NOM Commits Sodomy
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, February 11
The Daily Agenda for Friday, February 10
Again anti-gays blindly and gleefully shoot themselves in the foot
Rep. Walsh leads with her heart
Advocate, WaPo, AP Get it Wrong On Anti-Homosexuality Bill
Uganda Executive, Parliament Tussle Over Anti-Homosexuality BIll
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, February 9
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 450 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
Posts 
Posts via daily email:
Christopher Waldrop
July 27th, 2009 | LINK
It’s unfortunate that those who are opposed to equality feel that lying is justified—that it’s the lesser of two evils. Also, I don’t believe anyone promoting equality would lie about this, especially knowing they could be caught. I honestly believe those who are trying to put an end to bigotry and intolerance are honest primarily because it’s the right thing to do, but also, to a lesser degree, because being caught lying would hurt the cause. I’m not suggesting those of us who are in favor of equality would or should lie if we could get away with it, but unfortunately it seems to be the way of things that bigots aren’t worried about being called liars. They don’t really object to being called liars, and pointing out their dishonesty doesn’t seem to hurt their efforts at all.
I know it’s too much to hope that both sides will be equally honest. I do find some small comfort in the fact that the signature-gatherers are aware of just how tenuous their position is that they’re unwilling to be honest.
Burr
July 27th, 2009 | LINK
Why is there no legal measure against this sort of thing? IMO if you can prove one instance of this outright lying, the whole petition should be thrown out. It’s no different than election fraud.
If you can’t play fair you don’t deserve to play at all.
Richard W. Fitch
July 27th, 2009 | LINK
“And there are 138,000 people who will not(?now?) have recorded for posterity and for public scrutiny on a searchable website their action to deny rights to their neighbors.”
Martha
July 27th, 2009 | LINK
And there are 138,000 people who will not have recorded for posterity and for public scrutiny on a searchable website their action to deny rights to their neighbors. Sadly, some of them were gay supporters who were deceived and lied to – but they too will be tarred as unkind, selfish, spiteful neighbors.
Well, given that we actually know that some people were mislead into signing – I would say that was their own fault, but honesty compels me to admit I’ve signed petitions assuming that it was what the canvasser said it was – maybe people could just hold off on assuming that all the signatures are those of bigoted homophobes? Certainly if it turns out there weren’t enough valid signatures anyway, it could be treated as ‘no harm, no foul.’
Just a thought.
Trevor
July 27th, 2009 | LINK
Why do you people kid yourselves? ALL the signatures will be validated, placed on the ballot, and oh guess what? All the het f**ktards will vote against you. You lose.
David C.
July 27th, 2009 | LINK
In the unlikely event that there are enough valid signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot, and if in fact the signers names are made widely available by an activist group, those individuals that believe they might have been tricked into signing should participate in a political advertisement exposing the pro-R-71 campaigns’ tactics and thus shame the bigots in front of the entire state.
Irrespective of whether this measure makes it to the ballot, all of these facts should be kept along with evidence of what happened with respect to the 71 signature drive. Anti-gay activists will not give up, and it will be necessary to fight them again., so having some political ammunition will be helpful in the future.
Paid signature gatherers lie and distort facts to get signatures because they have a cash incentive to do so. Exposing this is important when out-of-state anti-gay activists try to influence state social policy in a manner that is not helpful to the residents of that state.
Timothy Kincaid
July 27th, 2009 | LINK
Thanks, Richard. Now that’s a typo that fully changed the meaning.
Brian Murphy
July 28th, 2009 | LINK
Once the Referendum 71 signatures are made accessible online by WhoSigned.org and KnowThyNeighbor.org we’ll have a way for voters who were misled or signed in error to provide an affidavit that we’ll also put online linked to the name on the site.
The public will be able to check and correct the public record and people who signed in error will be able to share their stories.
Brian Murphy
WhoSigned.org
Mark F.
July 28th, 2009 | LINK
Well, if this does get on the ballot and is defeated , it would be the first time gay marriage won at the ballot box. That would be significant.
We do eventually need a ballot box win.
Timothy Kincaid
July 28th, 2009 | LINK
Mark,
This isn’t marriage. It’s domestic partnerships.
Leave A Comment