Pop Quiz: Who Wrote this?

Jim Burroway

October 6th, 2010

The death of University student Tyler Clementi might have been properly mourned if it were not for the massive rallies and aggressive news coverage that altered the nature of the situation. The truth is that an 18-year-old boy killed himself – he was a student just like the rest of us, someone just trying to receive an education. Yet people’s relentless agendas took his death and turned it into a cause based on false pretenses.

Was it:

a) Focus On the Family’s Candi Cushman?
b) Amerians for Truth’s Peter LaBarbera?
c) Mission America’s Linda Harvey?
d) The editorial staff at the Rutgers University student newspaper, Daily Targum?


If you picked d), the Daily Targum, you’re correct.

When the student editors of the Rutgers University paper pondered the terrible tragedy of Tyler Clementi’s suicide after his roommate surreptitiously videoed him having sex with another man and broadcasted it on the Internet, they chose not to engage their readers in a broad discussion on respecting your peers, invasion of privacy, or valuing diversity.

Instead, they reached for exactly the same talking points being spouted by some of the most ardent elements of the anti-gay right who would rather see more LGBT youth commit suicide than actually coming to grips with the environments that foster these tragedies. Instead, we get some idiotic pablum about “a boy’s inability to deal with the hardships of life.”

There are many ways to respond to a tragedy. Corpse-kicking is perhaps the worst possible way. They may have well asked Linda Harvey to write a guest editorial for them. All Rutgers students should be ashamed of their paper. Deeply ashamed.

Ben Mathis

October 6th, 2010

The point being, even if it was completely unconnected (something that cannot be proven easily) it’s not like it would be a bad thing to gain more protection for GLBT youth who might commit suicide in this homophobic environment.

Why is it so important that everyone treat it as a totally random and unimportant issue that has no connection to gay bullying unless the writers are upset about something?

John in the Bay Area

October 6th, 2010

I guess he would have been properly mourned if nobody said anything about what happened, nobody did anything to hold his abusers accountable for their invasion of his privacy, nobody acknowledged that he was gay, and if nobody but his parents knew that he was dead.

Sounds like the Rutgers student editorial staff defines “properly mourned” the way most folks would define “swept under the rug.”

I do wonder what connections, if any, the editorial writers have to Wei and Razi.

AJD

October 6th, 2010

Fortunately, if you read the comments on the editorial, about 99.5% of them are negative, and most have some pretty choice words for the Daily Targum’s editorial staff.

What’s more is that the editorial was badly written. They even used “media” as a singular noun in the headline…

Jack

October 6th, 2010

What is going on in North Jersey? Two days, and two publications one would think would be sympathetic to gay issues totally throw us under the bus: the Jewish Standard and now the Rutgers student paper. Both commentaries are extremely offensive.

gar

October 6th, 2010

When my college paper did something boneheaded (printing the names of folks arrested in a campus tearoom — big no-no), I marched to the paper’s offices and raised hell. I did it alone, but I did it. I hope folks go to the Targum’s offices and engage in a stern dialog about why this editorial is really, really not OK.

Timothy Kincaid

October 6th, 2010

Homosexuality is not the only reason for which people kill themselves. In this case, it might have pushed Clementi over the edge, but the fact that he was gay should by no means turn his death into a march for safe spaces.

“It” in the highlighted portion is “Homosexuality”. Or: “Homosexuality may have pushed Clementi over the edge…”

These editors share the same values as Vox Day

Priya Lynn

October 6th, 2010

the fact that he was gay should by no means turn his death into a march for safe spaces.

I am totally mystified – why the hell not? What possible reason could any moral sane person have for opposing his death being a motivation to create safe places?

TampaZeke

October 6th, 2010

The Editor says, “Let us – family, friends and the University together – mourn for Clementi, and just for him, rather than using him as a martyr for a cause that has yet to be proven”, yet NOWHERE in his commentary did he indicate that he has spoken with a family member or friend of Tyler.

How infuriatingly insensitive, ignorant and offensive this trash is.

The editors, The Targum, Rutgers University, their students, alumni, faculty and staff should be utterly ashamed of this editorial.

Rob San Diego

October 6th, 2010

And here I chose “A”. Damn it, I thought I had chosen the right one. There wasn’t enough hate in it to be from LaBarbara.

Paul in Canada

October 6th, 2010

Priya, my reaction too! WTF???!!!! Why do people constantly want to dis-associate the ‘gay’ from these suicides?

Oh yeah, accountability and personal responsibility/culpability.

Damn.

anteros

October 6th, 2010

wow. i wonder what made me think highly of rutgers… it seems like a really dark place.

