Census to Release Marriage Information

Timothy Kincaid

August 3rd, 2009

We reported that the President was looking into the possibility of counting same-sex marriages in the 2010 census. Now it’s official: (WaPo)

The Census Bureau will for the first time publicly release the number of gay marriages reported in a decennial census, as it plans to release raw data about same-sex relationships in the 2010 headcount, according to new guidelines released today.

The decision reverses a Bush-era policy that prohibited the release of the data. In a legal opinion published last week, Commerce Department lawyers concluded that the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act does not prohibit the Census Bureau from publicly releasing the data, contrary to the conclusions reached by Bush administration lawyers.

It appears, however, that the data will be “released” but not “counted” so as to be compliant with Congress’ Defense of Marriage Act. Evidently there is no assumption that DOMA will have been reversed any time before 2010 or 2011.

Continuing current policy, the new guidelines state that software used by Census enumerators will recode answers given by same sex-partners who mark their relationship status as “husband or wife,” to “unmarried partner.” But then, in late 2011, Census officials will for the first time release the raw state-by-state data on same-sex couples that marked their relationship status as “husband or wife.”

Statisticians (and politicians) need not wait until 2011 for census information about same-sex couples.

The Census will first report same-sex marriage data later this year when it releases the 2008 American Community Survey. The results of the annual housing and population survey will include unedited responses regarding relationship status.

This is all good news. And a great step. And will inject valuable information into the national discourse. And for this moment we celebrate.

But if we step back a moment to look at the big picture, we see same-sex couples who have legally married in the eyes of their state, their church, their families, and their communities who truthfully report this to their government, only to have that government change their answers. And considering that the purpose of a census is to provide accurate information so as to allow for informed decision making, it is hard to fathom the logic of beurocrats and politicians deliberately deceiving themselves just so that they may refuse to acknowledge what their constituents are trying to tell them.

Some day we will all look back and marvel at the blatant discrimination with which our nation has abused its gay and lesbian citizens.

Thomas Kraemer

August 3rd, 2009

The Census has always made “raw data” available to researchers, even back in the days of magnetic data tape reels. The problem with the Census Bureau’s “raw data” is there are VERY FEW people with access to the highly sophisticated computer algorithms required to accurately extract even simple information, such as the number of same-sex married couples by state. Hopefully, some gay census experts will do this work pro bono.

Burr

August 3rd, 2009

I know there’s been studies that have attempted to estimate same sex couples based on the census before, so it’s well-trodden territory.

I’m having trouble understanding how DOMA applies to the census at all and why they have to do this idiotic tap dance. It’s just data, not policy.

Christopher Waldrop

August 4th, 2009

Like Burr I wonder why DOMA applies to the census, and as I read this I was scratching my head and wondering what the Bush administration’s justification was for prohibiting the release of the information. Oh, I know Bush didn’t think the public needed to know anything, but was there really a concern that releasing information about the number of same-sex couples in the US posed a threat?

JimInMa

August 4th, 2009

CW –
Of course it’s a threat – to those who want to keep believing that gay marriage either doesn’t exist or cannot happen.
Their entire way of life will be overturned if they find out that the statistics for gay marriage and divorce are about the same as for hetero marriage and divorce. They would have to start thinking of us as actual people rather than a few shouting political terrorist perverts.

Christopher Waldrop

August 5th, 2009

JimInMa-
Thanks for clarifying. It’s so obvious I feel stupid for not realizing that suppressing the data would allow people who feel threatened by same-sex marriage to pretend it doesn’t exist.
And maybe I’m being overly naive and optimistic, but there is a possibility that same-sex divorce rates are lower than they are for heterosexual couples. I can understand why some might consider that a threat.

Jason D

August 5th, 2009

“And maybe I’m being overly naive and optimistic, but there is a possibility that same-sex divorce rates are lower than they are for heterosexual couples. I can understand why some might consider that a threat.”

My guess is that the divorce rate will be lower for LGBT couples…at first. Along with younger couples who decided to tie the knot recently, there are also a number of couples who’ve been defacto “married” for 10, 20, 30, 40+ years already — those couples are less likely to get legally married today and legally divorced tomorrow. But after we run out of older couples who have been waiting decades to get married, I think it will equalize.

Ephilei

August 7th, 2009

Is this only counting marriages that are legally recognized? If I have a same-sex marriage in Illinois recognized by friends and family but not Illinois, do I still get ignored?

chris colon

August 7th, 2009

I don’t understand why DOMA would prevent gay marriages from being counted. Illegal aliens are encouraged to participate in the census so that they can be counted. It is important to count everyone, and every category as well. Obviously, even though they are encouraged to participate, they probably don’t in great numbers. However, the point is that they are counted, and the fact that it is illegal for them to be in the country does not prevent the government from counting them. Makes no sense to me at all! I WANT ALL LEGAL GAY MARRIAGES COUNTED IN THE NEXT CENSUS AND I WILL ENCOURAGE/DEMAND THIS FROM MY REPRESENTATIVES IN D.C.. This is the kind of information that will help us to measure our efforts in the work of legalizing gay marriage, and not having the information makes it impossible to make any conclusions about legally married gay couples’ demographics and they all know that! Write to your representation in D.C. to force the counters to include legally married gay couples.

Timothy Kincaid

August 7th, 2009

Ephilei,

I’m not sure. My understanding is that they will release the number of those who tick the “married” box but are of the same sex.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1808: Australian Court Convicts Two Of "Most Disgusting and Abominable" Crime

Today In History, 1865: Dr. Barry's Death Reveals a Lifelong Secret

Today In History, 1985: Rock Hudson's AIDS Diagnosis Confirmed

Emphasis Mine

Born On This Day, 1844: Thomas Eakins

Born On This Day, 1879: J. Warren Kerrigan

Born On This Day, 1974: Gareth Thomas

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.