July 30th, 2010
Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R) says he wants to find common ground with Log Cabin Republicans and will “drop by” the group’s political action committee reception before a September fundraiser in Washington, D.C.:
“Some things we won’t agree on,” Cornyn, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said. “But I think it’s always better to talk and then try find those things we can agree on rather than just assume there’s no common ground whatsoever.”
Cornyn said same-sex marriage is “absolutely” one of those things he and LCR members don’t agree on, but he’s happy to talk to them.
“I don’t want people to misunderstand and think that I don’t respect the dignity of every human being regardless of sexual orientation,” Cornyn said.
In that vein, he thought attending the fundraising event was something he should do, he said.
John Wright at The Dallas Voice reminds us that we shouldn’t expect too much from the exchange:
We’re sure some will try to argue this is a sign of progress, but we mustn’t forget Cornyn’s strong support for a federal marriage amendment, his vote against hate crimes last year, his stated opposition to DADT repeal, and his all-but-certain vote against ENDA if it ever reaches the Senate floor. Cornyn has received a zero on every Human Rights Campaign Congressional Scorecard since he took office.
Wright sees this latest development as “nothing more than pandering for votes and money from gay Republicans across the country.” I would tend to agree, since there seems to be no hint of concession on any of the issues that directly concern LGBT people. Cornyn is chair of the GOP’s Senate campaign committee.
It was during the 2004 debate over the Federal Marriage Amendment that Cornyn’s famous “Box Turtle” quote entered the lexicon. A prepared draft of the speech he was to give to the Heritage Foundation on his support for the proposed amendment contained the line:
It does not affect your daily life very much if your neighbor marries a box turtle. But that does not mean it is right… Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife.
When he actually gave the speech, he skipped the line. But the Washington Post, working on the prepared draft released by Cornyn’s office, published the statement as provided. In the ensuing outcry over the comparison between gays and box turtles, Cornyn protested that he didn’t actually say the lines that his office had been released to news media. The Post later published a clarification.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Timothy Kincaid
July 30th, 2010
I disagree. I think that this statement misunderstands both gay Republicans and conservative politicians. This is not pandering, it’s something else entirely – and while it will not change votes, it is TREMENDOUSLY important. I’ll follow up later when I have more time.
Jack
July 30th, 2010
I agree with Mr Kincaid. I think this is a huge development, especially since Cornyn is announcing publicly that he plans/wants to meet with LCR. (He could of course have met them “off the record”.)
Will the meeting change votes or planks in the GOP platform? In and of itself, almost certainly not. But Cornyn can see very well which way the wind is blowing and it’s not the direction he (and today’s GOP) came from.
customartist
July 30th, 2010
It MEANS that Cornyn is trying to do his job: Raize funds for the GOP. He has absolutely zero inclination toward removing DADT, DOMA, nor toward implementing ENDA; ZERO!, which is exactly what the rest of the GOP will do with your money if you are dumb enough to be fooled by this rhetoric. That’s what it is > Worthless B.S.
“We respect you (now at election time) but if you think for one skinny moment that we will ever make any effort what so ever to remove the opressive laws that keep you in a lesser socio-economic level than we’uns, well, just send us your money!”
customartist
July 30th, 2010
The best predictor of future behavior is previous behavior. Hmmm???
Priya Lynn
July 30th, 2010
And people criticize Democrat supporting gays for giving support and getting nothing in return.
Ray
July 30th, 2010
It’s pandering. Mary Bono Mack (R) Palm Springs, does this same in her district. She meets with LCR or GOProud, knocks out a press release about it and the right-wing newspaper publishes it. She told us she would rely on guidance from military leaders on DADT and I sent her a list of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and Secretaries of Defense (both present and previous) who supported the elimination of DADT. The majority of both groups supported eliminating it. When the vote on the Appropriations Bill came up, Bono Mack vote (wait for it) “Nay”. She’s a phony. Guess what? GOProud gave her their endorsement.
cedlitz
July 30th, 2010
remember the Bush definition of bi-partisan-ism? It was “Hey you; come over here.”
Talk AT does not equal ‘talk to’ does not equal talk with’.
Leave A Comment