Pope: gay hustlers can use condoms

Timothy Kincaid

November 20th, 2010

This is just bizarre: (bloomburg)

Pope Benedict XVI has opened the door on the previously taboo subject of condoms as a way to fight HIV, saying male prostitutes who use condoms may be beginning to act responsibly. It’s a stunning comment for a pontiff who has blamed condoms for making the AIDS crisis worse.

Benedict said that condoms are not a moral solution to stopping AIDS. But he said in some cases, such as for male prostitutes, their use could represent a first step in assuming moral responsibility “in the intention of reducing the risk of infection.”

It appears that Papa Ratzi’s logic is that by using condoms, male prostitutes are not really blocking procreation, unlike heterosexuals who use condoms. He appears to remain opposed to condom use for married heterosexuals in cases in which one party is infected with HIV.

I understand the thinking; I just can’t wrap my head around the morality. Yet, I accept it as perhaps a step in the right direction, a tiny inclination towards placing the good of the people above the Church’s somewhat arbitrary opposition to a piece of latex.

John in the Bay Area

November 20th, 2010

Of all groups to single out for an exception, he chose male prostitutes. Picking this particular group may say far more about Ratzinger than the Catholic Church’s attitude towards condom usage.

Candace

November 20th, 2010

This Pope’s thinking is s anachronistic and bizzare that anything short of sending us all to Gaywitz is a step in the right direction.

MarcusT

November 20th, 2010

Here’s an article with his comments in full: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11804798

As far as I can tell, he’s saying that if a male prostitute uses a condom, he (the prostitute) is taking the first step towards a “more human way of living sexuality” (quoted from the article).

Overall, it sounds from the excerpt like he thinks a condom in this case would be better than no condom, but that people are using condoms as some kind of substitute for reforming sexuality as a whole.

EZam

November 20th, 2010

What if the male prostitute is doing a woman?

Jonathan

November 21st, 2010

Well, the man’s a good academic. You’ve got to give him that. Well developed, internally consistent, massively thorough theory of ethics he’s got there.

And as long as he hides in crowds of people that love him and his very own city-state, he can keep pretending that theory is an accurate description of real life.

lurker

November 21st, 2010

I wonder how many gay male prostitutes there actually are who would NOT use a condom before because of the church’s prohibition on condoms . . . but who will now change their behavior ‘cuz of this statement.

Methinks not many.

I guess they’ll have one less thing to bring to confession, but it seems pretty minor in comparison with all of their myriad of other “offences”

Jafuf

November 21st, 2010

I guess he’s just saying it’s OK for members of his own personal ‘stable’ of male prostitutes to use them so he doesn’t run the risk of getting AIDs himself.

darkmoonman

November 21st, 2010

::sarcasm:: Wow, that is such a relief. I’d never do anything not sanctioned 100% by the wise & worldly Pope.

gar

November 21st, 2010

Welcomed, I suppose, but so bizarre on so many levels. . .

Steve in Colorado

November 21st, 2010

My initial reaction is to give credit when credit is due. Yes, it’s a baby step in the right direction. Despite that, I don’t see an substantive change in the Catholic Church’s teaching on homosexuality and sex (in general) in my lifetime. If I remember my Catholic catechism correctly, the church believes that the only purpose of sex is for procreation. Period. So be it that the world is overpopulated and that we are destroying this planet. So be it that humans are suffering from the effects of overpopulation. As long as it is physiological impossible for gay sex to result in a child the church will always view gay people as degenerates and lower life forms—even though gay people are not contributing to world overpopulation.

RobNYNY1957

November 21st, 2010

How long before the Primate of Rome lands a lucrative endorsement deal with Trojan?

Fg68at

November 21st, 2010

Oh. The “gay hustler”/”male prostitutes” is not only in German, it is also in English.

But from where it comes? I can not beliefe, that the Pope has spoken primaly about gay hustler. And all original citation i have read, there is nothing about this. There are only prostitutes.

Sadly i can only sort german news on date in Google News.

MarcusT

November 21st, 2010

So, this gets even more confusing.

http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2010/11/21/grammar-experts-needed-for-pope-comment-on-condoms/

Apparently it’s not even clear whether he was talking about male or female prostitutes.

Mark F.

November 21st, 2010

Well, considering that anal sex can’t ever result in children anyway, you aren’t making what is already said to be a bad sin any worse by using a condom. Seems logical.

Adam

November 22nd, 2010

@Mark F.

Except if the reports that the Pope specifically singled out male prostitutes are accurate, then it is not logical, because it seems to assume that female prositutes do not engage in anal sex with their clients.

Or possibly it assumes that female prostitutes don’t get HIV.

