The Daily Agenda for Thursday, May 23
It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Gay Couples Excluded from Immigration Bill Markup
How To Spot A Swivel-Eyed Loon
The Daily Agenda for Wednesday, May 22
House of Commons officially passes marriage equality
British Commons Approves Marriage Equality Bill
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Leonardo Ricardo
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
John McCain has stained himself with teapartylike sludge since meeting up with Sarah Palin…he´s been caught in a landslide of filth that he won´t ever be able to wipe clean away…once a heroic grown man who stood with his personal integrity he´s now sunk down by pandering to the lowest and most selfish of the bigoted low.
Mark F.
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
And with 2 more Republicans likely to be seated in the Senate in November, a filibuster will be hard to break–although Reid may decline to even bring the matter to the floor again. This proposed repeal may be dead for years.
Rob San Diego
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
It’s because of old fogies like McCain that the administration needs to not appeal the court decisions. JUST ACCEPT THE DECISION! Old farts like McCain will filibuster till the day they are un-elected.
Thomas
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
McBush is only parroting the views of ALL the other REPUBLICANS in the US Senate. That said, with our “fierce advocate” in the White House does any of this matter? Obama has shown without a doubt that he will do NOTHING of substance for the gay community. Thanks, in large part, for the continued cover that HRC has provided him to do NOTHING.
RWG
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
At the very least, if they’re going to filibuster, the Democratic Senate leadership should make them ACTUALLY take to the Senate floor to speak, not just accept a threat. Make them stand there and talk; they’ll soon give up and the vote can go forward.
Ryan
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
The “study” which will influence not one single vote, won’t be complete until the new Congress is sworn in, and Republicans won’t ever vote for repeal. So, it’s done. There will be no repeal at least until 2012, and only then if Obama is reelected and the Dems get huge majorities in both Houses again, which is pretty unlikely. Realistically, we’re looking at repeal around 2016 or 2020.
Ryan
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
RWG, actual filibustering (talking at the podium) doesn’t exist any more. It hasn’t for decades.
John in the Bay Area
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
I think that bringing back the physical filibuster (getting up and talking to death a bill) will have to be brought back in order to allow our political system to function again. This filibustering from the comfort of your bed is just plain criminal.
Frijondi
October 18th, 2010 | LINK
That “thorough and complete study” was done by the Navy in 1957. It’s called the Crittenden Report; perhaps McCain should read it.
DN
October 19th, 2010 | LINK
Ryan, I hate to say that I agree with your timeline. But I’m kinda a pessimist :)
Joe
October 19th, 2010 | LINK
Thanks Frijondi for the heads up on the “Crittendon Report”. Here is a link to a list of interesting docuements such as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell : A Costly and Wasteful Choice” –> http://www.au.af.mil/au/aul/school/asbc/haf.htm
Matt
October 19th, 2010 | LINK
McCain can rant and rave about filibustering all he wants. At this rate, there won’t be anything left for him TO filibuster.
Ed
October 20th, 2010 | LINK
McCain is just old politics!! He should get with the program or retire!!
Leave A Comment