The DNC Boycott: Count Me In

This commentary is the opinion of the author and may not reflect the opinions of other authors at Box Turtle Bulletin.

Jim Burroway

November 10th, 2009

Frustration is boiling over concerning the Democratic Party’s ongoing neglect of LGBT issues. The latest insult to injury? The Democratic National Committee and Organizing for America set emails to Mainers urging them to vote, but didn’t ask them to vote against Question 1. In fact, the email didn’t mention Question 1 at all. The DNC then sent another email urgently asking Mainers to get involved right away in … wait for it … New Jersey! 

When John Averosis at AmericaBlog contacted the DNC about the emails, he got the classic run-around. They first denied targeting Mainers to help with the New Jersey gubernatorial election, and then admitted that they lied about it.

This is just the latest in a long list of grievances and slights that have been building up since last November. That’s why several bloggers led by Avarosis and Joe Sudbay at AmericaBlog are banding together for a “Don’t Ask, Don’t Give” campaign to urge doners to stop donating to the DNC:

It’s really more of a “pause,” than a boycott. Boycotts sounds so final, and angry. Whereas this campaign is temporary, and is only meant to help some friends – President Obama and the Democratic party – who have lost their way. We are hopeful that via this campaign, our friends will keep their promises.

So please sign the Petition and take a Pledge to no longer donate to the DNC, Organizing for America, or the Obama campaign until the President and the Democratic party keep their promises to the gay community, our families, and our friends.

This was launched yesterday. I haven’t taken the pulse of the other contributors at BTB, so I can’t speak for them. But I support this wholeheartedly. One of the DNC’s most loyal constituencies — and among the most reliable sources for cash and sweat equity — has been taken for granted for far too long. The goals of the “pause” are pretty simple:

We are asking voters to pledge to withhold contributions to the Democratic National Committee, Organizing for America, and the Obama campaign until the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is passed, Don\’t Ask Don\’t Tell (DADT) is repealed, and the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is repealed -– all of which President Obama repeatedly promised to do if elected.

…Candidate Obama promised during the campaign to be the gay community\’s “fierce advocate.” He and the Democratic party have not kept their promise.

Longtime LGBT activist David Mixner is on board with the boycott, along with Andy Towle, Michael Goff, Dan Savage, Pam Spaulding, Robin Tyler, Paul Sousa, Bil Browning, Jane Hamsher and Michaelangelo Signorile. Interestingly, even the Human Rights Campaign appears to have tacitly endorsed the boycott, in an email response to David Dayen at Firedog Lake:

“Individual donors should always make their own careful assessments of how to spend limited political contributions. We all need to focus on the legislative priorities identified by AmericaBlog and with whatever tactic individuals decide to employ, the ultimate objective needs to be securing the votes we need to move our legislative agenda forward.”

You can sign the petition and take the pledge here, and you can spread the word to your friends and family here.

Timothy Kincaid

November 10th, 2009


I think that the decision by the New York Democratic Senate leadership to ignore marriage equality in the special session is also an indicator that the Party in general has no real commitment to equality for our community. Our equality will be considered only when it is convenient, incidental, and comes with no cost of political capital.

I think that we have made the mistake of paying far too much for far too little.

Ben in Oakland

November 10th, 2009

I absolutely support this. I long ago stoppped giving money to the DNC after DOMA and DADT, and told them why. I have given money to individual pioliticians only a few times– John Anderson and Howard dean come to mind.

in 1976 (!), Jimmy Carter (!) spoke out against the briggs Initiative (!) while in california. Our Previous Fierce Advocate, Bill, was too busy getting Monica’d in the Oval Office to to stand up for us, though he gave fine speeches. No stern lectures from the Bully Pulpit about the un-American aspects of enforcing religious bigtory.

Our current Fierce Advocate, Mr. Obama, or as I am starting to refer to him , Mr. Ofama (Our Fierce Advocate My Ass) could have said some thing about the use of his words and images in the fight against H8. I could understand then why he might not.

But he is in office, and he could have said something about maine. He could have talked about religious freedom. He could have talked about the inherent un-American-ness, (or entire American-ness) of civil rights as a popularity contest. He could have thrown his weight behind Taucscher’s repeal of DADT. He could ordered the justice department NOT to defend DOMA. He apparently has the legal out to ignore DADT.

And congress is barely any better. a two vote margin on a highly defective health care bill. Still wasting lives and wealth in a land war in Asia. As Vizzini (?) noted. NEVER fight a land war in Asia.

