CA State GOP Rep Comes Out, Defends Anti-Gay Record

Jim Burroway

March 8th, 2010

CA Rep. Roy AshburnCalifornia State Sen. Roy Ashburn, the conservative Republican who was arrested last week for driving while intoxicated after having left a Sacramento gay bar, came out as gay today on a Bakersfield radio station talk show. Asburn, who has a solidly anti-gay voting record however, continued to defend his record:

“I am gay. Those are the words that have been so difficult for me for so long. It is something that is personal, and I don’t believe I felt with my heart that being gay would affect how I do my job,” Ashburn said.

…Radio talk show host Inga Barks wanted assurances that Ashburn would continue to vote in a conservative manner on LGBT rights issues. Ashburn responded, “I believe firmly that my responsibility is to my constituents. I will take a careful look at each measure and apply that standard. How would they vote on this? How would they want me to vote on this,” adding that most people understood what that means.

Aaron

March 8th, 2010

There are no words.

Such a man has the gall to reap the benefits of a semi-liberated gay community and then go to his office and try to damage that same community? He should step down if he won’t fight for his own people.

And why on earth does he give a flip about his constituency? Since when does the majority dictate the rights of a minority?

GDad

March 8th, 2010

All epithets of “self-loathing” aside, this has got to be one pretty messed-up fellow.

AJD

March 8th, 2010

It’s one thing to be closeted, but another thing entirely to try and screw with the laws and serve the interests of those who want to force the rest of us into the closet as well.

I won’t be surprised if the religious right crazies in Orange County turn their backs on him now. See where all your self loathing got you, Roy?

Ben in Oakland

March 8th, 2010

he’s not in orange county.

I wrote aobut this joker in a letter to the Chron and to the bakersfield californian. If they don’t publish it, I will post it here.

Hypocrisy doesn’t even begin to cover it

Elliot

March 8th, 2010

Well, I’m glad he’s coming out on his own at least. I mean he could have done a Larry Craig with this one and tried to deny the obvious truth.

He’s been a douche bag with his voting record, but I think this interview is a demonstration of his cognitive dissonance. I have a hunch that this man might be in the middle of a turning point in his opinion on gay rights. So I’m holding out hope for him.

I hope I’m not wrong, though.

Rob

March 8th, 2010

He’s finished politically for sure, but now that he’s a pariah, I wonder if he’ll ever be able to enter a gay venue in California. I’m sure there are gays that would want his face to meet their fists.

Mortanius

March 8th, 2010

@Aaron “Since when does the majority dictate the rights of a minority?”
In every state in which there are laws on the books denying gays the right to marry where it was put to a simple majority vote. I’m sure the good people in California know very well the effects of the majority dictating the rights of the minority.
As for this guy, let’s hope he never shows his face in a gay bar again until he does the right thing and vote to support equality and not discrimination.

Timothy Kincaid

March 8th, 2010

The sad thing about these guys is that they back themselves into a corner and when things are discovered they have no one to turn to.

Ashburn will not be supported by those who hate “the homosexual agenda” because, when it really comes down to it, they don’t like “the homosexual” any more than they do his agenda. His “friends” are going to suddenly find themselves unavailable (“Oh I can’t have dinner with you Friday, I have to shampoo the cat”).

And he won’t be welcomed into the gay community with open arms. He says that he’s going to continue to oppose equality and decency and act as an enemy of our rights.

So who will he have? Until he finally make peace with himself, pretty much no one.

Fred in the UK

March 8th, 2010

Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion. – Edmund Burke, 1774

Frankly, what is the point of becoming a politician, to then do exactly what your best reading of the opinion polls tells you to do? (Obviously, politicians need to have an eye on the polls and re-election, but to never follow their own judgement and conscience appals me) If the public think that is how politicians should behave then surely they could save themselves some money by doing away with legislative assemblies and hiring a few professional opinion pollsters instead?

Not only are his claims both saddening and absurd on a personal level, but also on a political one.

Scott P.

March 8th, 2010

This man is despicable. His self-hatred has guided his voting, not his respect for his constituency. His last statement was made in hopes of keep his office. Soon, those who voted him in will be calling for his resignation, and if that fails they’ll start a recall.

Any gay establishment that allows him in it’s doors should be boycotted. He should receive from us the same as he’s given us, the back of the hand! Until, and ONLY until, he apologizes for his actions against us we, collectively, should turn our backs to him. This is not some young boy, just figuring himself out, this is a man who used his power to harm our community. That puts him on the outside, where he belongs!

elaygee

March 8th, 2010

I hope his constituents turn him out of office for being a closet alcoholic who committed DUIs.

John

March 8th, 2010

I can’t help but pity him. Oh I hope his political career comes to a screeching halt and he’s tossed out on his keister, but for the man himself I just pity him. I things are even better for the next generation so no man has to feel like they must live a lie and hate themselves so much like this man has done. It’s not just what he has done to himself, but the damage he has caused to his wife whom he has lied to for years and his children. Very sad.

Scott P.

March 8th, 2010

John, he’s younger than I am, and I grew up in Utah, in one of the most repressive parts of the country, so I’ll save my pity for his family, but NOT ONE SHRED for him!

John

March 8th, 2010

I said “pity”, Scott, not “excuse”. The man is sowing what he has reaped. I hope he is able to overcome what he had done and put his life back together, with honesty and atonement – outside of politics though.

Scott P.

