Atlanta mayor-elect finds his election to be confirmation of anti-marriage position

Timothy Kincaid

December 6th, 2009

From the Sunday Paper interview with Kasim Reed:

In District 6, the most prevalently gay district in the city, Norwood got 70 percent of the vote, despite your extremely strong voting record on gay issues and Norwood\’s complete lack of such a record. I\’m hearing that it was because of your statement regarding your religious beliefs about [against] gay marriage. What do you think about that?

I think the voters have spoken. I\’ve shared where I am on that. I\’ve shared how I have personally worked through the issue. I have an unmatched track record on legislation that supports the LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered] community. I would like to ask them if they would be willing to throw aside a whole career of voting supportively for the gay community because of one issue. I have voted with them over and over again. Would they toss that aside? My position on this issue is exactly where Jim Martin was when he ran for the U.S. Senate. The LGBT community supported him. I would ask those voters only this: I would like to see you apply this standard to all candidates equally, to be as forceful on this issue as you have been with me.

Yep, he thinks “the voters have spoken” and that they endorse his discrimination. I feared that this would be the conclusion if Reed were elected

Lindoro Almaviva

December 6th, 2009

I would like to ask them if they would be willing to throw aside a whole career of voting supportively for the gay community because of one issue.

To answer Mr. Reed:

YES, I would. Why?

1. Because your words have proved that you do not believe that I am your equal.

2. Your words have proved that your support is nothing more than political opportunism, and one thing that I have learned about opportunists is that they are as steadfast as a fart in a wind storm.

3. Your words have proved that inherently you believe that I am a 2nd class citizen; that should be happy with the crumbs you, in your infinite mercy, throw at me.

4. Your words have proved that you are incapable of supporting me for who I am and your support is entirely based on what I can do for you

5. Your words have proved that somehow you believe that you hold a moral high ground over me and that gives you a free pass in treating me with condescension and insult my intelligence and above all insult ME.

See? For me it would be very easy to drop you and not look behind.

I do not want someone who votes for my causes because they are popular or because it is politically correct, or advantageous. I want someone to vote with me because they are convinced it is the right thing to do. You do not get that.

Cole

December 7th, 2009

Kasim Reed wasn’t the best choice for gay people and Atlanta. Mary Norwood was.

Roger

December 8th, 2009

“I have an unmatched track record on legislation that supports the LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered] community.

Like hell you do. Check the voting record for John Lewis, a civil rights giant and a fellow legislator for the Atlanta area. There you will see a legislative record on gay rights that is truly unmatched.

“I would like to ask them if they would be willing to throw aside a whole career of voting supportively for the gay community because of one issue.”

That’s because marriage equality is not just “one issue,” it is 1,138 issues (link). It is disingenuous to dismiss marriage equality as being just about the word marriage, because it is so much more than that. When you stand against marriage equality, you are saying that you believe that gay people are not deserving of the same civil rights guaranteed by the state as straight people are. That, sir, makes you a bigot and not an ally of the GLBT community, regardless of what your voting record says.

“My position on this issue is exactly where Jim Martin was when he ran for the U.S. Senate. The LGBT community supported him.”

And who else would we have supported? Saxby Chambliss? ROFL!

I personally voted for Martin because he was significantly the lesser of the two evils, not because he wowed me with his platform on gay rights. His support from the GLBT community was received only because the alternative was so much worse.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.