DADT opponents heckle Obama at CA fundraiser

Timothy Kincaid

April 20th, 2010

President Obama was in Los Angeles yesterday to raise funds for Senator Barbara Boxer’s reelection campaign. Opponents of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell took the opportunity to draw attention to that issue. (USA Today)

“Repeal ‘don’t ask, don’t tell!” yelled several protesters at a Los Angeles fundraiser for the Democratic Party and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., referring to the Pentagon’s policy on gay servicemembers.

As the president said he agreed with the request — “we are going to do that; hey, hold on a second, hold on a second” — the protesters began echoing an Obama campaign chant: “Yes, we can! Yes, we can! Yes, we can!”

“Here we go,” Obama replied. “All right — guys, guys, all right. I agree, I agree.”

A little later, Obama pleaded for political solidarity on gay rights and other issues.

“When you’ve got an ally like Barbara Boxer and you’ve got an ally like me who are standing for the same thing, then you don’t know exactly why you’ve got to holler, because we already hear you, all right?,” Obama said to applause.

The problem is, of course, that the President does not appear to hear our community already. And his response at the fundraiser suggests that he is unaware – or unconcerned – about the growing discontent that our community feels from having our issues delayed or dismissed.

We are annoyed that this administration seems incapable of providing a clear, consistent answer about how and when DADT will be overturned. Instead, we hear promises offset by stalling, the Presidents say one thing only to have the Department of Justice say exactly the opposite. We have military leaders contradicting each other in front of Congress and the White House sits silently while our allies in the House and Senate beg him to lend his voice to the cause.

All of this adds to a creeping supposition that this President has little to no intention on capitalizing on a Democrat control of the legislature to fulfill his promises. It feels more and more likely that November will come without action and Republican successes will be used as an excuse to continued institutionalized discrimination for another decade.

President Obama said at one point that the hecklers should go holler at the people who disagree with them. I’m not sure they weren’t doing just that.


April 20th, 2010

They should have shouted something about not needing a friggin’ one year study on this.


April 20th, 2010

When the crowd was chanting “Yes we can!” the protesters should have retorted with “WHEN???”. This kind of protest by civilians I could support.


April 20th, 2010

I only wish it were true that Obama, and other American Presidents, ignored your “community.” That way, the US military would still have the sensible policy it did before “don’t ask, don’t tell” was introduced – a complete ban on homosexuals, open or otherwise.

Unfortunately, it’s likely that Obama will eventually permit homosexuals to serve openly. Too bad the Republicans don’t have enough courage or willingness to stand on principle to support a return to a total ban on homosexuals.


April 20th, 2010

Before the DADT was put into effect there were still gays in the service.
I know for sure cause I was one of them.
I was in in 1965 to 1968. We are going to be there whether you straight people want us there or not.
maybe there should be a total ban on homophobs from serving. Then you would need some of the gays.
The Republicans are the ones that forced the DADT into effect to start with!

Emily K

April 20th, 2010

Go back to the baths, Quo. Think about how “bad” homos are while you’re experiencing how “good” they make you feel.


April 20th, 2010

Why do you even care about what the U.S. military does as a South African?


April 20th, 2010


Yes, unfortunately it may be possible to keep homosexuals out of the military entirely. But, since they’re a potentially disruptive element, the military should definitely do everything it can to exclude them.

People who want to join should be asked what their sexual preference is, and if the answer is anything other than “heterosexual”, they should not be permitted in. I totally support the military’s investigation of its soldiers’ private lives to weed out homosexuals.


I’m not a South African. I care what the U.S. military does because it’s an important institution that affects other countries as well as the U.S.


April 20th, 2010

Considering over 20 other militaries have beaten us to the change that boat has long past sailed.


April 20th, 2010


They’ll regret the change eventually. Militaries need to be intolerant.

(I was trying to say “impossible” in my last post, not “possible” – typo trouble again).


April 21st, 2010

“Militaries need to be intolerant.”

Yes. Let’s go back to the days of the all-white, all-male military. And cheer them on for killing all those dirty sand people.

You really are repulsive.

Priya Lynn

April 21st, 2010

Quo whines when people call him a troll yet his comments here serve no pupose other than to annoy people – he is nothing but a troll.


April 22nd, 2010

Quo is a complete troll, stop feeding him.

In any case, about the post: Obama is a liar, but more importantly HRC are traitors to their blood. There needs to be some campaign against them, to make people aware of what they’re doing so they stop donating.

I hope there’s a special place in hell for traitors.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.