DADT Protesters Released, Trial Date Set

Jim Burroway

April 22nd, 2010

The six protesters against “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” who handcuffed themselves to the White House fence yesterday were released from jail. All six were charged with the misdemeanor of refusing to obey a policy order. Army Lt. Dan Choi and veteran Capt. Jim Pietrangelo pleaded not guilty before D.C. Superior Court Judge Richard Ringell. He combined the latest cases with the earlier cases for Choi  and Pietrangelo, and set a new trial date of July 14.

The other four — Navy Petty Officers Larry Whitt and Autumn Sandeen, Air Force Cadet Mara Boyd, and Marine Corps Corporal Evelyn Thomas — accepted a post-and-forfeit offer of a $100 fine in exchange for ending the case. Choi and Pietrangelo were also offered the same deal but declined.

All six protesters are under court order to stay away from the streets surrounding the White House. For the four who accepted the post-and-forfeit offer, the order is in effect only until they pay the fine, which is due within a month. For Choi and Pietrangelo, it appears that the court order will remain in effect until their trial date. The attorney for Choi and Pietrangelo argued that the order violates their First Amendment Rights, but the court ruled against their objections.

In related news, a spokesman for the US Parks Police admitted that the service “screwed up” when they turned away reporters during the protest. The spokesman called the incident “embarrassing” and blamed it on a “rookie amateur error.” He denied that the Secret Service or the White House had anything to do with the push to move reporters out of view of the protest.

Bubba C

April 23rd, 2010

“He denied that the Secret Service or the White House had anything to do with the push to move reporters out of view of the protest.”

Yeah right, who the hell do they think they’re foolin’?!

Jason D

April 23rd, 2010

Bubba, do you really think everyone in DC sits around waiting for the President to tell them what to do?

I’m not defending him, so much as pointing out that the president has a lot on his plate without micromanaging DC as well.

customartist

April 24th, 2010

There are a Multitude of unanswered questions:

Who was that “Rookie Cop” that made the initial decision? Who? We deserve to have this information.

Is this person Still Making Decisions about the Security of the Most Important National Park in America??? We need to know?

Who Was the “High Ranking Official” who “recognized the problem”?

Why was the Secret Service “assisting” in something that was non-threatening and peaceful? Who made THAT decision??

Why did the Judge deny Choi and Pietrangelo the right to “be” in the streets around the White House? Now the Judge is involved.

Not accounting for the Five Against the Fence, Weren’t the Rights of the Tourists and Members of the Media’s Rights denied?…

And furthermore, weren’t My (and your) rights denied as I depend upon the Media to tell me what is going on around the White House?

What Remedial Actions will be taken on this issue. The Five were Arrested, but what about the Rights of all of the other peaceful Tourists and Media???

Will there be a suit against the Park Police for making an admitted “Rookie Mistake”?…

And against the Secret Service for “assisting” in this “rookie error”?

Are the Park Police lieing to protect the Secret Service ultimately protecting the President?

This all smells fishy to me.

Clearly there was no threat against the President, no Bomb Threat, no Terrorist Threat, no Rioting, no Gun Weilding, no Destruction of Property, no Bonfires, etc., etc., etc…….Nothing but Peaceful Demonstration.

The Freedom of the Media is Gone!

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Ex-Pope Benedict Took On The Gay Lobby And Won, Says Ex-Pope Benedict

North Carolina Lawmakers Plot Raid Of Disaster Relief Fund to Defend HB 2

Federal Judge: Mississippi's Right-To-Discriminate Law Was Designed "To Put LGBT Citizens Back In Their Place"

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1943: Gay Resistance Fighters Shot By Nazis

Today In History, 1969: DC Appeals Court Rules Against Civil Service Commission's Gay Employment Ban

Today In History, 1982: Larry Craig Preemptively Denies Connection to Gay Page Sex Scandal

Born On This Day, 1925: Farley Granger

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.