It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Gay Couples Excluded from Immigration Bill Markup
How To Spot A Swivel-Eyed Loon
The Daily Agenda for Wednesday, May 22
House of Commons officially passes marriage equality
British Commons Approves Marriage Equality Bill
Email address of Attorney General prosecuting 18 year old Florida lesbian
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ryan
January 24th, 2010 | LINK
Is there a way to download if you only have an MP3 player?
Gabe Arana
January 24th, 2010 | LINK
It’s an mp3 file — are you not able to hear it by clicking “play” in the browser?
Eddie89
January 24th, 2010 | LINK
Is there a way to download your podcast without installing itunes software on my PC?
I have an mp3 player, not ipod, and would love to listen to your podcast on it, but I do not wish to install the intrusive and resource hungry itunes software.
Help!
Burr
January 24th, 2010 | LINK
Yes I would appreciate an RSS feed of the podcasts, so then I can subscribe to it with Zune software as opposed to iTunes (and others using their own preferred software). I don’t like iTunes and I have a Zune, not an iPod.
Scott B
January 24th, 2010 | LINK
@ Eddie89
You can play it on the web page then goto your Temporary Internet Files & folders.
Wiht most the folders it’s in it’s hidden.
You need to unhide the folders then look in it for it, With this podcast its name is BTBPODCAST12210(1).mp3.
Just copy and past to the folder you like.
Eddie89
January 24th, 2010 | LINK
Sure, I can go and hunt it down in some hidden, temporary internet files folders.
But, why put me, the listener, through such acrobatics?!
Why can’t BTB just throw up a link to the raw MP3 file that I can Right Click, Save As… and then copy it to my MP3 player?
Dr. Matthew
January 25th, 2010 | LINK
Is this question about disentangling “principled opposition” still worth asking? And haven’t the experts at the Olsen/Boise trial convinced an increasing number that the answer was, is, and is always no?
John
January 25th, 2010 | LINK
Interesting podcast. Keep up the good work!
Ryan
January 26th, 2010 | LINK
You guys kept saying Starr Jones when you meant Sherri Shepard. :) I’m glad you finally addressed the question of how SCOTUS might eventually rule on this, though a little frustrated that none of you will acknowledge the very obvious fact that the vote will be 5-4 upholding Prop 8. I’m not sure how anyone can resonamly come to any other conclusion. This is a very partisain court, and all the talk of suspect class this, and equal protection that is wholly and completely irrelevant. The Court will rule on party lines no matter what evidence is presented, just as they always do with controversial issues. It’s bizarre to me that anyone could believe otherwise. They even helpfully made it even more clear by siding with the defendants(5-4, of course) with their absurd notion that “irreparable harm” will come to those testifying against gay people. Are we to believe that they think gays are so insidious and evil that they will harm people who testify against them, but hey, let’s let them get married anyway? Ridiculous. We all know where this is going. Why don’t Olsen and Boises?
tina
January 27th, 2010 | LINK
@Dr Matthew:
I found their discussion about “pricipled opposition” helpful and extrememly timely.
Tonight, my church’s bible study’s topic is “Is the Church homophobic?”
I see this as an opportunity to open up discussion & address the very roots of prejudice against gays- and the reaction will be mixed.
However, the term “homophobic” gives me pause. It feels like saying “you are homophobic” will be like walking in there and throwing a bucket of kerosene on a bed of coals.
Not a great way to frame the discussion facilitate open-minded reflection.
I think it’s going to be extrememly important to make the distinction between bigotry and prejudice. Otherwise, walls will go up (no one likes to think of themselves as a bigot).
Don’t know if that’s what you were referring to, but I was grateful for that “disentangling.” Helped me clear a few things up.
Ok, now wish me luck! ha
Leave A Comment