March 8th, 2010

“Pity” should be reserved for those who have been harmed. He knew who he was, he had honest options open to him. He could’ve looked in himself, seen that he was not intrinsically evil and realized that being homosexual is neither good, nor bad, that it’s just part of who you are. instead he chose to lie, to himself, his wife, his children and the voters. All the harm here lays squarely on his shoulders, no-one else’s. He used his position of power to further his career by standing against us, hurting us. if he’d remained neutral I might pity him, but he didn’t! He catered to those who hate us, just to keep his office. Let him flagellate himself for a few years, come to us begging for forgiveness, then, and ONLY then, will he have earned my pity.

TampaZeke

March 8th, 2010

At least ole Maggie has another anti-gay “gay friend” that she can point to when trying to sell her homophobic venom.

AJD

March 8th, 2010

There’s a side of me that pities him also. I was a self-hating Catholic gay boy in my early teens also, and I could have grown up to be just like this guy.

That being said, he deserves to be tossed out of office. I hope that the gay community shuns him for a while too, and he has to go for at least a year or two without action, even if he offers money for it. That’ll give him plenty of time to think about what he’s done and consider ways to make amends.

homer

March 8th, 2010

So ironic that he was caught after leaving a gay bar. The ONLY reason this “man” could go to a gar bar is because the rest of us homosexuals have fought for civil rights so idiots like this man can go out and get a drink and pick up men without fear of being arrested (except for drunk driving, but that is another story I guess).

Mel

March 8th, 2010

I predicted this exact outcome. Ashburn is even wearing his opposition to “special rights” for gays as a badge of courage. He provides the precise foil the GOP has wanted to defend themselves against charges of homophobic. Now they will say “Look, we aren’t anti-gay at all. Even this open homosexual disagrees with the lifestyle”. Ashburn even opposes allowing gays (like himself) from serving in the military because he thinks they would prey on young male soldiers. This is sick stuff.

Fred in the UK

March 8th, 2010

The man has lost his reputation, his career and, I would imagine, his family. He has only himself to blame for his misfortune, he will have to live with himself for the rest of his days. He did, indeed, harm the gay community, but let us not imagine it was single-handed, other legislators who voted with him and voters and Republican activists who may have tried to oust him had he voted otherwise share some of the blame. Let us try to not to give ammunition to the other side who try to portray us as un-Christian monsters by appearing to hand out malice or revenge to a broken man.

Gueney

March 8th, 2010

So, does he realise that without all the rights that others have fought for even against votes like his, that only a few years ago, he would have been fired from his job for coming out? I wonder if he can appreciate that in years past, his wife could have had her marriage to him annulled, collected incredible payments from him, taken the kids, and he would have had no rights to see them…just for being gay. He would also have been arrested for indecent acts as well. That is only the tip of the iceberg. All of this, and yet, he will continue to vote for his constituents. I would ask who the hell he thinks he is, but clearly, he has no idea.

Rick Brentlinger

March 8th, 2010

He hasn’t really come to terms with being gay yet. He still believes all the despicable things he was taught about gays.

Most of us struggled to come to terms with the lies about gays that we heard growing up.

Give him some time and he’ll probably change his mind and come to regret his anti-gay votes.

Emily K

March 8th, 2010

you know, at least he came out. that way you don’t have to make any assumptions about him being a repressed closet-case. You can be aware that he is indeed, as a matter of fact, a self-loathing gay.

Eddie89

March 9th, 2010

I think that the greater, proud, openly gay community should hold out it’s hand and say to Mr. Ashburn that we are ready to accept him into our fold, if he stops his discriminatory actions and instead chooses to promote equality.

To have him admit the error of his ways. His anti-gay ways.

After all, the opposition will be doing the same thing. They want his quill in their quiver, a la Ted Haggard, ex-gays, etc.

What better way to turn him around, than to show him that the greater gay community is not who he thinks we are.

Let’s not prove it to him by hating him and wishing harm upon him.

Since the “Christians” themselves are not acting like their “Christ”, why don’t we do it?

John

March 9th, 2010

I understand the anger Scott and do not disagree with you about the mess he has created and now must clean up somehow, but what’s the point in my despising him? He knows what he’s done and what he must do now without my saying a word or wasting the energy is hating the man. He’s sowing what he has reaped. I wish him well in overcoming this – outside of political office.

Frijondi

March 9th, 2010

He appears to be old enough to have had high school civics before Prop. 13 destroyed public education in California. In which case, he probably understands representative democracy a lot better than he lets on in those fatuous statements. If he doesn’t, even his conservative constituents should think about giving him the old heave-ho.

darkmoonman

March 9th, 2010

He’s just another insanely anti-gay closet case. Without folks like him, there would be no Gay Republicans.

TonyJazz

March 9th, 2010

This man should have been ashamed of his voting record, whether he is gay or not.

What a pathetic little man. If he is seen in a local gay bar, he shouldn’t be met with fists, but he should be escorted to the street (and told not to return).

DN

March 12th, 2010

As an immigrant living in the US, I know the term, “Uncle Tom” is not to be used lightly… But isn’t this a case of a gay Uncle Tom?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Emphasis Mine

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1980: Tickets, Tux, and a Court Order -- A Male Couple Attends Senior Prom

Born On This Day, 1926: Christine Jorgenson

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1965: Second White House Protest

Today In History, 1981: "Polyester" Premieres

Today In History, 1987: Barney Frank Comes Out

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.