Our Fierce Advocate, My Ass.

If I am going to get screwed, I would prefer not to be paying for it.


November 10th, 2009

I see only one way to make the Democrats notice you: start voting Republican. Or for a third party, if it has any viability (at least in local elections).
If you vote predictably, why should anyone in power take notice, much less try to fix what is not, for them, broken?

John B

November 10th, 2009

I’m signing this too. My only quibble is with the wording. I’m OK with resuming support before all three items are signed and delivered, but I’ll be waiting for tangible progress on each issue (and speeches most certainly do not count). We’re going to get slammed for ‘impatience’ but what’s pushing us all towards this is the lack of any indication that the Dems will risk any political capital whatever on this.

Last year, I explained to gay friends my support of Obama over Hillary by saying that I didn’t believe Hillary would actually bother doing anything for us, but I thought Obama would at least give it a shot. I don’t think we needed much from the Dems this year to be satisfied that we are on the agenda, and to remain patiently supportive. Instead, we’re getting exactly what I’d feared from a HIllary administration — so far, anyway.

Frequent Flier

November 10th, 2009

Nice to see the HRC’s response. They have come in for a lot of criticism in the last year. Some of that criticism was justified and healthy, some was not. They were the largest donors to the No on 1 and Approve 71 campaigns, provided valuable support to both, especially in Washington and were the driving force behind the hate crimes law being passed with Judy Shepard. They are our most powerful political group, my company gives them a large donation every year as do many others in Corporate America, and they have connections no other group can match, which like it or not is essential to advancing our legislative goals. BUT, we can no longer tolerate them giving a pass to lukewarm supporters and fair weather friends. Not one more penny to candidates who don’t support full equality. And NO invitations to events and fundraisers for politicians who are not fully supportive neither. Finally, as another poster noted, and most importantly, NO VOTES. Vote Green. Vote Libertarian. Hell Vote Republican as I would have done in NY 23 if the candidate is supportive of your civil rights. But no more votes to people who are comfortable treating you as a second or third class citizen.

Regan DuCasse

November 10th, 2009

Same as Ben, I was done donating to the party when DADT and DOMA went into effect during the Clinton admin.

I voted for Obama because I definitely didn’t want McCain in the WH.
But our current POTUS, for a lawyer…he’s not defining gay citizens too well.
But he was here in CA…several times, hitting up wealthy Dems, that included wealthy gays and lesbians.

One of whom, David Geffen, outright and very publicly refused to even see Obama or give him any money during his early fundraising efforts.
Eventually and too often now, the Dems and Repubs are wearing the same clothes.
The clothes of ‘me first, my own political ends first, don’t expect me to REALLY keep a promise first’ politician.

Ben in Oakland

November 10th, 2009

Thanks, Regan. As always, bang on. :)


November 10th, 2009

I never gave money to the Democrats or Obama in the first place, but I’m glad to see others committing to this.


November 10th, 2009

I donated to Obama during the campaign, but I wouldn’t give him a penny if he asked me to today.

I find it laughable that the HRC is coming out in support of this. They’re as culpable as the DNC imo and they should be right up there on the list:


November 10th, 2009

Good. Now if we can more Republicans to do likewise when it comes to the GOP perhaps we’ll see some real change.

Ah, who am I kidding? The nuts run the asylum in both parties. Well at least the political theater is fun to watch…

Emily K

November 10th, 2009


I decided to re-register after the presidential election. I’m ready to go Independent.

Lynn David

November 11th, 2009

My own health care has run me out of funds anyway. If that aspect of the democrat’s plan doesn’t get going I sure won’t have any money to give them. So count me out/in… which ever which way.



November 11th, 2009

Oh, what to do…

I completely support this in principle, and will absolutely not donate a single penny to the DNC. I will donate to those LGBT candidates who I feel actually pursue LGBT interests as well as hold positions on other issues I agree.

However, when it comes to ballot box time, I have great qualms about this. Essentially, I find myself in the Independent-Green category (although I am registered Democratic). At the State Legislative, Gubinatorial, and National Levels (both executive and legislative), I feel marking a vote for third parties gives the Republican party more strength. While I find the Democratic party intolerable at this moment, when it comes to LGBT issues, I would rather deal with Democratic inaction than negative-LGBT legislative action.

Until the United States develops European-style party coalition to truly embrace third parties into the legislative bodies, I truly don’t know how to vote at the ballot box, except to gnash my teeth and — provided the national or state Democratic candidate isn’t an anti-gay zealot — vote Democratic.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.