Mexico’s Catholic Church threatens war

Timothy Kincaid

August 20th, 2010

You can’t always trust what you read on the often-nutty Catholic news source LifeSiteNews, but considering the wackadoodle craziness we’ve been hearing from the Catholic hierarchy in Mexico lately, it’s hard to put anything beyond them.

As we told you, Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iniguez of Guadalajara accused the mayor of Mexico City of bribing the nation’s Supreme Court to find that Mexico City’s marriage equality law did not violate the constitution. And he says he has proof.

Mayor Marcelo Ebrard filed a defamation suit against Iniguez. And it is in that context that LifeSiteNews tells us:

The spokesman for the Archdiocese of Mexico City, Hugo Valdemar, is coming out swinging against the socialist political establishment, which is threatening him, the city’s cardinal archbishop and the cardinal archbishop of Guadalajara, with punitive measures following comments condemning the city’s new pro-abortion and gay “marriage” legislation.

Denouncing the “new religious persecution” begun by Mexico City Chief of Government Marcelo Ebrard, which is motivated by “intolerance, hatred, and viscerality,” Valdemar warned that the actions of the mayor could “unleash a war in the country.”

If, indeed, the Church is declaring Holy War on the government, then this is actually becoming serious.

John in the Bay Area

August 20th, 2010

I guess the Church hasn’t noticed the war that is already going on in their country, on their streets, taking the lives of many of their fellow citizens.

So, they are calling for more violence in a country already racked by epidemic violence?

B John

August 20th, 2010

The Mayor is doing exactly the right thing by taking them to court. I’ve started to wonder why a group of gay people couldn’t take some of the politicians to court for slander for some of the things they say.

Orrin Hatch said that “gay people don’t tithe, their religion is politics.” It’s not true about me, and it harms me in my community, so why can’t I sue him for slander?

I am seriously trying research the possibility.

Lindoro Almaviva

August 20th, 2010

Queen please. War? If that was the case:

1. anyone know how is the church going to defend itself? After all, they do not have an army.

2. What is going to happen after the state gives them a pounding that will be remembered for the next 100 years?

Apparently there are some elements on the church that think that they still have the temporal powers the church enjoyed 500 years ago.

If i was the President, I would tell them all “Bring it on, and be prepared for the consequences.”

I am going to quote Pat Robertson here: If they are claiming that we are after them, then we might just go ahead and do it; so they KNOW without a shadow of a doubt, how it looks and what it feels like. That way all these bitching, complaining and grand standing will end once and for all.


August 20th, 2010

Strip them of their assets if they don’t keep to the law.

Ben in Oakland

August 20th, 2010

Does he really think that the country, declining to truly go to war against the drug cartels that are truly destroying it, is suddenly going to get up in arms?

And do…what?

Over two guys marrying each other.

It will be ineresting to see how this plays out. I’d love to hear the motive for a politician to bribe the supreme court.

I truly hope that the church has over-reached itself on this one. I’m hoping that there will be popcorn.

L. Junius Brutus

August 21st, 2010

No, they just wan to inflict as much political damage as possible on the mayor. Just look at the article. No mention of bribery. They are compounding their lie about bribery by claiming that the libel proceedings are actually “religious persecution” and that they are really about the comments they made about marriage and abortion.


August 21st, 2010

So the cardinal mouthed off. The mayor would have done well to just blow it off and let the gays celebrate their new equality, and let the news sink in gently with the straight community.

Of course I don’t know – and I suspect the writer of this article doesn’t know either – all the behind-the-scenes talk and the history of the relationship of church and government down there.

But from this distance it sounds like a schoolyard brawl that is totally unnecessary and will do nobody any good whatsoever.

“Mom! He called me a dirty name!”

Ya know, guys?

John Graykoski

August 21st, 2010

Interesting indeed…
After the Mexican revolution, the Church was strictly repressed, priests and nuns were not allowed to wear clerical garb in public. This was because the Church, as it frequently does in history, stood with the powerful, the rich. Clearly, the Roman Church yearns for the old days of priviledge when they stood at the right hand of the King.
The efforts of John Paul and now Benedict to return to a Church controlled by a few secretive men has been largely successful. And sadly, unless the Holy Spirit can conjure up a tornadic wind of change, the placement of bishops throughout the world who support this mindset will ensure the doctrinaire alighnment of the Church with the rich and powerful of the world for many years. This of course means enforcement of rigid “morality” at the sake of justice.

John Doucette

August 21st, 2010

Hey, the bishop started this, not the mayor. All the mayor did was respond.
Also, what is Rome doing about this? Isn’t Rome supposed to be in charge of its bishops?


August 21st, 2010

During the Middle Ages, countries that got into pissing matches with the Church could find themselves under interdict. No sacraments were performed–NONE–in such countries. No baptisms, no confessions, no last rites, no marriages. No exceptions. The strategy was to scare the population with threats of hellfire and damnation (since the Church and its sacraments stood between you and hell, and without them…) until one way or another–political pressure, civil war, what have you–the countries’ leaders bowed to the Church.

The Church is an institution very, very slow to change.


August 21st, 2010

It’s past time to strip churches of their special status.


August 21st, 2010

Too bad the drug cartel nightmare that’s reeking havoc across the country hasn’t drawn as much passion or concern from the unholy Roman empirialists.


August 21st, 2010

In regards to war, it wouldn’t be the first time that the catholic church waged war against Mexico and all the other countries south of the border littering each town with a cathedral right in the middle so all could remember the hate, murder and abuse they brought while attempting to remove any sign of a previous culture or people in the name of God.

Lynn David

August 21st, 2010

But not caring enough to go to war over the drug trade in Mexico…. maybe the Catholic Church in Mexico is trading in narcotics?


August 21st, 2010

Sandoval is really starting to remind me of Orly Taitz. Maybe they can team up.


August 22nd, 2010

In 1921, the Catholic Church did declare war upon the Mexican government and incited a multiple years long uprising that killed tens of thousands.

Some Catholic writers have compared the Alcalde of Mexico City with Franco and Pinochet; odd given that the Church supported the bloody uprisings against democratically elected governments that swept these mass murderers into power.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.