McCollum Overruled His Own Staff to Hire Rekers for Florida Case

Jim Burroway

June 4th, 2010

Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, who is now a GOP candidate running for Florida’s governorship, overruled his own main attorney defending the state’s gay adoption ban, and hired the now disgraced anti-gay activists George Rekers for $120,693, according to new information published in today’s Miami Herald Tribune.

The e-mails released Thursday show that an attorney in McCollum’s own office warned against hiring Rekers, whose testimony had been deemed suspect in an earlier Arkansas lawsuit that challenged a ban on placing foster children in homes with gay parents. Assistant Attorney General Valerie Martin wrote in a July 2007 e-mail that after talking to Arkansas officials and reviewing the background of the former University of South Carolina professor that she would “recommend NOT using him.”

E-mails also show that during a conference call Martin — who said the state considered more than 30 possible expert witnesses — was ordered to hire Rekers “against my strong cautions.”

Records show that the Department of Children and Families, which brought in the Attorney General’s office to defend the lawsuit, didn’t want to hire Rekers as an expert witness in the lawsuit because he wanted to charge $300 an hour. DCF only agreed to his hiring based on McCollum’s strong recommendations.

The noted anti-gay activist and “expert” witness was later discovered returning from a European vacation with a male escort hired from Rekers claims he hired Jo-Vanni Roman to help him “lift his luggage.”

Priya Lynn

June 4th, 2010

I wonder why Mccollum was so keen on hiring Rekers given that he had reason to believe Rekers’ testimony would be counterproductive to the anti-gay cause?

Lindoro Almaviva

June 4th, 2010

You know Priya, that is a very good question. Could it be his way of sabbotaging the defence or could it be that the guy is just a bumbling idiot who could not recognize bias because his own had him blind?


June 4th, 2010

Priya said: “I wonder why Mccollum was so keen on hiring Rekers given that he had reason to believe Rekers’ testimony would be counterproductive to the anti-gay cause?”

NOTHING is counter-productive to the anti-gay cause in Florida. We call Florida the “Sunshine Hate” because of the discrimination aganst gay people here. From adoption to hospital visitation to food stamps to domestic partnerships to ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING GAY, Florida leads the way in state-endorsed hatred and discrimination.

Priya Lynn

June 4th, 2010

“NOTHING is counter-productive to the anti-gay cause in Florida.”.

Uhhh…I’m not buying that.

Regan DuCasse

June 4th, 2010

You beat me to it, Priya Lynn. McCollum, regardless of the high cost, and dubious veracity of what Rekers could offer, you’d think that McCollum would just bag the idea and move on to something else.

To echo other points here, no expense was spared because it was other people’s money, and no sacrifice was too great as long as it’s gay people and their lives that are sacrificed.

The war on gay people has no boundaries. It’s worth exploiting public funds (which gay Floridians contribute to, big time), it’s worth the risk of revealing scandalous issues like Rekers and throwing him to the wolves as (the reason why gay people can’t be trusted).

The real shame is all this expense, risk of exposure and all other manner of costs waging a war on gay people, doesn’t save children, marriage or get a very serious problem solved in FL.
Like, having homes for children in need.
It’s not like McCollum has any in HIS house.

I don’t think I’ve seen anything so wasteful, arrogant and cynical as this folly against gay people.

Were such energy directed elsewhere and the agenda of engaging gay people as allies to solve problems were involved, a lot more problems WOULD be solved.

Is there a name for such obsession that wastes so much and does nothing good?
I’d like to hear it.

And this pustule wants to RUN the state?!
Who does he think he is that he should?


June 4th, 2010

Kinda old but I didn’t see it mentioned..

Bill McCollum’s gay senior adviser adopted children

WTF is wrong with both of these guys..


June 4th, 2010

“Uhhh…I’m not buying that.”

Uhhh…. that’s because you don’t live in South Florida.

Do you really think that we haven’t fought back against the anti-gay right wingers here? Of course we have. What have we accomplished? Not much of a damn thing, even though 2 days in a row don’t go by without me getting solicitations from a dozen FLA organizations “fighting anti-gay discrimination.”

McCullom’s attitude is typical of Floridians.

btw, this is my all-time favorite dirty- politics-as-usual from Florida anti-gays:

Nice mullet, huh?


June 5th, 2010

Where is Rekers these days. Is he still denying everything? Meanwhile, Ted Haggard is going to establish a new church.

Priya Lynn

June 5th, 2010

Candace losing the case on gay adoption was a setback to the anti-gay cause in Florida. A civil union law would be a setback to the anti-gay cause in Florida. The idea that nothing in Florida would be a setback to the anti-gay cause is nonsense.


June 5th, 2010

This is what I said: NOTHING is counter-productive to the anti-gay cause in Florida.

You said that’s nonsense because McCollum lost the adoption case.

Oh my, they lost the case on adoption. How many times is it now? Twice? Three times? And are gays allowed to adopt in Florida? Why no, they’re not.

The reality is that h8ters continue to win every contest on gay rights in Florida. Oh, every now and then some county passes a non-discrimination ordinance. Key West treats gays decently. It’s better than nothing.

Why are the campaigns so unequal? Because they’re so smart and strong and god is on their side and they have the strength of ten because their hearts are pure? Hell, no. It’s because most gay people here don’t give a rat’s ass about politics.

I spent WEEKS talking to gays and lesbians before the vote 2 years ago that banned civil unions in Florida. I stressed how important it was to vote, begged people to vote, and stood in line myself for over 4 hours to cast a vote. Not a ONE of the gay people I spoke to, voted. NONE of them. They were just too tired to stand in those long lines. That’s what they told me, they didn’t want to stand in line. And the church devils passed a proposition that not only enforces the state DOMA, it bans civil unions and domestic partnerships too. And my wonderful black neighbors and friends took the opportunity to wave to me and my partner –as we stood in line beside them, electing our first black President– and went inside to vote against gay rights, to keep me a second-class citizen. Thanks a bunch for that.

It’s the perfect storm: ignorant fundie homophobes throw themselves into every campaign and the gay people talk a lot of talk but that’s about as far as it goes. Feh.

Priya Lynn

June 6th, 2010

Candace you said nothing is counterproductive to the anti-gay cause in Florida – that’s nonsense.

When gays are allowed to adopt that will be counter-productive to the anti-gay cause. If a civil union law were to be passed that would be counter-productive to the anti-gay cause. Any advancement for gays in Florida would be counter-productive to the anti-gay cause. The idea that nothing is counterproductive to the anti-gay cause is obviously nonsense.


June 6th, 2010

Good god, priya…. “that will be” and “is” are two different things.

Feel free to continue to tell me how great it will be for the gay cause when all those future-tense things happen and I’ll continue to tell you how sh*tty it is for the gays who live here NOW.

“will be”

Try hard to get this concept, k?

Priya Lynn

June 7th, 2010

Candace in your context there is no distinction between nothing is counterproductive and nothing will be counterproductive. If you had said nothing has been counterproductive then you might have had a point. As it is the way you said it its implicit that nothing can be counterproductive to the anti-gay cause in Florida and that is nonsense.


August 10th, 2010

Looks like he’s doubling down on his idiocy.

McCollum: Ban gays from being foster parents

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.