Barney Frank: ENDA Vote May Come In April

Jim Burroway

March 24th, 2010

That’s what Lisa Keen says:

Frank said passage of the health care reform package by the House now clears the way for that chamber to take up ENDA. He said the vote could come as early as this week but would more likely come right after the spring recess, March 29-April 9.

That sounds like an impossibly fast track for what is likely to be a contentious vote, if you ask me.

Sparky

March 24th, 2010

But it’s a great way to get people to shut up about it. Didn’t they do the same with DADT all last year? And this year for that matter with the “hearing”

Promise action – so people wait for it. Then promise again. Then promise another date. Then promise a vaguely unspecified date. Then when anyone gets angry you can say “look we’ve already said X”

Maybe I’m being cynical and Barney is just very hopeful on this – but it does seem to be a pattern

Scott P.

March 24th, 2010

I, for one, am not going to hold my breath.

Ray

March 24th, 2010

You mean no one wants to study this for a couple more decades before they vote on it?

tavdy79

March 24th, 2010

Give them a few weeks, then take to the streets and start chaining yourselves to things. You really do not want ENDA to have as much trouble in the US as it has had and continues to have in the UK.

The original legislation was a half-arsed piece of dross that didn’t do the job, so attempt two was introduced in the Equality Bill last year – only to be stymied by Baronness O’Cathain and several of the Lords Spiritual earlier this year. How they were allowed to do this I don’t really know, since it’s really nothing more than a rubber stamping of EU legislation dating back to 2003, yet somehow it happened.

Fred in the UK

March 24th, 2010

I am afraid that I must disagree with tavdy79. He / she is quite correct that the Equality Bill is having a difficult parliamentary course. However I think the comparison to ENDA needs to be qualified, the Equality Bill is far more expansive, it is an attempt to unify equality legislation with regards to gender, age, race, disability and sexual orientation covering employment, provision of goods and services, statutory requirements for public bodies, etc. However it is much less of an innovation when compared to existing legislation than ENDA. Much of what would be illegal under the Equality Bill is already illegal, the Bill reforms and unifies a patchwork raft of existing legislation. ENDA creates protections which are genuinely new in federal law.

I am unsure which legislation tavdy79 is referring to as ‘half-arsed’. I am aware that the European Commission were of the opinion the UK employment law did not comply with EU law because it believed the religious exemption to the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 was too broad. The regulations exempted cases where:-

a) the employment is for purposes of an organised religion;

(b) the employer applies a requirement related to sexual orientation—

(i) so as to comply with the doctrines of the religion, or

(ii) because of the nature of the employment and the context in which it is carried out, so as to avoid conflicting with the strongly held religious convictions of a significant number of the religion’s followers;

While I would agree that that exemption was too broad, given the small number of employees in the UK to whom it might apply I would not go as far as to call it half-arsed.

Tony P

March 24th, 2010

Tammy Baldwin thinks they have the votes necessary for both ENDA and to repeal DADT. Let us hope she is correct.

John

March 25th, 2010

I agree with Scott P: they can promise all they like but I don’t believe them anymore. Show me that my cynicism is misplaced by passing the damn bill already.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.