Sen. Collins: “I Cannot Vote to Proceed”

Jim Burroway

September 21st, 2010

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s insistence on refusing to allow votes on amendments to the Defense Authorization Bill is having the feared effect of driving previous Republican supporters of the bill from voting for cloture. This is Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) on the Senate floor:

They deserve to have a civil, fair and open debate on the Senate floor, and that is why I am so disappointed that rather than allowing full and open debate and the opportunity for amendments from both sides of the aisle, the majority leader apparently intends to shut down the debate and exclude Republicans from offering a number of amendments

…Now, Mr. President, I find myself on the horns of a dilemma. I support the provisions in this bill. I debated for them. I was the sole Republican in the committee that voted for the Lieberman-Levin language on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. I think it’s the right thing to do. I think it’s only fair, I think we should welcome the service of these individuals who are willing and capable of serving their country. But I cannot vote to proceed to this bill under a situation that is going to shut down the debate and preclude Republican amendments.”

According to reports, Reid once had her vote, but he lost it when he made the decision to refuse to allow votes on Republican amendments. Others on the fence were George Lemieux (R-FL), Olympia Snowe (R-ME);, Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Richard Lugar (R-IN), Judd Gregg (R-NH), Jim Webb (D-VA), George Voinovich (R-OH), and Kit Bond (R-MO). It is unclear what effect Collins’ decision will have on the others.

The White House has issued a public statement supporting the Defense Authorization bill, but the Washington Blade quotes Servicemembers Legal Defense Network’s Trevor Thomas: “We have not seen any signs that the White House has been whipping this vote in the last 48 hours.”

Tom in Lazybrook

September 21st, 2010

You know, the bill doesn’t die if cloture isnt reached. It dies if Reid withdraws the bill.

Chris McCoy

September 21st, 2010

Tom in Lazybrook wrote:

You know, the bill doesn’t die if cloture isnt reached.

The 2010 Legislative session ends today. Any bill that is not voted on today will not be passed untill next year, when the makeup of both Houses will be significantly different, and Mr Reid will most likely not be Senate Majority Leader.

So yes, if they do not reach cloture today, it is effectively dead.


September 21st, 2010

So, let’s cue up yet another pro-Republican talking point:

DADT repeal failed because Harry Reid is a hyperpartisan, power-drunk tyrant who wouldn’t let the oh-so-meek and selfless Republicans add a bunch of meaningless amendments to a bill.

Boo hoo. It’s all the Democrats’ fault. They should all just go back to Kenya.


September 21st, 2010

P.S. Mark Pryor has been “on the fence” on LGBT issues since at least 1996, when he “unexpectedly” missed the Senate vote that would have enacted ENDA.

He’s been on the fence so long that by now his you-know-whats have been totally destroyed.


September 21st, 2010

I don’t care about anything Republicans or Democrats do as long as they don’t tamper our rights.

So yeah, it IS Reid’s fault.

Mark F.

September 21st, 2010

Let the Senate vote on Republican amendments, Senator Reid, or you will get nothing. It’s called “compromise.”


September 21st, 2010

Don’t worry the Repubs love the gays. Things will be much better under the GOP for us, the world, the environment. It’s alll the Democrats fault… Don’t you see the rewriting of history (certainly on THIS site). Oh and Melhman is our friend, too.


September 21st, 2010

How does a Democratic White House whip Republican votes to end a filibuster?


September 21st, 2010

And cloture has failed.

Mark F.

September 21st, 2010

Cloture just failed 56-43


September 21st, 2010

Who abstained? That’s a total of 99

Patrick Garies

September 21st, 2010

@MJC: The nonvoter was Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

Scott P.

September 21st, 2010

Seems everyone’s ass is covered now.

I don’t think I can get enough energy up now to vote.

Tom in Lazybrook

September 21st, 2010

I think I’m gonna be just as much of a fierce advocate of the Dems as they are for me. No ENDA, no DADT repeal, no support from me. Its about results.

Stewart P.

September 21st, 2010

Tom in Lazybrook:

That sounds okay until you consider the repercussions. Stay home on election day and let the Republicans take over? I don’t think so.

Not only is that a bad idea for gays. That’s a bad idea for the environment, education, racial minorities, undocumented workers, workplace safety, etc.

Scott P.

September 21st, 2010

Better an honest enemy than a dishonest friend.


September 21st, 2010

I love the sentiment that says f- the Dems because they didn’t pass this bill. The Republicans are the ones who stopped it.

You realize that there are plenty of other Democratic priorities that weren’t accomplished, right? There are 50 million people in this country without health insurance and they have to wait until 2014 to buy crappy, overpriced health insurance.

DADT is grossly unfair, but it affects 48,000 people, and it will most likely be gone well before 2014 – unless the Republicans block it again.

So get some perspective. If this is enough to make you want a Republican congress, then you were probably going to start voting Republican as soon as the Democrats got you gay marriage.

And guys – stop appropriating issues like DADT and marriage that mostly affect lesbians as though you’re the one suffering the hurt.


September 22nd, 2010

“an honest enemy”…..Really now?

You’re referring to Republicans??

This is all a game. They all did what they had to do to retain their seats. I will campaign for and against those who voted for and against this Bill – that’s it.

Senators can now go back tot heir respective states and campaign that This Piece or That Piece of the Bill is why they voted for or against the Bill, as they think will get them re-elected.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.