January 5th, 2010
Last year, the Rhode Island legislature voted to recognize domestic partners and allow them to have one single right: the right to make funeral arrangements for each other. The law was based on compassion for Mark Goldberg, a Rhode Island resident who spent more than a month trying to collect the body of the man he’d spent the last 17 years with and to whom he was married.
Although it is hard for any compassionate person to object to the notion, Governor Carcieri vetoed the legislation, seeing it as “a disturbing trend over the past few years of the incremental erosion of the principles surrounding traditional marriage”. To Carcieri’s credit he did meet with representatives of gay organizations, including Goldberg, and announced that he would be willing to consider an “almost anything but marriage” domestic partnership law which would resolve a number of issues, rather than an incremental approach.
So then who would possibly want to oppose the overturn of this veto?
Hello? did you really need to ask? The National Organization for Marriage, of course. They sent out an email to the legislators begging them to uphold the veto.
The said that there’s no reason to allow domestic partners any rights at all and besides it was all just Goldman’s carelessness. He could have just hunted down a special form and had it notarized, you see.
Rather than being compassionate, the legislation in question is actually an exploitation of Mr. Goldberg’s tragedy by the homosexual-marriage activists in Rhode Island. Despite their claims to the contrary, these bills serve simply as “Trojan Horses” for homosexual-marriage.
Really, they should just change their name to “The National Organization for No Recognition of Same-Sex Couples, Whatsoever”.
But today the Rhode Island legislature ignored NOM’s impassioned plea for bigotry and overrode Carcieri’s veto. (LA Times)
Rhode Island lawmakers voted Tuesday to allow same-sex and unmarried couples the right to plan the funerals of their late partners, overriding a veto by the governor, who warned it eroded traditional marriage.
The bill passed 67-3 in the House and 31-3 in the Senate, and enjoyed support from several Republican lawmakers, who in the same party as Gov. Don Carcieri, an adamant opponent of same-sex marriage in a state that does not recognize gay unions.
Although Rhode Island is overwhelmingly controlled by the Democratic Party and is overwhelmingly Catholic (who support marriage equality in higher numbers than other demographics). But despite polls showing that the residents strongly support marriage (and even more strongly civil unions) the Party leadership in both the Senate and the House are opposed to equality. So couple recognition is limited to burial rights.
But this is, nevertheless, an important step. The legislature has recognized – in overwhelming numbers – that same-sex relationships are legitimate and comprised of real Rhode Islanders who need the state to work with them, not against them, in pursuing a good life.
Pam’s House Blend reports the “no” votes:
The three representatives who voted no were
Arthur Corvese (D-North Providence)
Jon Brien (D-Woonsocket)
Lisa Baldelli-Hunt (D-Woonsocket)
In the Senate, there were two votes (on the two versions of the bill) and the no votes were slightly different on each one:
Leo Blais (R-Coventry)
Michael Pinga (D-West Warwick)
Marc Cote (D-Woonsocket) on one version, and
Leo Blais (R-Coventry)
Marc Cote (D-Woonsocket)
Edward O’Neill (I-Lincoln) on the other.
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.