Box Turtle Bulletin

Box Turtle BulletinNews, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
“Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife…”
This article can be found at:
Latest Posts

Joint Chiefs Chair: Repealing DADT Would Impact “Our People And Their Families”

Jim Burroway

July 5th, 2009

Now this is getting ridiculous. First, we had former Secretary of State Colin Powell say that repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” would result in “lots of complicated issues” without mentioning what those complicated issues might be. Now we have Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, tell CNN that repealing the ban on gays serving in the military would somehow affect their families as well:

“I haven’t done any kind of extensive review. And what I feel most obligated about is to make sure I tell the president, you know, my — give the president my best advice, should this law change, on the impact on our people and their families at these very challenging times,” he said.

What, are we showering with their families now? I had no idea I was such a threat whenever I shower at the gym. My powers truly know no bounds.

Comments

POST COMMENT | COMMENT RSS 2.0 | TRACKBACK URL

David C.
July 5th, 2009 | LINK

Here are some things to keep in mind:

If gay service personnel are placed on the same legal (in the sense of UCMJ) footing as heterosexual personnel, then the “mates” of gay service personnel would be competing for benefits from the same (presumably limited) pool.

As the murder of Seaman August Provost shows, when DADT is repealed, new procedures and regulations must fill the gap to protect what would then be a far more visible gay service member population. Perhaps all the machinery used to enforce DADT could be retooled to improve the behavior of all military personnel.

I still think DADT should be repealed, and I think the President needs to show some leadership by establishing a timeline along which that will happen.

TomChicago
July 6th, 2009 | LINK

We have to wonder why he has NOT given the matter any “extensive review”. Everyone else seems to have had plenty of time. Mullen and Powell both are exhibiting the same kind of bureaucratic cold feet, it seems to me, and nothing more.

GreenEyedLilo
July 6th, 2009 | LINK

So *that* is why one of the women I swim with is getting a divorce–she has to shower off the chlorine alongside the likes of me in the locker room! I had no idea I had such power, either.

So now I have to apologize to her and her family, as well as the whole country for the crappy economy because I got married (per Sally Kern).

Burr
July 6th, 2009 | LINK

It would affect families whose father gets arrested/discharged for being a murderous bigot.

Oh how I feel for them.

Glenn I
July 7th, 2009 | LINK

One of the things DADT prohibits is the formation of families by gay servicemembers. Should DADT end gay servicemembers would no longer be required to sacrifice their personal lives to be military. Imagine that.

If the bitterly censorious DOMA remained the military would continue to resist any acknowledgment of these newly “out” families. Despite the additional burdens placed on them families would form, and kids would grow up in households headed by same sex couples. And Mommy would be a soldier. Or Daddy.

DADT is the government’s stoutest chain around the closet. And losing it terrifies them.

Why? Those of us who’ve long since left our closets to our clothes don’t know.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.