Ft. Worth Police Used “Restraint”

Timothy Kincaid

June 30th, 2009

WFAA.com reports:

Monday, police chief Jeff Halstead said the officers’ actions are being investigated. However, he also said that officers that entered the bar during the scheduled inspection were touched inappropriately.

“You’re touched and advanced in certain ways by people inside the bar, that’s offensive,” he said. “I’m happy with the restraint used when they were contacted like that.”

Uh-huh. Because bleeding on the brain is the right, just, and appropriate consequence to being “advanced in certain ways.” We should just be thankful that his goons showed restraint and didn’t beat anyone to death for their “advances”.

The more I hear from Mr. Halstead, the more he demonstrates his discomfort with and utter contempt for those members of his community that are gay. In a city that valued its residents this man would be disciplined for “advancing” the gay panic defense, the officers would be pulled off duty until the investigation was complete, and a liason would be assigned to determine the extent of police brutality experienced by gay residents. And that would be showing restaint.

jim

June 30th, 2009

“Scheduled Inspection”? Do they have those at Applebees too?

jim

June 30th, 2009

Let’s just all take a deep breath. Mr. Halstead has a great resume. I think he needs to take a deep breath too. I’m taking my deep breaths. I don’t know the details; I wasn’t there.

I’ve said on this board that our law enforcement people are important and needed, and should be recognized for all the good work they do for our communities.

A quote I heard that I like, “If you gotta eat crow, eat it fresh.”

I’ve made mistakes. Everyone has. The only people who don’t make mistake are the people who don’t do anything.

It’s better to be open about what has happened instead of trying to hide.

lindoro almaviva

June 30th, 2009

Where is the ACLU on this? does anyone have any knowledge of what is the ACLU, the Human Rights campaign, and the local chapter on Equality doing? Or are they doing exactly what they did with Obama? “Don’t worry, is just a couple of heads and they are no famous people. Just pass our pet projects and we’ll let this one slide.”

Christopher Waldrop

July 1st, 2009

Jim, I’ve been taking several deep breaths, and it seems like Mr. Halstead is ignoring the facts that have been presented to him.

I’ve also said on this board that I’ve known some pretty nice cops–people who were nice to be around and who, because of their intelligence and kindness, made me feel a little more secure. There are a lot of times that I want to give the police the benefit of the doubt.

Given the information that’s come out about this situation, though, this is not one of them.

Andrew

July 1st, 2009

Sounds to me like Halstead is going to have to back up and state that he will make statements after a formal, independent investigation is conducted. Otherwise, he’s just parroting the statements of the officers – because that’s the only input he’s getting. The problem is that Halstead is also answerable to the public, and as such, he has to balance those interests.

My question is: who scheduled and planned this raid? are they being investigated? who provided leadership here and basically authorized this behavior?

John

July 1st, 2009

(1) Putting a man in the hospital with a brain injury is NOT “showing restraint”;
(2) Being hit on by someone is NOT a reason to brutalize that person;
(3) Police officers who are trained to take down armed and aggressive criminals should be able to handle a come-on without flipping out;
(4) They officers knew that they were entering a GAY BAR and they were “offended” by attention from the patrons?
(5) The whole thing is a total crock–NO ONE would ever see a bunch of pumped up, burly, dead-serious on-duty policemen storm into an establishment and then casually hit on one of them. You’d just get out of their way. It’s completely asinine. It’s almost certain that no one actually touched them, and if anyone did, it would be because they failed to identify themselves properly as on-duty officers (in which case we’re back to “hey, you’re a guy in a gay bar who appears to be just another patron–what did you expect?”

This is a purely fictional “excuse” made up by a bunch of homophobes trying to justify their gay bashing after the fact. Only a self-righteous homophobe would think to suggest that gay men just can’t keep their hands off other men in any context–or that violence is ever an appropriate response to being hit on by another man.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Federal Judge Blocks UNC From Enforcing North Carolina's "Bathroom Bill"

Georgia Pastor Who Praised Orlando Shooting Arrested for Child Molestation

Maine's Governor Is the Epitome Of What's Wrong In The Republican Party

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: Protesters March, then Riot in Greenwich Village over Police Harassment

Born On This Day, 1844: Edward Carpenter

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1951: California Gay Bars Given Very Brief Reprieve

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.