Obama: Finally Repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”

Jim Burroway

January 27th, 2010

The President’s State of the Union address, I thought, was one of the finest addresses ever given. He chastised the largest majority in recent history for its failure to get substantial work done, and he challenged the minority to live up to its responsibility to offer solutions if it is going to insist that a 60-vote super-majority will be required to get anything done in the Senate. This is a fighting spirit that has been missing from the White House over the past year. I frankly hope the President recognizes that change requires leadership from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, leadership which won’t come from the mob on Capital Hill.

But hope and reality are two different things. And given what we’ve seen over the past year, it’s  hard to get too excited over this particular part of the President’s address:

My Administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination. We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate. This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are.

The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network calls for a sense of urgency:

We applaud the President tonight for his call to Congress to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” this year. We very much need a sense of urgency to get this done in 2010. We call on the President to repeal the archaic 1993 law in his defense budget currently now being drafted, that is probably the only and best moving bill where DADT can be killed this year. As Rep. Patrick Murphy and Sen. Gillibrand have made clear, this is the year to repeal the law. What is also needed is more attention and leadership to win repeal. The American public, including conservatives, is overwhelmingly with the commander in chief on this one.


January 27th, 2010

How nice, he’ll work with congress on doing something he doesn’t need congress to do – he can do it all by himself. But he hasn’t and is now passing the buck. What a friend we have!


January 27th, 2010

While it’d be nice if he did a stop loss order, he’d still need Congress to make it permanent. That’s not passing the buck, that’s reality. Acting alone won’t solve it once and for all.

That said I ain’t holding my breath.

Jim Burroway

January 27th, 2010

Actually, he cannot repeal a law all by himself. What he can do is temporarily halt investigations under DADT, but all that would do is relieve the pressure off of Congress from doing anything. Then when Obama is gone, a future president can just as easily rescind the order.

While I know a lot of people are pushing for Obama to issue an executive order, I think it would actually hinder DADT’s repeal rather than hasten it.

Timothy Kincaid

January 27th, 2010

Hmmm… his first step in working with Congress was apparently asking Congress not to hold hearings until he could announce that he was working with Congress.


January 27th, 2010

While it’s true that he could not repeal DADT on his own, he could have issued the stop loss order last year & used his bully pulpit to put the pressure on Congress to do the work of repealing it for good. Since a repeal is something supported by the majority of Americans (including a majority of conservatives) it shouldn’t have been hard to get it done. Instead he did nothing, paid a little lip service and then trotted this DADT repeal schpiel out again when he knows he needs to regain some lost support of LGBT voters. I’ll believe it when I see it.


January 27th, 2010

Ready…set…PUNT to the do-nothing Congress which can’t pass a bill with a super majority. If you thought the Republicans would filibuster a healthcare bill just to score political points what do you think they’ll do now that you’re handing them a “culture war” issue? Its a no-brainer: they’ll filibuster it and use it to whip their tea-bagger base into an angry, stupid frenzy.


January 28th, 2010

I’ll repeat what my household has been telling the increasingly desperate Democratic party every time they’ve called us for donations in the past month: I be taken for granted, and pretty words won’t cut it. You’ll get my cash when I see some action, and not a penny until then.


January 28th, 2010

Ummm… no patois intended… that should have said “won’t be”… taken for granted.

I may, however, be taken for illiterate.


January 28th, 2010

To quote the intelligence community, “Trust but verify”


January 28th, 2010

After a year, Obama is still doling out bits and pieces. In the campaign, he promised a lot of things: an inclusive ENDA, a repeal of DOMA and DADT, the list went on. Now, it’s just DADT. We don’t need a crumb here and there. We need the same rights that other citizens take for granted!

Timothy Kincaid

January 28th, 2010

I got an email “from President Barack Obama” asking for donations within an hour of the speech.


January 28th, 2010

This president fixated on one thing and one thing only. He wants health care reform. He will live and die politically on this one thing. After the Massachusetts defeat, he has tried to appear as if moving more to the center, but make no mistake, he is STILL ONLY interested in this screwed up health care reform.
Democrats need to learn from we independents. Just because he is a democrat does not mean he is on “your side.” Obama is FOR gays when they VOTE for him…after elected, his actions speak the truth about Obama. He is a typical politician and NOTHING more.


January 28th, 2010

The only appropriate response to appeals for donations is “When we can marry, when we can serve in the military, when our jobs are secure, when DADT and DOMA are history, THEN ask me for a donation.”

Lt. Choi’s post speech arrived in email this morning. He said DADT is “immoral” and that he was disappointed with the lack of substance in the President’s remarks and called his words “unacceptable.”

Ditto for me, too.


January 28th, 2010

Talk is cheap in Obamatown, very cheap. Obama prides himself on his ability to sway people with rhetoric. I prefer reality myself. So when the reality comes we’ll see but in the meantime shouldn’t we all be happy that we got a nice, shiny ambassador and a few other token appointments?

Audrey the Liberal

January 28th, 2010

I’m a fan of your blog CLS, so it’s really nice to see you posting here on Box Turtle Bulletin. Have you thought of becoming a regular contributor?

Mark F.

January 28th, 2010

Prediction: no repeal of DADT anytime before 2013. $100 bet anyone?

Mark F.

January 28th, 2010

And here’s some insight about Obama’s character: he’s ordering the murder of *suspected* terrorists. No trial, no nothing. Just like the Nazis and Communists used to do. but hey, continue to pretend he’s a good, well meaning guy.



January 28th, 2010

I would rather see some action on getting rid of DOMA (Defense Of Marriage Act) and giving couples Federal benefits.

Right now, we keep fighting over the “word” marriage and while I agree we should be able to have the term etc., it still doesn’t give same-sex couples true Federal rights even if they are allowed to marry in their state.

DADT would be great and should be repealed so I hope it is done this year. And when it is, it should be retroactive so that all those who were bounced out of the military just for being gay get their full honors and stuff.

Our armed forces are stretched so thin that you’d think that they would welcome anyone who wants to enlist and maybe they wouldn’t have to go on these 3-4-5 tours of duty.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.