No change to blood ban

Timothy Kincaid

June 11th, 2010

The Health and Human Services Advisory Committee on Blood Safety and Availability has voted 9-6 to keep a lifelong ban on any man who has had even one sexual encounter with anther man in the past thirty-three years. Cuz their skurrred of the gay.

There is no medical reason for the ban as it is. All of the blood agencies favor changing the ban. Most other industrial nations do not have a life time ban.

But none of that matters. Because the committee members were not voting based on science, experience or logic.

Derrick

June 11th, 2010

As soon as they change their ridiculous rules, they are welcome to have a pint of my O negative (universal donor) blood every 8 weeks. Until then, I guess I will just keep it all to myself.

Mark F.

June 11th, 2010

Considering that the HIV tests are already really accurate, it seems to me that a man who has tested HIV negative 3-6 months ago and has not had sex with another man since then should be allowed to donate blood.

This action may prevent one person in 10 million from getting AIDS at the expense of significantly reducing the amount of blood donated.

It should be noted that the government was reluctant to require any screening of blood in the early years of the epidemic (with the complicity of the blood banks and with disasterous consequences), so that may be the reason for super caution at this point, not homophobia.

paul j stein

June 11th, 2010

Lawyers !

penguinsaur

June 12th, 2010

If I ever decide to give blood I’m lying on every single question they ask me.

Troy

June 12th, 2010

You could always lie and donate blood if you’re so altruistic about your fellow humans. Me? I don’t give a crap.

Mark F.

June 13th, 2010

“If I ever decide to give blood I’m lying on every single question they ask me.”

I actually think that’s fine if you’ve had an HIV test 3-6 months ago that was negative and have done nothing to expose yourself to HIV in the meantime.

Burr

June 13th, 2010

I wouldn’t suggest lying on every single question, that would get you disqualified, too. Are you going to say you got a tattoo or piercing or went to a malarial area when you didn’t? ;)

But seriously, most of the other questions have at least some value (even if they test for most of it anyway). Don’t sabotage the system. If you know for sure that you’re clean, then I suppose that isn’t too bad, but otherwise I suggest knowing your status first. This is people’s lives we’re talking about.

TonyJazz

June 14th, 2010

Same as Derrick, I’m a ‘universal donor’ who used to donate blood regularly and happen to be HIV negative.

Their foolish loss (and the world’s)…

CPT_Doom

June 15th, 2010

Remember, a straight man can have a drug-fueled orgy with 10 HIV+ female prositutes and 366 days later can give blood. If you got a hand job from your best friend in 1979 you are barred for life (since the FDA does not define “sex” in its lifetime ban on gay men). That seems like sound science to me – not!

It goes farther than the blood ban, though. Because of these rules, gay men are barred from being organ donors as well. So if my sister needs a kidney or one of my nephews needs my bone marrow, I am barred from even offering to help, no matter what my “lifestyle” is really like – and, as I noted when I declined the free HIV testing at Pride last weekend, you have to be having sex to catch an STD, and I’m just not that slutty.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.