June 19th, 2009
If we believe our politicians, health care is broken in America and the Federal Government is the only one who can fix it. Our President is so concerned about implementing healthcare reform that he can\’t spare a moment to work on equality for gays and lesbians.
However, a more cynical observation may be that for gay and lesbian Americans, the Federal Government is the problem rather than the solution to our immediate health care concerns. And before we focus on the controversial and highly combative effort to overhaul the country\’s methods of providing health care, let\’s at least make sure the rules are applied fairly and equally.
Here are four things that the administration could work with Congress to make health care more affordable for gay people… should they want to.
Pass the Domestic Partners Benefits and Obligations Act.
This tax based solely on sexual orientation is probably unconstitutional, is definitely immoral, and is entire unjustifiable.
The President can try to sell us on his medical overhaul based on its merits, benefits and costs. But I\’ll not be impressed in the slightest if it does not correct the inequities that the government has set up to unfairly deny health care rights to gay Americans and to unfairly tax them on the ones they do get.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Curt Engeland
June 19th, 2009
Also excluded is the Flexible Spending account. My husband is being added to my benefits (he’s retiring) and my next benefits elections would be to increase the amount withheld to pay for incidental healthcare. Since this is a federal law, I won’t be able to use his expenses and be reimbursed from my account.
Scott
June 19th, 2009
These rules all seem to follow from DOMA. Even if the original policies pre-date DOMA, the current interpretations to exclude same-sex couple equality are in line with this, most odious, part of the Clinton legacy.
We need to shift some anger to congress where the legislation to repeal DOMA must occur. How long have the democrats been in the majority?
Bruno
June 19th, 2009
As a side note, the president seems to have very little control over Congress (especially the Senate) when it comes to health care, among other things. This is a pattern we might say is indicative of “1993 syndrome,” where Obama and his administration actually think that Republicans have much say in anything at all. The hapless Democrats don’t even know what to do with their mandate, and this country will stagnate in its own dirty pools until if and when they figure it all out.
ravenbiker
June 22nd, 2009
Amen for this blog!
Leave A Comment