The Daily Agenda for Friday, February 10
Again anti-gays blindly and gleefully shoot themselves in the foot
Rep. Walsh leads with her heart
Advocate, WaPo, AP Get it Wrong On Anti-Homosexuality Bill
Uganda Executive, Parliament Tussle Over Anti-Homosexuality BIll
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, February 9
Something I'd Like to Know, But Never Can
The Solicitor General impact
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapist try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 450 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Leo
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
OK, so now the next obvious question is how did the one-man-one woman union become stronger since the passage of Prop 8?
Alex
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
Making divorce illegal would be impractical? But I thought these people had the awesome power of Jesus on their side! Oh well, at least it’s nice to catch an anti-gay activist in a rare moment of honesty.
wackadoodle
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
is their a link to this?
John D
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
If you Google “John Marcotte,” this it the top hit under news:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ityjaAAMYI7StNV2uur-vrfyGuFgD9CA3KB80
Timothy Kincaid
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
Sorry guys. Link is there now.
Burr
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
What’s impractical about banning divorce? That’s been the status quo for ages!
Ben in Oakland
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
And i think Olson and Boies should be informed of this statement. It’s strong evidence that tjhis is not aobut hwat the anti-gays say it is aobut.
Does anyone know how to contact them?
Johnson
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
The “A-Ha Quote”–anti-gay animus pure and simple. Here it is folks, as if anyone didn’t know that already.
Ellen
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
Join the FB page of 2010 California Protection of Marriage Act.
Eddie89
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
Ben,
As far as contacts, I was not able to find any “direct” contact information.
But, on their website, American Foundation for Equal Rights, I was able to find that they also have a Facebook account and a Twitter account. Perhaps leaving a message on either of these sites may get their attention.
Richard W. Fitch
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
If banning SSM is ‘a practical way’ to protect traditional marriage, why is it not the case that banning divorce is also a practical means to protect traditional marriage?
Timothy Kincaid
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
Richard,
Banning divorce is impractical because too many voters actually know (or are) divorcees and will not fall for lies.
And more importantly, there just isn’t enough animus towards divorcees to get their fellow citizens to infringe upon their freedom.
Banning the rights of the less well known and much more hated gay people is far far more “practical”.
Emily K
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
50% of marriages end in divorce. That’s a LOT of people being affected in one way or another. It’s no wonder it wouldn’t fly.
Vancity
November 30th, 2009 | LINK
Here is contact information:
Ted Olson:
http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/tolson
David Boies:
http://www.bsfllp.com/lawyers/data/0001
Donnchadh
December 1st, 2009 | LINK
What I find even more telling is that he goes from “everyone would like it” to “banning it” as if this were automatically the best approach. If asked to tackle inflation he would think of banning wages raises.
homer
December 1st, 2009 | LINK
Divorce was illegal in the Territory of Arizona until 1873, when Governor Safford got the Territorial Legislature to grant him a divorce. For the next few years, divorces could only be granted by the Legislature. Obviously, a return to this type of system would save many, many traditional marriages that are in danger of being destroyed by homosexual marriges in Massachusetts and Iowa!
Leave A Comment