Portugal’s supreme court approves same-sex marriage bill

Timothy Kincaid

April 8th, 2010

The Portuguese supreme court had until today to approve or reject the same-sex marriage bill forwarded to them by the President. Today they have announced that it is not unconstitutional.

IOL Diario (Google translation)

The Constitutional Court Thursday gave this ‘green light’ to the law that allows marriage between same sex, whereas the norms sent by Ben to preventive control are constitutional, reports as saying.

Judge adviser Victor Gomes was the spokesperson for the ruling, which had eleven votes, of which seven presented the declaration to vote, and two dissenting opinions.

The constitution of Portugal has a clause supporting marriage but this was deemed not to be contradictory to including same-sex couples. (tvi 24 – Google translation)

The Constitutional Court held that “the extension of marriage to same-sex ‘is consistent with the recognition and protection of the family as” fundamental element of society, emphasizing that marriage is’ open concept’, which allows different political views.

In a memo distributed to the media after the public reading of the ruling on the request for preventive control of four rules of law that allows marriage between same-sex requested by the President read that the TC concludes that the legislative initiative ‘not violates the constitutional guarantee of marriage. ”

President Cavaco Silva now has until the 28th to approve or veto the bill. The legislature is believed to have adequate votes to override a veto.


April 8th, 2010

I think this ruling could have far reaching effect, even if it takes a while for it to take hold.

The argument against passing full marriage in Ireland, another predominantly Catholic country, is that their constitution requires that the government “protect marriage and the family” and that passing full marriage, as opposed to civil partnerships, MIGHT be unconstitutional.

I think the Portuguese Supreme Court just made a very good case that marriage equality for gay couples DOES protect marriage AND the family. In fact the only argument that could be made would be that the denial of marriage to a certain minority of the population harms marriage, and certainly harms families.

Parabéns Portugal!


April 8th, 2010

True, Tampa, but our Supreme Court has shown anti-gay precedent, somewhat recently in a child custody case.

Fred in the UK

April 8th, 2010


I think the Portuguese Supreme Court just made a very good case that marriage equality for gay couples DOES protect marriage AND the family.

I suspect it was more that the Supreme Court decided that the Legislature was within it its rights to reach that conclusion i.e. it would also have been constitutional to not pass the bill.

As for how much of an international precedent the decision will become I think depends on similarity of constitutional terminology about defending marriage. (I have no idea how similar accurate translations of countries constitutions are).

I doubt that this will have a great effect in Ireland. I have never heard an actual legal justification for not having gay marriage in Ireland. The countries constitution states that:-

The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it against attack.

Marriage itself remains undefined. I have never actually heard or read a lawyer argue that the Supreme Court would take the view that the legislature was not entitled to expand marriage to exclude gay couples. (If anyone can cite a lawyer saying so then please correct me.)

I strongly suspect that the constitutional argument is deployed mainly to either give a non-religious reason against gay marriage of justify the compromise of civil partnerships.


April 8th, 2010

is there any way this could influence italy’s supreme court or have they already made up their mind and simply delaying their decision?


April 8th, 2010

The comments on that page are disgusting. What is wrong with people? We have all these countries where the issue is settled, and the sky isn’t falling on them. Why can’t the haters see this?

Lynn David

April 8th, 2010

Can Brazil be far behind?

Jutta Zalud

April 9th, 2010

In case somebody can read Portugese, here is the full text of the decision (46 pages on my printer) http://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt/tc/acordaos/20100121.html
and the google-translation into English: http://translate.google.at/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tribunalconstitucional.pt%2Ftc%2Facordaos%2F20100121.html&sl=pt&tl=en&hl=&ie=UTF-8


April 9th, 2010

If/When passed, will marriage be allowed for nont-residents, non-citizens?

Timothy (TRiG)

April 9th, 2010

When I wrote to the Taoiseach (who’s also one of my TDs) about marriage equality, his response mentioned constitutional issues. He said he’s not sure whether same-sex marriage would be constitutional. I’ve read the constitution, and there’s a lot that needs changing (all those religious oaths for public servants, for a start), but there’s no specific definition of marriage. All the naysayers have to go on is a notion of the intent behind the word marriage when the constitution was written.


Fred in the UK

April 9th, 2010

@Timothy (TRiG)
Surely, the Taoiseach should have access to decent legal advice about whether same-sex marriage would be constitutional? Correct me if I am wrong but I doubt that he is arguing that the Irish State should never do anything that could ever reasonably be argued to be unconstitutional, even if there were a stronger argument that it was constitutional. Therefore I have difficulty in not concluding that the Taoiseach is hiding alleged constitutional issues to avoid either supporting or opposing same-sex marriage.

All that said I doubt much would change if the Taoiseach were forced to abandon the constitutional argument and state that many Irish Citizens are deeply opposed to same-sex marriage and Civil Partnership is a reasonable compromise.


April 9th, 2010

He wouldn’t have the backing of Polls on that though.


May 21st, 2010

Is there list of countries with same sex marriages, and the requirements for those respective countries?.. or at least links in each of those countries where the requirements would be posted? I am Canadian, but cannot get my Pakistani partner here for a marriage: his visa requests are being denied, even for a visitor. So we’re looking where we can both meet, get married, then confront the Canadian government with a request for spousal visa. thanks… Pierre [you may respond to my personal email address]

Timothy Kincaid

May 21st, 2010


I don’t have offhand a list of contacts, but the nations which conduct same-sex marriage are:

South Africa

There are also five US states plus Washington DC. And Mexico City might be an option.

Additionally, Canada may recognize other forms of partnership, such as the UK’s civil partners. Pretty much most of Europe has some form of partnership recognition.

Fred in the U.K.

May 21st, 2010


U.K. Embassies around the world can, and if needs be do, perform weddings (and Civil Partnerships) for British Nationals (so long as the host government does not object). I have no idea if Canadian Embassies operate similarly, but if they did you might be able to find one, in a country you could both visit, who would marry you.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.