Whatever, I have trouble calling this position “logical” insofar as it is limited to male prostitutes.

Aeval

November 22nd, 2010

The inconsistency of religion:

Me: “If I did not know about God and sin, would I go to hell?”
Priest: “No, not if you did not know.” Me: “Then why did you tell me?”

God is not religious:

“If there is a God, atheism must seem to Him as less of an insult than religion.”

-Edmond de Goncourt

Nathan

November 22nd, 2010

Does nobody else get the impression that this is merely the RCC’s attempt to link the concepts of ‘gay’ and ‘condoms’ to further demonize both of them? This just seems like the same hypocritical posturing the RCC used when accused of harboring, protecting (and assisting!) child-rapist priests, by diverting attention to the RCC’s ‘gay priest’ issue.

It’s was a diversion, nothing more. And the RCC and its Nazi-youth Pope are just trying the same propaganda tactic, to link ‘gay’ with ‘AIDS’ and ‘condoms’.

BobN

November 22nd, 2010

However weird you think Catholic theology is and however incalcitrant this Pope is on matters of sexuality, this is an important step. No organization has done more to prevent condom distribution than the Catholic Church. Besides removing an obstacle to condom distribution worldwide for male prostitutes, this opens the door to allowing ANY condom distribution. If some of the rubbers intended for male prostitutes happen to find their way into the hands of female prostitutes, well, gosh, I’m sure the distributors didn’t mean for that to happen. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

Mark F.

November 22nd, 2010

@Adam

I don’t think the pope wants to actually say “anal sex.” So saying “male prostitute” makes people think “anal sex.”

Name: Mark

November 23rd, 2010

Fr John’s seeing this condom use as not aggravating an already gravely immoral situation – therefore merely a prevention of further disorder ; bearing no laudible credit whatsoever…a neutralising of aggravation is not direct moral agency – like kicking a cat into the road but waiting till the bus passes rather than kicking it under it.

Mark F.

November 23rd, 2010

The Vatican is now saying that using a condom is still not moral, but it’s less immoral than having unprotected sex and transmitting HIV.

Spartann

November 23rd, 2010

From the pages of ‘The Telegraph’, we learn today that a spokesman for Pope Benedict XVI has confirmed that the pontiff’s remarks were meant to cover women and transsexuals as well. A spokesman for His Holiness reported how he asked the pope if there was a serious distinction in the choice of male instead of female and he said “no”. The Pope further went on to say, “If it is a man, a woman or a transsexual who does it, we are always at the same point, which is the first step in responsibly avoiding passing on a grave risk to the other.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/vaticancityandholysee/8154176/Pope-women-as-well-as-men-can-use-condoms.html

Hey coming from the Pope it’s a start…and shouldn’t that be the message all of society acknowledges instead????

Richard Rush

November 24th, 2010

Instead of endorsing the limited use of condoms, why didn’t the Pope just invoke the power of prayer? Well, probably for the same reason that he travels around in public protected by bulletproof glass.

Nothing says “faith in God” quite like the Popemobile.

Spartann

November 24th, 2010

to Richard Rush…

A faith in God is not demonstrated by foolishly tossing one’s hands up…. but instead, knowing God will provide the impetus necessary to overcome any adversity………. In other words my friend, it means you’re given a choice….. Now it’s up to you to do the next right thing.

Priya Lynn

November 24th, 2010

Right Spartann, because no religious person with faith in your god has ever failed to overcome any adversity.

TJ

November 24th, 2010

WOW…So he really thinks that male hustlers are all gay. Stop thinking that all gay men go around giving it up the butt. I know a lot more str8 men and women that love to give band receive up the butt then gay men. You must first be educated on the sexual practices of humans before making a stupid statement like that. Wake up people I think your Antichrist is ahead of the churches and will say anything to start violence and chaos. Live and let live and leave the poor alter boys/girls alone.

Spartann

November 25th, 2010

to Priya Lynn…

True I feel at times my understanding of God makes my relationship with him extremely personal. However, it’s ridiculous for any one to suggest God only belongs to one person. Having said that,,,, you need to read my initial comment above. In it you’ll find where I point out how God presents the best method for problem solving, not the outcome…. The end result always depends on the way any individual applies the Lord’s principles.

Better luck next time Lynnie

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1956: The Adjustment of Male Overt Homosexuals

Federal Judge Blocks UNC From Enforcing North Carolina's "Bathroom Bill"

Georgia Pastor Who Praised Orlando Shooting Arrested for Child Molestation

Maine's Governor Is the Epitome Of What's Wrong In The Republican Party

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: Protesters March, then Riot in Greenwich Village over Police Harassment

Born On This Day, 1844: Edward Carpenter

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.