Shirvell fired

Timothy Kincaid

November 8th, 2010

Having finally been determined to be too much of an embarrassment to work for the Michigan Attorney General’s office as an assistant DA (something I knew immediately), Andrew Shirvell has been fired by his boss (and onetime defender) Mike Cox. (Ann Arbor)

Shirvell was fired for using state resources for his campaign against University of Michigan student body President Chris Armstrong and for lying to investigators during his disciplinary hearing, Attorney General Mike Cox said in a statement.

That and making a fool of himself on television repeatedly.

Scott

November 8th, 2010

What’s sad is he’ll probably be hired by the Liberty Council and join Matt Barber as the next great martyr.

Scott P.

November 8th, 2010

I agree with Scott. This will probably make his career (until he’s caught in an airport men’s room).

Timothy Kincaid

November 8th, 2010

Scotts,

You’re probably right… but that’s a good thing. The more blithering idiots hired by Liberty Council, the better.

Eventually, their entire legal team will show up to court with big red noses all crammed together in a tiny car only to hop out and throw a bucket of confetti on the judge.

Richard W. Fitch

November 8th, 2010

Oh, Timothy! Where is the “LIKE” button when you need it??!!??

Scott P.

November 8th, 2010

Is the plural of Scott Scotts, or Scotti???

Regan DuCasse

November 8th, 2010

Nail, hit, hammer there Scott.

Let LC get all the nutcases they can. And perhaps they’ll look to SCOTUS, just like they actually ARE in the real world.

A bunch of incompetent, non credible, obsessed believers.
Who know nothing of the Constitution, nor care about it, unless it’s for their exclusive protection and manipulation.

Shirvell has this legacy to back himself up.
Hee hee, I’d pay to see HIM try and be before ANY court in the future.

Titus

November 9th, 2010

“The more blithering idiots hired by Liberty [Counsel], the better. Eventually, their entire legal team will show up to court with big red noses all crammed together in a tiny car only to hop out and throw a bucket of confetti on the judge.”

ROFL!

Aeval

November 9th, 2010

“A bunch of incompetent, non credible, obsessed believers.
Who know nothing of the Constitution, nor care about it, unless it’s for their exclusive protection and manipulation.”

So in other words they read the Constitution as they read the Bible?

BlackDog

November 9th, 2010

Honestly, I hate to say it but I’m still waiting to get my gaydar repaired from when I saw this idiot being interviewed on TV. I’ve never had an anti-gay person trip my gaydar as badly as he did.

Not only that, but he was basically stalking that college student. He could very well be charged and if convicted he could be disbarred depending on the exact charges.

“Eventually, their entire legal team will show up to court with big red noses all crammed together in a tiny car only to hop out and throw a bucket of confetti on the judge.”

Isn’t that what all the Amicus Briefs and filings RE: the Proposition 8 appeal were? I seem to remember someone saying basically that a bucket of confetti would be easier to read than some of those legal briefs.

BlackDog

November 9th, 2010

Oh by the way, Andrew Shirvell made me ashamed to admit I’m from Michigan for a while.

Priya Lynn

November 9th, 2010

Now that he’s lost his job I wonder if he feels his campaign against Chris Armstrong was worth it.

BlackDog

November 9th, 2010

No because he didn’t get that booty *cough cough* oops I mean convert that boy.

I really, really got a creepy stalker vibe off Shirvell, that and he struck me as very over-the-top feminine, which really just made him seem more creepy especially since in the interview he kept going on and on about Christianity vs. Teh Gay.

Dude’s got some issues, I hope he resolves them someday.

Paul in Canada

November 9th, 2010

I hope somebody he trusts offers/insists he get some counselling or this sap is going to go postal, especially if he’s disbarred.

B John

November 9th, 2010

Paul has it right. Armstrong withdrew his motion for a protective order a while back, but his attorney is doing him a grave disservice if she does not re-file that.

Whatever’s wrong with Shirvell, it definitely appears he’s not stable. He’s constructed a comfortable world for himself which serves to protect him from his deepest darkest secrets. He’s lost his job, and he may well be disbarred, so he’s sitting home with lots of time on his hands as that life crumbles.

