Report: Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Bill To Be Discussed In Parliament Next Week
The Definition of Megalomania
Ohio Teen Speaks About Bullying
The Daily Agenda for Friday, February 3
NOM Lies to the Media
Rolling Stone takes on Anoka-Hennepin
NJ Senate Panel Approves Marriage Equality Bill
Christie to Republicans: put marriage on the ballot, the people will vote for it
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapist try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 450 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Bruno
August 16th, 2010 | LINK
The Article III standing question seems to be a serious one. Overall, this was what I expected to happen.
Lindoro Almaviva
August 16th, 2010 | LINK
well, the appeal has not been granted, it seems that the court wants to hear from the proponents on how and why should they not be laughed off the court.
Am I not reading this well?
Timothy Kincaid
August 16th, 2010 | LINK
The burden of proof is on ADF for “why their appeal should not be dismissed for lack of standing.”
Kate
August 16th, 2010 | LINK
It seems to me strangely ironic, and deeply frustrating, that a fight over the right to love another person should be waged with such dry rhetoric and exacting legal terminology. Did I miss something, or is there no real reason given for the decision to grant the stay? My heart hurts to see this; I want to know why they can hide behind arcane legalese to deny two people the right to celebrate love.
Jake
August 16th, 2010 | LINK
No this isn’t a partial victory, it’s a complete disaster. The only possibly good thing about it is that they’ve expedited the schedule.
Granting the stay: Bad news for at least 4 more months.
Questioning the standing of the only people appealing this: Worse news. If the 9th circuit refuses to hear this because they lack standing, then the ruling only applies in California and never makes it to SCOTUS.
What would have been great news is denying the stay and saying yeah you’ve got standing. Then people who wanted to get married would have 4 months (at least) to get their acts together, and the case would likely be decided in our favor and apply to every Pacific State (and AZ, NV, MT, and ID). SCOTUS isn’t as friendly of territory but even if did get eventually shot down there, 9 states would have marriage equality for some period of time.
Michael
August 16th, 2010 | LINK
Jake,
First, take a deep breath.
Second, these are important, precedent setting decisions. Everyone involved in these decisions is making every effort to ensure that every “i” is dotted and every “t” crossed to ensure that no claims of “bias” can be raised, and that their decisions are unassailable. They are well aware that their’s is not the final say, and any decision reached by the 9th Circuit Court will be carefully scrutinized and reviewed by the press, the world and ultimately, the SCOTUS. They are covering their asses.
Even the public is now realizing that (in spite of all the inflammatory rhetoric) this is a basic issue of civil rights. The fundamental issue of the 14th amendment will prevail.
cd
August 16th, 2010 | LINK
Well, the silver lining is that a referendum to restore SSM legality in November 2012 will likely pass. That would make the lawsuit moot.
Coxygru
August 17th, 2010 | LINK
Sua sponte! The court wrote it was taking this case “sua sponte” – on its own initiative – since, as it states, Prop8 backers clearly have no standing to make this appeal.
Prup (aka Jim Benton
August 17th, 2010 | LINK
One point that no one seems to be making is that, by waiting until December, the Court is keeping a mid-October ruling from energizing Republican voters, not just in CA, but everywhere. Doubt if it was their intention, but it is a pleasant side effect.
Leave A Comment