Washington’s New Reporting

Timothy Kincaid

August 11th, 2009

The Washington Secretary of State has a new reporting method by which they will wait until supervisors have reviewed and corrected the rejections made by checkers of signatures before they post the results. Based on the finalized review so far, 33,214 have been checked and 3,450 rejected for a fail rate of 10.39%.

Unless the remaining three quarters of signatures are very different from the first quarter, this referendum will qualify for the ballot. And it may set a new record for cleanest petition ever submitted in the state.

At present there is no way to determine if the signatures are being reviewed in any particular order. If they are in collection order, then there is a possibility that they will be less clean as time goes on.

Penguinsaur

August 11th, 2009

So… what did we ever do to the people of Washington to get their ire? Their has to be something. I’ve never seen someone actually sign a petition, much less one for something that will never affect them in any way.

Mark F.

August 11th, 2009

OK, folks. 2 battles to win at the ballot box next year. Can we do it?

Timothy Kincaid

August 11th, 2009

Mark,

Washington’s battle is this November

Dan

August 11th, 2009

Tim:

The latest stats are out. The error rate continues to drop. It is now at only 10.42%, two percentage points below the allowable error rate. If this continues, R71 will qualify for the ballot. And we will have both this and Maine to contend with in approximately 2 1/2 months.

It is glaringly obvious why the error rate has dropped from over 13% on Thursday to just 10.42% today. The Secretary of State is double checking initially rejected signatures only and the double check is saving hundreds from the reject pile. But he is not doing the same double check on the initially accepted signatures. So, not surprisingly, the shift is all one way. A skewed process is achieving a skewed result.

Even more amazing is that the Secretary of State’s spokesperson has admitted that this is a feature, not a bug. Apparently, they think that it is acceptable to allow for selective inaccuracies in the review process, so long as such inaccuracy assists the proposed referendum in qualifying.

This is illegal, unfair, and troubling.

Cole

August 11th, 2009

Election officials are rigging the election.

On August 6, 2009 after five days of counting the rejected signature rate was over 14% well over the 12.4% needed to pass. The next day all of a sudden master fixers I mean “checkers” changed the numbers and the rejected signature rate moved a massive 19%. Here we are again today looking at the SAME signatures and the numbers moving another massive 10%. Election officials have looked at the SAME signatures four times and have come up with four different numbers all of thems lower than the last.

Elise

August 11th, 2009

Well damn. You know, I’ve followed these anti-gay referendums in other states, but it feels different now that it’s finally hit my own backyard. (Yeah, there was the ’96 gay marriage ban, but I was in middle school at the time. In fact, I remember my teacher at my Christian school of the time instructing me to write “thank you” letters to conservative politicians thanking them for protecting marriage, and I totally did it. Wow. Different lifetime.)

Anyway, I want to keep my hopes up, but I’m starting to prepare for the likelihood that this is going to make it onto the ballot in my own wonderful, laid-back, crunchy granola state. Et tu, Washington? I guess there’s nothing to do but role up my sleeves and start defending my not-quite-marriage rights.

AJD

August 11th, 2009

Should we be surprised? I’ve never doubted that there’s a lot more people out there who hate us than we think; they just don’t admit it publicly.

I hate to be Debbie Downer, but I have this nagging feeling that Ref. 71 will both make the ballot for November and win, along with the one in Maine. After Prop. 8, I’ve learned not to be optimistic about the near-future prospects of gay rights in America. Like African-Americans, Native Americans, women and others, gays have to suffer for rights that others are born with.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.