Priya Lynn

October 6th, 2010

I’m not following Paul, why would the desire for accountability and personal responsibility/culpability make one want to disassociate gayness from these suicides?

Penguinsaur

October 6th, 2010

Event A: Guy gets the fact that he’s gay broadcast to everyone he knows in the most explicit way possible.

Event B: Guy commits suicide.

It takes breathtaking levels of denial for someone to claim they don’t see the cause and effect at work here. Do they seriously think he shrugged off being outed and then jumped because he was getting bad grades or something?

Amicus

October 6th, 2010

What if he hadn’t taken his own life?

Suppose the headline news was ‘gay frosh’s sex tryst filmed twice and streamed on net by his roommate’?

Wouldn’t that kind of repeated, targeted, invasion of privacy have perked the ears of many, on campus and off?

Put another way, Tyler’s death is not the center of an ‘agenda’. It is Ravi’s actions, not Tyler’s, at the center of what is in question.

Amicus

October 6th, 2010

adding:

“Media exploitation” is off the mark, too, no?

Isn’t the tragedy for the community that they have to pay so high a price to get clear a focus on the problems, no matter what extent they were a trigger in Tyler’s untimely death?

I watched as one of our state Senators listened to a kid, right in front of him, tell him that he was being picked on because he had two mommies and he couldn’t tell the bullies that they were married, “just like everyone else’s parents”.

Instead of accepting the logical conclusion to redress that injustice, that cold-hearted Senator said, while right in front of that family, that he was against bullying and for people doing a better job understanding civil unions. Surely, he was intelligent enough to understand that neither were sufficient (or timely enough) to stop the harms.

The hostility is palpable, on display, and the kids eventually feel it and _everyone_ becomes a victim of homophobia, sometimes in high profile tragedy and sometimes in smaller ways.

TonyJazz

October 6th, 2010

While the newspaper editorial is shameful, don’t blame the rest of the student body.

Yes, a few students are this hateful towards us, but it does not reflect on the majority of the population….

I cannot believe Rutgers has students more bigotted than average….

Ryan

October 6th, 2010

If he had been killed by a drunk driver, MADD would be making speeches and protesting, if he were killed by an illegal immigrant, all of Fox News would be in an uproar, if he were killed by someone with an unlicensed handgun, the anti-NRA liberals would be making noise. This man was killed by anti-gay sentiment that pervades much of this country, but apparently it’s impolite to point that out.

Candace

October 6th, 2010

The fact that he was gay had absolutely nothing to do with him being outed by being secretly filmed while having gay sex while the filmer tweeted looklook, gay sex. Got it.

Who do I hold responsible for his death? NOM. Savage. Barber. La Barbera. The AFA. Exodus. Tony Perkins. God, they’ve probably had hard-ons for days.

customartist

October 7th, 2010

I think that Country Singer Shelly Wright made a very important point on Larry King Monday when she said that while she had been mostly undetected as gay until when she came out about a year and a half ago, that she HAD been bullied Since that time, and by adults no less.

The overall comment she made was that “There are Bullies in Government, there are Bullies in Society, and there are Bullies in Churches, etc.”

I thought that his was a perfectly accurate depiction of the current day situation.

JimInMa

October 7th, 2010

You forget that many of the kids writing for that paper are working toward a journalism major, and are probably hoping to be living in the NYC/NJ area after they graduate. Which means they’re looking for jobs at the ultra-conservative newspapers in that area. You can’t land one of those jobs without stomping on one minority group or another. I went to school at Rutgers. I still remember how things work in NJ.

customartist

October 7th, 2010

Well Jim,

I haven’t done much traveling in New Jersey, but the transplants relocating to the Myrtle Beach area from NY are certainly Of that particular mindset.

Your comments make things a bit clearer.

Everett

October 10th, 2010

Well if the student editors are anything my alma mater’s newspaper staff…then we just have to remember that these college students aren’t the brightest folks on campus and probably haven’t really learned to analyze, critically think, and appreciate nuances. It doesn’t excuse this dumb editorial, but let’s face it, some of the biggest morons in college are the ones writing crap for their college newspapers rather than studying in the library, working as a research assistant for a professor, interning off-campus, or taking graduate school courses.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1951: California Gay Bars Given Very Brief Reprieve

Today In History, 1965: Gay Rights Advocates Picket the State Department

Today In History, 1987: Arsonists Burn Florida Family Home of Three Brothers with AIDS

Born On This Day, 1825: Karl Heinrich Ulrichs

Born On this Day, 1921: Nancy Kulp

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 2006: NARTH Official Recommends Peer Shaming for Gender-Variant Elementary School Children

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.