and across the world. I support the Americans who put their faith in you and voted for you, only to be greeted with today’s derision and yesterday’s silence.
They deserve better. America deserves better. And in 2012, you will reap what you have sown in that silence.
Shame on you, Mr President. Shame on you.
Pomo
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
to be fair, he’s made hundreds of promises he hasn’t kept… maybe he really didn’t know which ones the protestors were talking about.
But I also feel this is an appropriate opportunity to say “I told you so” to all my fellow GLBTers who believe you must vote Democrat if you are gay.
Richard Culen
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
Mr. President:
Please keep your promises about “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. AFter all, you are the Commander-IN-Chief. Surely at least, you can temporarily suspend this “permission to lie” rule that is now on the books. Also, your silence is deafening in the discrimation on allowing Gays to marry. Even if you do not agree, it is unconstitutional. You owe it to ALL oppressed people to administer the Constitution that protects people’s basic rights. You cannot carve out a whole class of people and deny them rights that the Constitution protects. WHERE IS YOUR VOICE ON THIS ??????
werdna
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
Is it possible that this is another example of his well-known capacity for self-deprecation? There are plenty of promises he hasn’t made good on yet besides the ones made on LGBT issues.
Here’s the video:
http://www.politico.com/singletitlevideo.html?bcpid=1155201977&bctid=24514900001
Also Jim, your link doesn’t in fact mention anything about “hundreds of LGBT people and allies protesting,” but only “a gaggle of sign-waving protestors [sic]” whose concerns are not specified. I’m not saying things aren’t as you described, just that the link doesn’t support that.
a. mcewen
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
On one hand, I still like Obama better than McCain.
Of course on the other, he really needs to say something.
Although on what he said, I will give him the benefit of the doubt. He may not have known what the question was about. We are witnessing Obama’s big weakness – when he makes a joke, it always bites him on the ass.
a. mcewen
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
Not defending President Obama’s silence but this link gives a different picture of the incident – http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/5/28/736393/-Obama-Doesnt-Mock-Gay-Rights-Protestors-at-CA-Fundraiser.(Updated)
Swampfox
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
All I can say is that I did not vote for my current President, but I pray for him.
Matt
May 28th, 2009 | LINK
My email to Whitehouse.gov:
Dear President Obama,
I was very disturbed by the recent comments you made at yesterday’s fundraiser in Los Angeles. Specifically, I am referring to your comment where you described a group of protesters outside who were urging you to keep your promise, to which you replied, “I can’t remember which promise” the protesters were talking about.
Allow me to remind you of the promises you made to the gay and lesbian community during the course of your campaign:
*You promised to support legislation expanding hate crime status to include GLBT Americans. So far, you have been silent on this issue.
*You promised to support legislation promoting employment non-discrimination. So far, you have been silent on this issue.
*You promised to end the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy of our country’s military. So far, you have continued to SUPPORT this policy by not intervening of the discharges of Daniel Choi and other gay and lesbian soldiers.
*You promised to support marriage equality by supporting legislation to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act. So far you have been silent on this issue, even as states like Iowa, Vermont and Maine enact marriage equality protections of their own and even while the legal battle over marriage equality in California continues.
I could go on, but these are the main promises which you made to our community but have not yet kept. We in the GLBT community are tired of politicians begging for our vote and then throwing us aside once they’re sworn in.
During your campaign, you often spoke of the “fierce urgency of now” that motivated you to act to help fix our country. Sadly, on the issues that are important to me and the GLBT community, this urgency seems to have been replaced by “the lazy urgency of when it’s convenent”
It is time to KEEP YOUR WORD and fulfill these promises to us.
Chris
May 29th, 2009 | LINK
During the Primary, I became convinced that Obama is no friend of the GLBT Community. He will side for us when it is convenient for him to do so.
Hillary, on the other hand, is not only an active supporter of our Community, she will support us even when it is NOT convenient to do so.
toujoursdan
May 29th, 2009 | LINK
From what friends tell me there were several demonstrations going on at the same time. The Armenian genocide demonstration was as large as the anti-Prop 8 demonstration. With that in mind, it may have not been flippant.
(I am no Obamabot. I had no expectations that he would do much for the gay community and have not been disappointed. I don’t think Hilary would have been any better. Both are still miles about McCain/Palin, though. )
Donna
May 29th, 2009 | LINK
Pomo, you said:
“But I also feel this is an appropriate opportunity to say “I told you so” to all my fellow GLBTers who believe you must vote Democrat if you are gay.”
