Another Conservative for Gay Marriage
Jim Burroway
January 29th, 2010
This time, it’s Don Imus on Fox Business:
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoricAnother Exodus Conference Is Upon Us. Let's Review.
For Our Opponents: Talking to Your Kids About Same-Sex Marriage
The Daily Agenda for Tuesday, June 18
The Daily Agenda for Monday, June 17
The Daily Agenda for Sunday, June 16
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, June 15
The Daily Agenda for Friday, June 14
South Africa Teen’s Death Shows It’s Time to Ban Ex-gay Therapy Everywhere
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Lindsey
January 29th, 2010 | LINK
good on Imus for having this on his show!
Audrey the Liberal
January 29th, 2010 | LINK
I’m so conservative that I approve of San Francisco City Hall marriages, adoption by same-sex couples, and New Hampshire’s recently ordained Episcopal bishop. Gays want to get married, have children, and go to church. Next they’ll be advocating school vouchers, boycotting HBO, and voting Republican.-P.J.O’Rourke
Richard Rush
January 29th, 2010 | LINK
This is for Ray who, in a comment on another posting, expressed his great joy that the video was closed-captioned. So I thought I’d mention that this one is not. I know this is not a BTB issue but just wanted to mention it anyway.
I’m thinking closed-captioning should become required under the ADA laws.
AJD
January 29th, 2010 | LINK
The quote from P.J. O’Rourke is dead-on. I refuse to join any political party, but I’m basically a moderate who would probably vote for Republicans around 35-50% of the time…if they didn’t constantly use homophobia and other manifestations of redneck bullshit to win votes.
I think the GOP is wasting a lot of support from gays by constantly attacking us.
oakland753
January 30th, 2010 | LINK
Having listened to Don Imus over the years, I do not see him as any big conservative. He has supported many liberal causes and been very gracious to liberal folks on his programs. I would suspect he is an independent voter and not what one would think of as a conservative. I wonder if Jim B has ever listened to Don on a consistent basis. The fact that he is now on Fox Business news does not make him conservative. Fox news has several liberal commentators, Juan Williams being among the most noted.
Ray
January 31st, 2010 | LINK
Thank you Richard. I appreciated your sensitivity and that of BTB as well. I certainly do understand that the task of getting captioning rolling is an enormous one and that small sites like BTB cannot be saddled with resolving that problem. What distinguishes BTB from virtually all other sites is that when they incorporate a video into their site, it is always accompanied with an explanation, a story, a dialog that helps me at least understand the context of the video.
Ordinarily, commentators simply slap up a video, give it a title like, “EVERYONE Should Know About This” and provide absolutely no clue as to the content of the video.
I often read the comments people post in response that that kind thing to see if they can provide insight into the video.
Many don’t. Here’s a typical set of comments to a hypothetical video titled “EVERYONE Should Know About This”
Person 1: Thanks for that.
Person 2: What was the thing about the police?
Person 3: That wasn’t the police. It was a security guard.
Person 4: That was sooo awesome. Hope Rachael does a story about this.
Person 5: I was at the scene that day and that happened to me too right after the first guy got it.
Anyway, I’m very thankful for BTB’s thoughtful remarks that at least give me a foot in the door. I just try to raise awareness when I have the opportunity and it’s nice to know that someone listens.
Vincent Pinson
February 11th, 2010 | LINK
Don Imus a conservative? Since when?
Leave A Comment