Deacon succinctly lays out Catholic objection to marriage equality

Timothy Kincaid

January 8th, 2010

Writing in Catholic Online, Deacon Keith Fournier laments that courts have treated Janet Jenkins with respect and honored the commitments that she and Lisa Miller made. In the midst of his tirade, is a sentence that epitomizes the attitudes of those who rally forth to oppose equality.

They want the State to treat homosexual partnerships as the equivalent of marriage, thereby denying real marriage and the family founded upon it, the favored legal place it has long held as the first society.

It is not that they wish to “preserve tradition” or “uphold the definition” or are “worried about the children”. Those are just subterfuges presented to the media to distract from the real reason.

No, they truly believe that they deserve a favored legal place and that our lives, our relationships and our very citizenship is inferior to their own.

Richard W. Fitch

January 8th, 2010

It is somewhat ironic that this spew has echoes of the battle against inter-racial marriage – a battle which was also fought (and won) against the state of Virginia.

Burr

January 8th, 2010

Why do anti-gays want SPECIAL rights?

Priya Lynn

January 8th, 2010

Male/female marriages won’t be any less favoured when gays are allowed to marry – we still favour marital relationships over all others.

Burr

January 8th, 2010

BTW I love all the scare quotes in this story.

Kathy

January 8th, 2010

Marriage equality will not DENY us married folks anything. It will simply say that our neighbors are our equals. It stuns me that that concept is a threat to people who identify as followers of Jesus. Isn’t he the one who said the big rules are “Love God and love your neighbor”? How do they look at their neighbors and say, “Your family is less precious than mine.”?

Trevor

January 8th, 2010

That’s funny because I lament that religiously motivated speech hasn’t been outlawed for the fraud and lies that it is.

GreenEyedLilo

January 8th, 2010

Whatever else he is, he’s honest. Gotta give him that. I actually kind of wish that others would stop blathering about “preserving the traditional family” and such, and take that sort of approach.

Lindoro Almaviva

January 8th, 2010

Preserve tradition or perverse tradition? I can’t make up the difference

Marlene

January 10th, 2010

As someone who does guest lectures for local college classes, I *love* bringing up “traditional marriage”! I usually ask the single girls:

Just how much is your bride price?
Have you already been promised to another?
Are you here only to get your Mrs degree?
When you do get married, will you have as many kids your husband decrees as is his right?

*That’s* traditional marriage, my dears!

Amicus

January 10th, 2010

I was going to post this over there, just to see if they would post it. I’m always torn between trying to talk to these people and recognizing when one is ultimately talking to stone hearts.

—————-

Deacon Keith Fournier,

It’s sad to read your article.

By it’s own choice, the Church is absent in the lives of these two lesbians, withholding the kind of spiritual support and guidance that would value relationships over dissolution.

Yet, the Church NOW wants to be involved, against even the courts. How odd.

Open up your heart. Even though this is a tragic case, perhaps you can stop treating it as a exemplar of all that is wrong with gay couples. Truly, their problems are little different than non-gay couples. Open your heart, if you have ears to hear, because gay marriage is good for all marriage and divorce is painful for everyone. Stop being afraid of the “Cultural Revolution” wholesale and start understanding how much better and more obvious it would be if you were to embrace loving, committed relationships, than to so open scorn them.

If you cannot open your heart, then stand behind us, because the unexamined malice in your heart is showing. Truly, if society’s worst problem is two parents out of millions who care about their daughter, it is because your blindness has put priorities upside down. For one thing, how many heterosexual parents have physically destroyed their unwanted children, yet here you identify gays as the judicial threat to our national future. Please meditate on that. I’m sure that a right spirit will move you that that cannot be correct.

Perhaps your stipulation that “The record shows that Isabella is an ‘A’ student in school, a happy, well adjusted and loving child”, might be able to guide you farther. This was achieved while Isabella had but one parent, yes? Perhaps God’s wisdom is greater than your understanding, your doctrine? Two are better than one, but look what one alone has achieved.

And what if any student were gay or lesbian? Your Church would counsel them a life of celibacy/denial. Is it any wonder that even a non-involved parent would shudder at that unnatural teaching, in a society that has thriving, creative, and fully-functioning gay people and couples all around?

Last, you shouldn’t give yourself a pass on the fundamental injustice you appear to want to set-up, an injustice in which some couples can use fertility technology, yet others cannot.

Amicus

January 10th, 2010

er…”post it” should be “accept it”

“it’s own” s/b “its own”

CPT_Doom

January 11th, 2010

Actually Amicus, the piece is even more disingenuous that you point out. As a former Catholic I can tell you that Ms. Miller’s current lifestyle choices – as a divorced single mother and as a member of an evangelical congregation – are not supported as moral by the Roman Catholic Church, but somehow Mr. Fornier conveniently ignores Miller’s sins, even as he lies about Jenkins (e.g., not mentioning her paying child support and claiming she has not tried to have contact with her child – both are patently false).

It is ironic that a Catholic writer would defend a fornicating heretic and blasphemer, but I guess the political attacks on LGBT Americans are more important than the petty religious differences among various Christian sects.

Ephilei

January 12th, 2010

Good catch!

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Charlotte Pulls "Compromise" With State Over HB2

Premier of Australia's Victoria State Apologizes for Historic Homosexuality Convictions

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today in History, 1610: Virginia Colony Enacts North America's First Sodomy Statute

Today In History, 1983: Pat Buchanan Says AIDS Is Nature's "Awful Retribution"

Today In History, 1988: Britain Enacts Section 28

Padres Finally Respond to Gay Men's Chorus Debacle

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.