He’s already shown a penchant for displacing blame by saying it was all caused by the liberal media. As things get worse for him, he’ll start blaming the object is his obsession, and it won’t be the obsession he blames, but the object. I’m afraid Armstrong is in some danger.

CPT_Doom

November 9th, 2010

B John – according to Armstrong’s attorney, who was on AC 360 last night, they decided against pursuing the personal protection order (PPO) because apparently they are pretty difficult to get under MI law if one is not in a domestic violence situation. Because Shirvell had been barred from the Michigan campus and had stopped his stalking, they decided to go for disbarment instead, and both Armstrong and his attorney have filed separate disbarment complaints.

On the other hand, I really hope Armstrong does not let his guard down now. I get a really creepy vibe off of Shirvell, far weirder than his clear self-hating of his sexuality. He reminds me just a bit too much of my cousin’s ex-husband, who tried to kill her on several occassions. No one knows what caused Shirvell to fixate on Armstrong, but I doubt losing his job is going to lessen the fixation.

B John

November 9th, 2010

Thanks for the clarification on the PPO CPT_Doom.

I get that same creepy feeling from Shirvell. It’s kind of that “if I can’t have you, no one can,” sort of feeling. The stalking and obsession has very much the feel of a highly volatile domestic relationship (unrequieted though it may be). I spent many years in the funeral business, seen it all, and this just has that feel to it like the situation with your cousin.

The guy has lost a pretty cushy job. He could very well be disbarred. He’s become a national joke. None of the usual suspects has risen to his defense. I’ve joked, along with others about his being hired by FRC or Focus on The Family, but the truth is he’s a pretty hot potato, so his prospects, law license or not, are probably bleak now. As the money dwindles, the pressure is only going to increase.

He’s going to be sitting around with nothing else to do but obsess about his situation. For someone already on the edge, that’s just not a healthy thing.

Timothy Kincaid

November 9th, 2010

Ya know, I’m pretty skeptical of armchair analysis, but in this case I hate to say that I think y’all are right. If I were Armstrong, I’d be careful. Sometimes someone is so off kilter that it is impossible to miss and Shirvell is one odd duck.

It makes me wonder how he got such a prestigious job. Even political cronyism doesn’t like to get too close to someone who is this bizarre.

I wonder if he comes across as more sane in person or if he’s just gotten obviously wacky fairly recently.

Emily K

November 9th, 2010

A lot of the “armchair analysts” out there have said he must have an intense crush on Armstrong, manifesting as intense jealousy and anger. Armstrong is the man he wants, and the man he wants to be (out, adjust, successful).

I’ve seen things like that happen before. I think this particular armchair analysis is correct or close to it. And yes I support taking on further protections.

Regan DuCasse

November 9th, 2010

How’s this for armchair analysis?

That boy ain’t right…

andrew

November 10th, 2010

Regan — I think you’ve hit on something there. If he weren’t such a twat, I’d feel bad for Shirvell… what could be going on for someone that they sacrifice everything they’ve worked for over such insipid weirdness?

andrew

November 10th, 2010

My apologies in advance to anyone who takes offense to my use of the t* word. I really just like how it rolls off the tongue. If I’m out of line, I stand correctable.

John

November 10th, 2010

Regan,

I think you just nailed it.

BlackDog

November 10th, 2010

@ Cpt. Doom: Yeah, now that you mention that I remember. I’d actually considered getting a PPO against my ex-wife due to HER stalking ME. But, since the situation was similar. (We were both going to college, and she got banned from the dorm after doing a bunch of REALLY CREEPY things one day.) after her getting a visit from Public Safety alone played hell with her life I left it at that. (She was staying with someone, not on the lease, and got kicked out.)

“It makes me wonder how he got such a prestigious job. Even political cronyism doesn’t like to get too close to someone who is this bizarre.”

@ Tim: I live in Michigan, the local paper had a blurb about this that I saw last night and Shirvell was Mike Cox’s campaign manager previously.

You know what really wierds me out? I remember reading somewhere (I don’t remember if it was here or somewhere else) that Shirvell was a graduate of Ave Maria law school (FundieCatholic, started by Tom Monoghan) I have to wonder how in the hell such a feminine dude as Shirvell made it through there without being questioned enough times to get aggravated and quit. Like I said, he seems very gay. I’d think that’d raise a lot of eyebrows in that sort of school.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.