Gov. Schwarzenegger Signs 2 Pro-LGBT Bills

Jim Burroway

October 12th, 2009

Everyone’s excited about Harvey Milk finally getting his day, but the bigger news is this: California will now recognize marriages, civil unions and domestic partnerships performed in other states, and treat them as Domestic Partnerships under state law. From The Sacramento Bee:

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed two gay rights bills, one honoring late activist Harvey Milk and another recognizing same-sex marriages performed in other states.

…In a signing message, Schwarzenegger said California will not recognize the couples as married but will “provide the same legal protections that would otherwise be available to couples that enter into civil unions or domestic partnerships out-of-state. In short, this measure honors the will of the People in enacting Proposition 8 while providing important protections to those unions legally entered into in other states.”

May 22 will now be a state day of recognition for Harvey Milk. Gov. Schwarzenegger vetoed a similar bill last year.

Update: Gov Schwarzenegger also vetoed two bills: AB 1185 which would allow “better access to birth certificates for transgender people,” and AB 382, which would provide protections for LGBT prisoners.

Penguinsaur

October 12th, 2009

I can never, ever get excited about Domestic Partnerships/Civil unions. Yeah I get that they’re helpful and better than nothing, but I have to much self-respect to be happy I’m legally considered a second class citizen who doesnt deserve a REAL marriage like good decent straight folk.

GreenEyedLilo

October 12th, 2009

I agree with Penguinsaur, but I think it’s okay as a Bandaid. I hope that better is to follow. When the Christianists understand what happened, they will be *pissed*. So, thanks for the moment, Governator.

*takes deep breath*

Lindoro Almaviva

October 12th, 2009

Add my voice to those who are not wowed by civil (2nd class citizenship) unions, but I understand the significance; so thanks to the Governator and congrats to the people of CA.

Timothy Kincaid

October 12th, 2009

A small reminder:

Since the passage of Proposition 8, this is the best our legislature and governor can do. We cannot – until we reverse Prop 8 – recognize marriage equality in the state. Were it possible to do so, our legislature, our governor, and our Supreme Court would do so.

Here’s a little twist:

Prior to the In Re Marriages decision, California was banned (by Prop 22) from recognizing out-of-state marriages with any status. When the Supreme Court legalized marriage, they threw out that language, which allowed the state to recognize out of state marriages.

When Prop 8 passed, it did not include language banning out-of-state recognition, so therefore this became something the leg/gov could enact.

Timothy Kincaid

October 12th, 2009

Please also note,

SB 54 does not (as might be deduced from the Governor’s comments) recognize all out of state marriages as domestic partnerships.

Rather, it treats them as though they were in-state marriages: i.e. it says that if they occurred before November 5, 2008, they will be marriages and if they are after that date, they will be domestic partnerships.

Regan DuCasse

October 12th, 2009

Well why didn’t that DICKHEA*, sign the legislative bills that made marriage legal back in 2002, 2006?
He got those bills on his desk TWICE, and he vetoed them.
Now he signs this, when he allowed the previous bills to be vulnerable to a public majority vote?

What. An. A$$hole!

Timothy Kincaid

October 12th, 2009

Regan,

Schwarzenegger said that he vetoed the two previous bills because to do so would be unconstitutional and because a judge would put an immediate hold on it until the courts resolved the issue.

Interestingly, he was absolutely correct. The CA Supreme Court, in overturning the ban on gay marriage, specifically noted that the language of Prop 22 could not be overturned by the legislature – exactly as Schwarzenegger said. Same sex marriage would not have come one day sooner whether or not he signed.

Now I wish he had taken the symbolic route of signing the bills. But it would have been pure symbolism and nothing else.

Burr

October 12th, 2009

It says he vetoed those other bills because they were unnecessary.. Are they really? It seems like they’re only unnecessary because that’s policy now under the current administration, but could be easily undone since it’s not in the books permanently.. Even if it were redundant or unnecessary I don’t see why he had to put his foot down there.

----

October 12th, 2009

The hell with the “will of the People”; just like they took away marriage from us, so can they steal the rest of our protections. I can’t wait until the Boies-Olson trial happens.

werdna

October 13th, 2009

Copy editing note: the governor’s name is misspelled in the headline.

Schwarzenegger also signed a third pro-LGBT bill: the LGBT Domestic Violence Programs Expansion bill, which expands access to state funds for LGBT-oriented domestic violence programs.

It should be noted that regarding the Equal ID Act and the LGBT Prisoner Safety Act, the vetoes do not mean Schwarzenegger is opposed to the substance of the bills. Rather, the governor’s position is that the protections provided by each bill are already in place and thus the bills would be redundant.

Finally, thanks to Timothy for your very clear explanation of how the out-of-state marriage bill will work. I was a bit perplexed about that, and the Schwarzenegger’s “signing message” only added to my confusion.

Jim Burroway

October 13th, 2009

Headline fixed. Thanks.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

FBI Reports Massive Surge In Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes in 2015

Baptist General Convention of Texas Warns Churches in Dallas and Austin Over LGBT Inclusion

Trump Selects Alt-Right Nationalist As "Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor"

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.