October 15th, 2009
Good lord, what century is this?
A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.
Neither Bardwell nor the couple immediately returned phone calls from The Associated Press. But Bardwell told the Daily Star of Hammond that he was not a racist. “I do ceremonies for black couples right here in my house,” Bardwell said. “My main concern is for the children.”
…If he does an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.
How’s that for a slippery slope?
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
David
October 15th, 2009
This feels like it must be a prank or political statement of some kind. One that I think will resonant in a positive way.
Lindoro Almaviva
October 15th, 2009
well, he says he only marries black couples, so he is not saying he performs (or has performed)marriages for either white or interracial couples, so in that case i do not see a slippery slope.
Actually, I am glad to see cases like this. I find it fascinating that people will get angry over someone telling a couple they can not marry because of their race and yet be very comfortable with tellime me I can not marry my BF.
Penguinsaur
October 15th, 2009
Lindoro he said he marries blacks to prove he’s not racist, he never said he only marries them.
David, this is Louisiana. The place that makes us Texans look progressive and intelligent in comparison. I have no problem believing this is true.
I don’t think its a coincidence Texans gets more racist the closer you get to the Louisiana border.
I’m loving this story, these people are gonna win this lawsuit without a fight and I get to watch bigots furiously deny that all their arguments against gay marriage can be applied here. Very easily, most of the time all it takes is switching out “same-sex” with “interracial”
Lindoro Almaviva
October 15th, 2009
This is funny. Take a look at the amount of outraged people in the
Yahoo boards
It never ceases to amaze me how people react to situations like this and they actually do not see the hypocrisy of their words
gar
October 15th, 2009
Worst Persons nominee. I’ll watch Keith Olbermann to see if he makes the cut.
Eddie89
October 15th, 2009
From the article:
Has Ms. Schwartzman NOT heard of DOMA?!
And she’s an attorney for the ACLU?!
Burr
October 15th, 2009
She could be implying by omission that DOMA itself is unconstitutional.
Elliot
October 15th, 2009
NOM should make an ad for this poor poor man who is being discriminated against for simply believing that marriage is between one man and one woman of the same ethnicity.
Henry
October 15th, 2009
of course he has a right to be concerned about the children. as everyone knows, there are negative consequences of being a product of interacial parents, like becoming president of the unites states.
Christopher Waldrop
October 16th, 2009
Even though it’s none of the judge’s business, what if this couple didn’t plan to have children? Would he still deny them the right to marry? I find it pretty appalling that he would deny them the right simply because he “says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long”.
Approximately fifty-percent of marriages end in divorce. According to Bardwell’s logic no one should get married then.
Timothy Kincaid
October 16th, 2009
Does this sound familiar? It should:
Just change the words – you know the ones – and you could hear these exact same statements from NOM or any other anti-gay marriage group.
Eddie89
October 16th, 2009
NOM won’t go near this with a ten foot pole, because Maggie Gallagher is in an interracial marriage.
She’s married to a man of Indian descent, Raman Srivastav.
Eddie89
October 16th, 2009
Another irony is that President Obama was in Louisiana and he’s the product of an interracial couple!
So much for “the children will suffer” according to Judge Bardwell.
Leave A Comment