The New Miss California Also Does Not Support Same-Sex Marriage

Timothy Kincaid

June 12th, 2009

The Miss California Pageant has replaced one young Christian girl… with another, Teri Farrell.

According to the Kansas City Star,

She’s a Christian. Farrell recently finished recording her first demo CD and performed during a Christian cruise to the Bahamas last summer. Last fall she worked with Christian recording artists, Sonic Flood, on a new CD project.

And the Mercury News is telling us that she doesn’t support marriage equality

In a television interview Thursday, [Tami] Farrell said she believed marriage should be between a man and a woman. But she added: “I don’t think I have the right or anybody has the right to tell somebody who they can or can’t love.”

But it seems that Tami, unlike Carrie, doesn’t think her opinion on the matter is the result of some battle between God and Satan or that she’s qualified to weigh in authoritatively.

But what about gay marriage? Farrell feels it is “hilarious that the world is turning to beauty queens for the answers” on gay marriage, but she didn’t have a strong opinion on either side of the debate.

“I don’t think I have the right, or anyone has the right, to tell somebody who they can or cannot love. I think this is a civil rights issue, and I think the right thing to do is to let the voters decide.”

TMZ has video from CNN in which she says that the decision should be state by state and that she isn’t interested in hooking up with anti-gay organizations.

Andrew

June 12th, 2009

Now here’s someone I can work with. She has her own opinion. She’s not strident, she understands the absurdity of the situation, and she’s a “hands-off” kind of person. This is so much more in keeping with most of the conservative Christian folk I encounter – aware, thoughtful, and possessing an opinion, but humble and open-handed. I’m happy to differ with Ms. Farrell, but I’m not at all unhappy that she’s got the name of my state across her sash.

Lindoro Almaviva

June 13th, 2009

OK, I think the difference here is not necessarily Tami’s opinion. If you look at the GMA interview, Keith (is that his name? Will you marry me?)is keeping a very close eye on her.

I think that she was coached and told very clearly that as an employee of Miss Cali, she was going to read from the script and her personal opinions be dammed.

I actually see a girl who is trying to dance a difficult dance here. She knows what happened to Carrie and Keith is not about to have the same thing happen to the organization.

I have a feeling that this time, he coached her strongly and she is being careful to please her boss and not to waste this opportunity.

Sorry, these days, I just do not trust anyone who comes and says the stuff that she says, mainly because I do not see marriage equality as a state-only issue and I certainly believe voters do not have a say on the issue; both are cop-outs. People have no right to vote on anyone’s rights and there is a federal issue to marriage that is still unresolved. So either remove the federal benefits of marriage, or be honest and say that marriage is a federal issue as much as a state issue.

Jason D

June 13th, 2009

Ha! Good!

I mean good in the sense that this undermines Carrie’s “I’m being punished for my views and beliefs!” mantra.

Really, Carrie? They replaced one person who’s not in favor of marriage equality with someone else who’s ALSO not in favor of marriage equality. Gee, I guess you can’t say you’re being persecuted.

Has anyone bothered to check what the views are of Miss USA (who’s been undeservedly lost in the shuffle) she mentions in her bio her “missionary work” — so it would not be too farfetched to suggest that she’s a christian, and an active one at that. Doesn’t mean she’s against marriage equality, but it’s certainly possible.

CLS

June 13th, 2009

Hilariously her answer is self-contradictory. She doesn’t think “anyone has the right to tell somebody who they can or cannot love” but apparently everyone has that right since “the right thing to do is let the voters decide.”

The real question is: When did individual rights become a matter of majority opinion? Is that theory just a advocating a glorified lynch mob. Surely in a lynch mob the majority expresses an opinion which is pretty much accepted by all with the obvious exception of an insignificant minority of one.

GreenEyedLilo

June 13th, 2009

Good points, Jason. It’s actually kind of better this way.

I still want to see an openly lesbian or bisexual beauty queen, though.

Zeke

June 13th, 2009

My question is, why the hell does the Miss USA pageant have more fundamentalist Christian contestants than a Mississippi tent revival and why do gay people (coaches, hair dressers, designers, etc.) continue propping up these anti-gay fundie fests?

Jason D

June 13th, 2009

zeke, I’m about to go out on a limb here, but considering the somewhat overt sexism of the fundamentalist set — one of the highly encouraged bits of “women’s work” is the auspicious job of “being pretty”…..so as to attract a good husband. Thus “Beauty Queen” is kind of the omega of the few paths a woman has in that world.

You could almost hear the subtext during the dustup last month, the fundies wanting to say “but…how can you be mad at her…she’s pretty!”

Timothy Kincaid

June 16th, 2009

Jason,

I think your speculation about gender rolls is not without some merit.

I’d also suggest that some will see “beauty” as validation of God’s approval. An innocent face, an “inner beauty shining through” as opposed to sin making its mark, etc.

seo st albans

August 1st, 2013

We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.

Your website provided us with valuable information to work
on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful
to you.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.