The Daily Agenda for Tuesday, May 21
Connecticut Scouts simply announce that they are accepting gay scout leaders
Church of Scotland allows ministers in relationship
Last Minute Bid to Sink Marriage Bill Fails in British Commons
Will Illinois Be #13?
The Daily Agenda for Monday, May 20
Gay Man Shot To Death In NYC Hate Crime
The Daily Agenda for Sunday, May 19
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Bruce Garrett
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
How…fierce.
lurker
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
I’m a federal employee, and am pretty darn happy about this personnaly . . . especially for friends of mine with partners who need health benefits.
Politically it’s kind of disappointing though. Why didn’t he take on DADT first, which has such political support and which he promised during the campaign?
lurker
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
oh. whoops. looks like NO health benes. well, that was short-lived happiness.
Timothy Kincaid
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
Ummm…. yeah, that wouldn’t be a very compelling campaign. Not that I’m not grateful, I am, but well… let’s just say I’m not dancing around my table.
I find it interesting that there wasn’t a single positive comment on the Advocate’s site.
Jim Burroway
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
When I first posted this, the Advocate story only had two paragraphs, the first and the last one. This part wasn’t part of the article yet:
Really? Relocation expenses? You’ve got to be kidding me. Health and retirement benefits are the most important part of any benefits plan. This one is practically useless — and a cruel joke at that, given the events of the past few days. If this is supposed to be a sop that the Obama administration is throwing to LGBT employees, it’s a pretty limp one.
I’ve now updated the title of this post to put “Domestic Partner Benefits” in scare quotes where they belong.
Patrick
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
Smells to me like a bone to keep us at bay.
lurker
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
Now that I think about it . . . some friends of mine (CA married lesbians) relocated to AZ last year and got our agency to provide moving expenses for the both of them (really it was only a few hundred bucks of difference, but I think they were pleased to be “included”). Maybe it’s an agency-by-agency call, but it seems that O is going to make a big deal about this, when really it is next to nothing.
hmgph. wish I had kept that campaign donation and taken my sweetie out to a nice dinner instead. I wouldn’t feel like suuuuuch a sucker.
steve
June 16th, 2009 | LINK
WTF…..this is so so very small….crumbs….
Bruno
June 17th, 2009 | LINK
I think this move is a response to 2 coinciding events: the furor over the DOJ briefing that has the fundraiser on the verge of cancellation, coupled with the tabling of the vote on the hate crimes bill to August. The latter is very important, because it would have served as a minor distraction from the DOJ-DOMA mess. Now, Obama had to fall back on this to cover up BOTH the briefing fiasco and the hate crimes vote delay. And it won’t work. Not a bit.
Alan
June 17th, 2009 | LINK
I wonder…why?
Obama’s doing healthcare reform and other big, complicated tasks. Why can’t he manage something relatively simple and less controversial like DADT?
Are they really afraid that it will provoke controversy that will distract from the other tasks?
Are they more interested in support from across the aisle than support from traditionally Dem groups like gays?
Or does Obama have some personal objections to gays? African Americans tend to be less approving than Americans in general.
I don’t know.
Johnson
June 17th, 2009 | LINK
Did any of you notice these “benefits” expire at the end of BO’s term as President? Wake up people, we have been taken for granted and lied to!
Leave A Comment