The Daily Agenda for Wednesday, June 19
Another Exodus Conference Is Upon Us. Let's Review.
For Our Opponents: Talking to Your Kids About Same-Sex Marriage
The Daily Agenda for Tuesday, June 18
The Daily Agenda for Monday, June 17
The Daily Agenda for Sunday, June 16
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, June 15
The Daily Agenda for Friday, June 14
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Priya Lynn
September 4th, 2009 | LINK
I’m not so sure about that. I read that blacks only make up a small part of the population in the U.S., something like 15%. If that’s the case their impact on equal rights is relatively small.
gar
September 4th, 2009 | LINK
I love Julian Bond. He is one of my long time heroes.
Richard W. Fitch
September 4th, 2009 | LINK
“I read that blacks only make up a small part of the population in the U.S., something like 15%. If that’s the case their impact on equal rights is relatively small.”
If it is true that less than 10% of the US population is LGBT then how can we ever have any impact on the struggle for equality?
The part I think you are missing is that most African-American churches are conservative, evangelical in doctrine. They echo many of the sentiments in the white homophobic fundamentalist sects. Many A-A groups contend that the fight for gay rights is not the same as the Civil Rights movement exemplified by MLK and others of the 60′s. There is also the issue of ‘machismo’ which prevents many males of that community from coming out. In the long-run it’s not initial %% that count so much as passion, commitment and factual presentation of issues that matters. When LGBT forces fight against each other, it’s an uphill battle. Negotiation and compromise will aid in unification and then the ability to convince mainstream America that we have a just and moral cause.
Priya Lynn
September 4th, 2009 | LINK
Richard, LGBTs can’t have any impact on the struggle for equality by themselves, and if the numbers I quoted are correct, neither can blacks. This will be decided almost entirely by straight white people.
I’m not saying that we shouldn’t attempt to change attitudes in the black community, I just don’t think they are the insurmountable wall that Julian Bond is suggesting. Take California for example, what is it, a 2% loss there for marriage equality? The battle will be won there even if no black person changes their mind there.
Chris McCoy
September 4th, 2009 | LINK
Richard W. Fitch said:
I believe that this stance, taken by many African-Americans and other conservative groups, is based on the belief that homosexuality is a choice, whereas being black isn’t.
Until we can prove that homosexuality is or is not a choice, I don’t think we’ll make any significant head-way in that department.
Our smartest option until then is to counter the belief that “choosing” to be gay is somehow a “bad choice.”
Burr
September 4th, 2009 | LINK
Nonsense. Even if being gay is a choice, it’s still about the right to make that choice.
We still have passionate defenses against religious discrimination, even though that is most certainly a choice.
There’s no need to convince people of that uniformly in order for them to understand it’s just plain wrong to discriminate against people for doing something that harms no one.
Priya Lynn
September 4th, 2009 | LINK
Well said Burr.
----
September 5th, 2009 | LINK
I am wondering: if we somehow make blacks dissociate themselves from abrahamic religions (by pointing out how many verses of the Bible and Quran are racist and pro-slavery), do you think they would change their minds regarding LGBT issues?
Penguinsaur
September 5th, 2009 | LINK
Pointing out the verses in the bible that were proudly used to deny blacks and women rights? You’ve actually met a christian who will admit those exist? All I ever get is some crap about how everyone for the last 2000 years or so ‘misinterpreted’ and the current interpretation of the bible *which conveniently allows everything americans approve of and bans whatever they hate* they’ve been using for the past 30-40 years is perfect. Just like in 50 years they’ll be denying any ‘true christian’ opposed gays and that it was just a ‘vocal minority’ twisting scripture.
David
September 7th, 2009 | LINK
Perhaps we should point out that we could withhold our support from African American (and other ‘of color’) candidates until GLBTQ people have the same level of civil equality that people of color have now. No more advances for racial equality, until we catch up.
Support is a two-way street.
Trey
September 8th, 2009 | LINK
@David
And what do you think us GLBTQ people of color candidates would think about this moratorium on racial equality? or did you just forget that there are GLBTQ people of color?
seriously, can we quit speaking as if black and gay are mutually exclusive?
Leave A Comment