NOM Commits Sodomy
The Daily Agenda for Saturday, February 11
The Daily Agenda for Friday, February 10
Again anti-gays blindly and gleefully shoot themselves in the foot
Rep. Walsh leads with her heart
Advocate, WaPo, AP Get it Wrong On Anti-Homosexuality Bill
Uganda Executive, Parliament Tussle Over Anti-Homosexuality BIll
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, February 9
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 450 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
Posts 
Posts via daily email:
As part of the Military’s “review” of the anti-gay Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, military officers have encouraged soldiers to share their concerns in group settings. But few concerns about gay soldiers have seemed to be paramount on the minds of the troops. So the Pentagon is sending email invitations for service members to privately provide their opinions. (CNN)
Anonymous
July 7th, 2010 | LINK
Interestly enough, shower facilities in a war zone are not open bay. Yes, there are open changing areas, but only until you step into individual curtained shower stalls. Some (very few) will step into the shower with their underwear or PT shorts on and remove them before turning on the shower water. In most cases there is as much privacy as a person wants. This is consistent throughout the services. In garrison there is even more privacy. For example many gyms have an individual changing stall leading directly into the individual shower.
Sean
July 7th, 2010 | LINK
Interestingly, CNN specifically edited out the part where Drew Griffin asks incredulously why the troops need to be surveyed at all. Then Barbara Starr makes some desperate arguments and seems almost obligated to defend the survey. The part that CNN cut out is from 2:26-4:39 here: http://tinyurl.com/22sqaf9
Stefano A
July 7th, 2010 | LINK
Another disturbing factor about the surveys that were emailed as that American Forces Press Service reported surveys were also sent to the married spouses of servicemembers, which will inevitably skew results when there is no way to obtain an equivalent survey of the spouses of gay servicemembers or their families.
Richard Rush
July 7th, 2010 | LINK
Is it just me, or is there a major disconnect here?
On the one hand we are told that our military is the greatest fighting force the world has ever seen, staffed with tough courageous soldiers willingly facing the risk of losing their limbs and/or their lives.
Then, on the other hand, the soldiers are treated as though they may be too fragile, tender, and delicate to endure the unspeakable risks of being in a shower room with a known homosexual. What exactly are those risks? It seems to me that the only one at risk here is the known homosexual.
So which is it?
Edwin
July 7th, 2010 | LINK
This whole email thing is a lot of bunk. When I was in the service we all showered in an open shower. All the guys more than likely showered the same way when they had gym class in school.
These emails are so the big sh**s in (w)ashington can make it look like the soliders are afraid of the openly gay men that should have the same rights of the other men. As far as sending the emails to the spouces that shouldn’t happen. That is some more homophobic crap that (w)ashington big shots think the public needs to hear so they can get their way of not changing DADT. If Obama was good to his word he would just have changed it.. But he just used our vote to get in office.
Then he has f***ed this country up big time. This country will never be in the black on the books again. Nothing like printing money on paper that has no backing with gold like it used to have.
cd
July 7th, 2010 | LINK
They’re fishing rather desperately, no?
andrew
July 8th, 2010 | LINK
Folks, just to make a point here — we had co-ed showers at university. They weren’t open bay, but yes, the person in the next stall could be anyone of either gender. Typical of showers like this (and I’ve seen this at military installations), there’s often a 2-chambered “shower” — dry changing at the front, wet shower at the back, all curtained. This makes sense, as having “sexed” shower areas means redundant equipment and facilities, and, obviously, encourages the development of delicate sensibilities and an expectation of privacy, which, basically, doesn’t exist in the military.
Seriously, shouldn’t the brass, the politicians, and the talking heads give our men and women a little more credit? They’re making them sound like a bunch of sissies !!
Rob
July 8th, 2010 | LINK
Did the Pentagon asked soldiers’ opinions concerning racial integration or women in the military? Anyway the US armed forces aren’t #1 in quality if they can’t end this crap.
MJC
July 8th, 2010 | LINK
That is nauseating and I echo many of the sentiments expressed here. It’s clearly the military brass digging in their heels. Spouses should have nothing to do with this…and by the way, many of these same people (the brass) will rush to claim that the military is “different” and “NOT a democracy” (see the comments re women and blacks, above). When DADT was passed, many of the same tactics were used—as reported in _Courage Under Fire_.
Leave A Comment