Are Marriages Now Legal in D.C.?

Timothy Kincaid

June 4th, 2009

It has now been 30 days since the Council of Washington, D.C. voted 12 – 1 to recognize same-sex marriages that were legally performed elsewhere. Congress’ window to veto the Council’s decision seems to have run out.

Does this then mean that D.C. residents can now take a five hour drive up I-95 and return to live in legally wedded bliss?

ANSWER: From our informed readers below: “Nope”

It appears to be legislative days, not calendar days. So D.C. residents still have time to rent the hall and plan the local reception for their out-of-state wedding.

CPT_Doom

June 4th, 2009

Um, no – the 30-day review is actually 30 legislative days – which means days on which Congress convenes. That means all weekends and holidays like Memorial Day don’t count.

As I understand it, the 30-day review period will end around July 4, although there is a coalition of haters trying to get a referendum on our local elections this fall. IIRC, they only have until the end of Congress’ legislative review period to gather signatures, and the DC office responsible for such things has not ruled on whether such a referendum is legal – the referendum process cannot include items that would violate the Human Rights Law, which includes LGBT individuals.

Aaron

June 4th, 2009

I asked the Mayor’s office this question, and they responded that the expected close of the review period will be July 6. A WaPo reporter also confirmed that the 6th is the day the DC Council expects the period to close. There is supposed to be a hearing on the referendum to determine if they can go forward with collecting signatures on June 10th, although the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics hasn’t published the proposal or given notice of the hearing date in the D.C. Register yet. The new issue comes out Friday, so we should have more informaiton then. It’s important to challenge the referendum and hold it up as long as possible, including in court. The less time they have to collect signatures the better.

mgh

June 4th, 2009

what they said. it’s legislative days.;

Steve

June 4th, 2009

DC transmitted the legislation to Congress on May 11 – Congress was off Memorial Day Week and will be off the week before July 4 —
so July 6 is the expected date. You can track progress for the DC marriage act here:

http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/lims/legislation.aspx?LegNo=B18-0010&Description=DISCLOSURE-TO-THE-UNITED-STATES-DISTRICT-COURT–AMENDMENT-ACT-OF-2009.&ID=21817

Kris

June 5th, 2009

Here’s a question — before Loving vs. Virginia, interracial marriage was illegal in many states. But those states where it was illegal to perform an interracial marriage did recognize interracial marriages performed elsewhere. (I know this because my parents were married in 1957 in DC, but lived in Virginia).

Is the marriage movement also pushing respect for marriages from other states? As far as I know, DC is the sole jurisdiction to legislate on this. It’s not as important as marriage but it is important.

Chris Edelson

June 9th, 2009

NY already recognizes marriages by same-sex couples legally entered into in other jurisdictions. MD is considering whether this can be done (attorney general is reviewing).

werdna

June 9th, 2009

Kris-Your parents were lucky then. If one of your parents was white and the other wasn’t their DC marriage would’ve been recognized in Virginia only as evidence of their having violated Virginia law. The Lovings were also married in DC and then moved back to Virginia where they were arrested. After pleading guilty they moved back to DC (their one-year sentence was suspended on the condition that they not return to Virginia together for 25 years).

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Charlotte Pulls "Compromise" With State Over HB2

Premier of Australia's Victoria State Apologizes for Historic Homosexuality Convictions

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today in History, 1610: Virginia Colony Enacts North America's First Sodomy Statute

Today In History, 1983: Pat Buchanan Says AIDS Is Nature's "Awful Retribution"

Today In History, 1988: Britain Enacts Section 28

Padres Finally Respond to Gay Men's Chorus Debacle

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.