While we are severely disappointed in Obama’s inaction, a McCain presidency would have been even worse for GLBTQ people.
McCain would have not only ignored furthering gay rights, but would have probably rolled back rights we already have.
So Obama’s not a godsend, but he’s a hell of a lot better than McCain/Palin.
Timothy Kincaid
May 29th, 2009 | LINK
Donna,
I think your speculation is not based on history.
While it is very likely that McCain would have ignored furthering gay rights, nothing in his history shows any inclination to roll back rights that we already have.
And to assume that McCain would have rolled back rights further than the outgoing Bush adminstation is illogical.
Ironically, the situation may be precisely the opposite. At present we have a slight decrease in rights from the outgoing Bush administration (HIV immigration and travel ban) from the Obama administration. Bush had lifted the HIV ban, but Obama reversed his decision as part of a reversal of all late-term Bush decisions.
If we consider that McCain was unlikely to reverse Bush’s policies as a whole, an argument could be made that at least for a very short period we would have been better off with McCain.
Let’s hope and pray (and lobby and pressure) that this short period ends very quickly.
Priya Lynn
May 29th, 2009 | LINK
Timothy said “Ironically, the situation may be precisely the opposite. At present we have a slight decrease in rights from the outgoing Bush administration (HIV immigration and travel ban) from the Obama administration. Bush had lifted the HIV ban, but Obama reversed his decision as part of a reversal of all late-term Bush decisions.
If we consider that McCain was unlikely to reverse Bush’s policies as a whole, an argument could be made that at least for a very short period we would have been better off with McCain.”.
Bush had also passed a right of conscience for medical workers that would have allowed them to refuse service to people (like gays) on the basis of their religion. Obama also reversed that, which was a good thing. I don’t buy that “for a very short period we would have been better off with McCain.”.
Timothy Kincaid
May 29th, 2009 | LINK
Priya,
I believe the “right on conscience” ruling only applied to federal funding for medical facilities that don’t allow employees to refuse to perform abortions. It possibly might have been so loosely worded as to also include contraception and artificial insemination. This is a right, incidentally, that congress protects. Bush’s ruling had only to do with implemenation and reporting.
It does not appear that this could or would have any influence on refusing service to gay people. It’s probably a good thing this ruling was reversed (it was poorly written) but it does not impact gay people disproportionately.
As for what you buy or don’t buy, that’s of little concern. But I do know that those non-native-born who have HIV are greatly concerned about the change from the Bush policy.
I hope the President rectifies the situation soon.
Priya Lynn
May 29th, 2009 | LINK
Timothy, your feeling that this did not “appear” to have any influence on refusing service to gay people is also of little concern. As we’ve seen in the past if religious people can interpret it this way, they will.
werdna
May 30th, 2009 | LINK
“Bush had lifted the HIV ban”
Not quite. He signed the PEPFAR bill which allowed DHHS to lift the ban but never signed an executive order which would’ve actually lifted the ban. Not to excuse Obama for his lack of action on this point, but it appears you’re giving Bush credit for something he never did.
werdna
May 30th, 2009 | LINK
Veering back on topic, is there any chance of an update for this post to reflect the fact that Obama wasn’t necessarily referring to anti-Prop 8 protesters at all? Here’s an article from the Armenian Daily News which supports the notion that it was Armenian protesters who were chanting ““Obama, keep your promise.” The article also makes clear that there were several different groups gathered that night:
The insistence that LGBTs were the only protesters and that Obama was slighting the LGBT community in particular seems embarrassingly solipsistic.
Ephilei
June 1st, 2009 | LINK
I’m with Obama. What promise are you referring to? The one about marriage equality which never existed?
@Timothy Unless Palin took McCain’s presidency. When her pastor believes the antichrist will be gay, I shudder to think of her presidency.
Timothy Kincaid
June 1st, 2009 | LINK
Ephilei,
There are many reasons to shudder at the thought of a Sarah Palin presidency. But that isn’t one of them.
Rev. Ron Hamman may be from Wasilla but he isn’t her pastor.
Alas, a blog » Blog Archive » Obama DOJ to same-sex couples: Go fuck yourselves
June 13th, 2009 | LINK
[...] votes and money, Obama made a lot of promises to LBGTQ voters, but he hasn’t fufilled a single one of those promises. And now his DOJ is actively working against equality with the same enthusiasm and bad faith [...]
Leave A Comment